Editor’s Table: A Senseless Campaign
Improvement Era, vol. 7, no. 5, March 1904, pp. 382 to 384
EDITOR'S
TABLE.
A
SENSELESS
CAMPAIGN-
Just
now
there
seems
to
be
a
general,
united
uprising
of
the
religious
denominations
against
the
Latter-day
Saints.
The
excuse
for
the
turmoil
is
the
election
of
Hon.
Reed
Smoot
to
the
Senate
of
the
United
States,
—
not
by
the
Church
of
Jesus
Christ
of
Latter-
day
Saints,
but
by
the
Legislature
and
people
of
the
sovereign
state
of
Utah.
Every
woman's
organization
in
the
country
is
up
in
arms;
churches
and
religious
societies
are
all
vigorously
united
in
a
crusade
against
the
Church
of
Christ.
Petitions
have
come
from
all
parts
of
the
country
to
overwhelm
the
Senate,
asking
for
the
expulsion
of
Senator
Smoot
from
that
body.
The
whole
cam-
paign is
generaled
by
a
coterie
of
ministers.
Back
of
the
agi-
tators, hiding
behind
them,
stand
these
"shepherds
of
the
flocks,"
dabbling
in
dirty
politics
in
the
name
of
purity,
with
all
their
might
and
strength.
Is
the
campaign
justified?
The
charges
against
Mr.
Smoot
are
that
he
is
a
polygamist,
and
especially
that
he
is
an
active
officer
in
the
church
to
which
he
belongs,
and
to
which
it
is
alleged
he
acknowl-
edges allegiance
superior
to
that
which
he
owes
to
the
United
States
government.
The
first
charge
is
generally
conceded
to
be
false,
even
by
the
misled
petitioners
and
their
agitating
ministerial
generals.
The
only
charge,
then,
is
that
he
is
a
"Mormon,"
and,
being
so,
the
question
is,
whether
he
is
prohibited
from
holding
office
under
the
government;
whether
belief
in
his
religion
is
irreconcilable
with
American
citizenship;
whether
he
owes
his
church
an
allegiance
which
is
in
conflict
with
his
allegiance
to
the
government
of
our
country.
EDITORS
TABLE.
333
Happily
in
this
country
there
is
religious
freedom,
and
it
is
well
that
it
should
be
so,
otherwise
toleration
would
die;
hence,
that
Senator
Smoot
is
a
Latter-day
Saint
is
no
disqualification.
His
religious
belief
is
no
more
the
business
of
the
Senate
or
the
American
people,
or
the
ministers
and
their
adherents,
than
is
the
religious
belief
of
Senators
Dubois,
McComas,
Depew,
or
Hoar.
Personally,
he
is
a
good,
conscientious,
able,
temperate
man,
quite
the
peer
of
the
petitioners
and
their
generals
in
moral
purity
and
social
standing:
hence
this
does
not
stand
in
his
way.
His
religion
and
personality,
under
these
conditions,
cannot
act
as
a
bar.
He
is
a
law-abiding
citizen
of
the
United
States,
and
of
the
state
in
which
he
was
elected
—
truthful,
moral,
upright,
with
no
tarnish
on
his
name.
He
was
elected
in
the
proper
way
to
his
honored
position,
and
there
was
not
the
least
shadow
of
doubt
or
suspicion
cast
on
the
method
of
his
election.
There
was
no
money
or
other
undue
influence
used,
and
no
person
can
truthfully
accuse
him
or
the
legislature
which
elected
him,
of
any
fraud
or
irregu-
larity. His
was
among
the
cleanest
elections,
if
not
the
cleanest
elec-
tion, in
the
whole
country,
held
to
elect
men
to
the
exalted
office
of
Senator
of
the
United
States.
His
religion
teaches
loyalty
to
God,
to
government,
and
all
those
virtues
which
go
to
make
up
the
personality
of
the
senator,
a
belief
in
which
is
surely
not
irreconcilable
with
true
American
citizenship.
All
churches
claim
to
be
divinely
appointed,
and
place
God
above
country,
and
any
man
who
renders
true
homage
to
God,
cannot
break
the
law,
for
he
lives
above
it.
No
man
can
be
a
good
Latter-day
Saint
and
not
be
true
to
the
best
interests
and
general
welfare
of
his
country.
After
all
these
years,
it
is
folly
to
say
that
the
Church
is
antagonistic
to
the
national
government.
The
part
which
our
people
took
in
the
Mexican
and
Spanish-
American
wars
should
be
enough
to
eternally
brand
such
statement
false.
The
allegiance
claimed
from
its
members
by
the
Church
does
not
prevent
a
member
from
being
a
loyal
citizen
of
the
na-
tion. It
rather
aids
him;
fidelity
to
the
Church
enables
a
man
better
to
entertain
patriotic
allegiance
to
his
nation
and
country.
There
is
nothing
required
of
a
Latter-day
Saint
that
can
in
any
way
be
construed
to
militate
against
loyalty
to
the
nation,
and
for
that
reason
Senator
Smoot
is
under
no
obligations
to
the
Church
384
IMPROVEMENT
ERA.
that
can
come
in
conflict
with
his
fealty
to
country.
It
is
plain
that
the
campaign
of
the
ministers
is
unjustified.
Why,
then,
do
they
carry
it
on?
It
is
to
fight
the
Church
to
which
Senator
Smoot
belongs,
over
his
head.
The
fact
that
he
holds
the
priesthood
is
gall
and
wormwood
to
them.
They
fight
him
to
get
an
opportunity
to
oppose
the
.work
of
the
Lord.
And
they
antagonize
the
Saints
because
they
believe
in
revelation,
and
choose
to
worship
God
in
the
way
that
Christ
commanded
when
he
estab-
lished the
Church
upon
the
earth;
and
for
the
further
reason
that
the
Saints
refuse
to
acknowledge
these
priests
as
spiritual
leaders.
For
these
reasons
they
combine
together
and
seek
to
place
the
Latter-day
Saints
under
a
political
ban.
They
are
unjustified.
The
Church
is
not
in
politics.
It
did
not
elect
Senator
Smoot.
Its
mission
is
to
preach
the
gospel
of
Christ;
to
help
the
needy;
to
do
good
to
all
men
—
not
to
control
politics.
The
Latter-
day
Saints
entertain
individual
views
as
to
politics,
to
which
they
have
a
right;
and
are
entitled
to
them
as
much
as
the
peti-
tioners are
to
theirs.
The
Saints
do
not
vote
as
one
party,
and
do
not
even
combine
politically
to
fight
their
enemies,
—
a
course
which
the
ministers
and
their
congregations
have
not
only
recently
pur-
sued in
Utah,
but
which
they
are
now
pursuing
in
seeking
to
stir
up
political
frenzy
in
Congress
and
the
nation,
by
accusing
the
Saints
of
disloyalty,
treachery,
and
all
manner
of
unworthiness,
when
the
facts
are
that
their
history
proves
them
to
have
been
loyal,
honest
and
worthy,
in
every
test
to
which
they
have
been
subjected.
Furthermore,
it
is
a
ridiculous
farce
to
ask
Congress
to
in-
vestigate and
report
upon
the
moral
condition
of
a
church,
in
order
to
determine
whether
a
United
States
Senator,
against
whom
no
wrong
can
be
found,
and
who
was
regularly
elected,
is
entitled
to
his
seat
in
the
Senate.
If
the
laws
are
broken
by
individuals
of
the
Church,
such
individuals
are
amenable
to
the
laws;
but
what
bearing
their
shortcomings
may
have
upon
the
seating
of
a
senator
from
the
state
in
which
they
live,
only
the
enemies
of
the
Church
appear
to
comprehend.
Justice
and
common
sense
can
see
no
related
connection.
It
is
a
dangerous
precedent
which
the
agitators
are
seeking
to
establish.
If
the
Latter-day
Saints
are
proscribed
today,
what