Joseph Smith as Scientist. III: Natural Law

IMPROVEMENT ERA. Vol. VIL JANUARY, 1904. No. 3. JOSEPH SMITH AS SCIENTIST. BY DR.
JOHN
A.
WIDTSOE,
DIRECTOR
OF THE AGRICULTURAL. EXPERIMENT
STATION,
LOGAN,
UTAH. III.— NATURAL
LAW. In the seventh book of the Republic of Plato* occurs the fol- lowing passage: "Imagine a number of men living in an underground cavernous chamber, with an entrance open to the light, extending along the- entire length of the cavern, in which they have been confined, from childhood, with their legs and necks so shackled, that they are- obliged to sit still and look straight forward, because their chains- render it impossible for them to turn their heads round; and im- agine a bright fire burning some way off, above and behind them,, and an elevated roadway passing between the fire and the prison- ers, with a low wall built along it, like the screens which conjurers put up in front of their audiences, and above which they exhibit their wonders. Also figure to yourself a number of persons walk- ing behind the wall, and carrying with them statues of men and' images of other animals, wrought in wood and stone and all kinds; of materials, together with various other articles, which overtop * Golden , Treasury edition, pp. 235, 236.

162 IMPROVEMENT ERA. the wall; and, as you might expect, let some of the passers-by be talking, and the others silent. "Let me ask whether persons so confined could have seen any- thing of themselves or of each other, beyond the shadows thrown by the fire upon the part of the cavern facing them? And is not their knowledge of the things carried past them equally limited? And if they were able to converse with one another, would they not be in the habit of giving names to the objects which they saw before them? If their prison house returned an echo from the part facing them, whenever one of the passers-by opened his lips, to what could they refer the voice, if not to the shadow which was passing? Surely such persons would hold the shadows of those manufactured articles to be the only realities." With reference to our absolute knowledge of the phenomena of nature, this splendid comparison is as correct today as it was in the days of Plato, about 400 B. C; we are only as prisoners in a great cave, watching shadows of passing objects thrown upon the cavern wall, and reflecting upon the real natures of the things whose shadows we see. We know things only by their effects; the essential nature of matter and energy is far from our understand- ing. In early and mediaeval times, the recognition of the fact that nature in its ultimate form is unknowable, led to many harmful superstitions. Chief among the fallacies of the early ages was the belief that God at will could, and did, cause various phenomena to appear in nature, which might be contrary to all human experience. As observed in the last article, a class of men arose who claimed to be in possession of knowledge which made them also able, at will, to cause various supernatural manifestations. Thus arose the occult sciences, so called, — alchemy, astrology, magic, witchcraft, and all other similar abominations of the intellect. Such beliefs made the logical study of nature superfluous, for any apparent regularity or law in nature might at any time be overturned by a person in possession of a formula of the black art or a properly treated broomstick. While such ideas prevailed among the majority of men, the rational study of science could make little progress. In the march of the ages, as the ideas of men were classified, it began to be un-

JOSEPH SMITH AS SCIENTIST. 163 derstood that the claims of the devotees of the mystical arts not only could not be substantiated but were in direct opposition to the linown operations of nature. It became clear to the truthseekers, that in nature a given cause, acting upon any given object, provid- ing all surrounding conditions be left unchanged, will always pro- duce the same effect. Thus, coal of a certain quality, brought to a high temperature in the presence of air, will burn and produce heat; a stick held in water at the right angle will appear crooked; iron kept in contact with moisture and air, at the right tempera- ture, will be changed into rust; sunlight passed through a glass prism will be broken into rainbow colors; ordinary plants placed in a dark cellar will languish and die. No matter how often trials are made, the above results are obtained; and today it is safe to assert that in the material world no relation of cause and effect, once established, has failed to reappear at the will of the investi- gator. As this principle of the constancy in the relation between cause and effect was established, the element of chance in natural phenomena, with its attendant arts of magic, had to disappear. It is now well understood by intelligent persons that the law of order controls all the elements of nature. It is true that the cause of any given effect may, itself, be the effect of other causes, and that the first cause of daily phenomena is not and probably cannot be understood. It is also true that very seldom is the mind able to comprehend why certain causes, save the simpler ones, should produce certain effects. In that respect we are again nothing more than Plato's cave prisoners, seeing the shadows of ultimate realities. However, the recognition of the principle of the invariable relation between cause and effect was a great onward stride in the intellectual development of the world. Now, as men began to investigate nature with her forces, ac- cording to the new light, numerous relations of the forces were discovered — in number far beyond the comprehension of the human mind. Then it was found necessary to group all facts of a similar nature, and invent, if possible, some means by which the proper- ties of the whole group might be stated in language so simple as to reach the understanding. Thus came the laws of nature. For instance, men from earliest times observed the heavenly bodies and the regularity of their motions.
Theories of the uni-

164 IMPROVEMENT ERA. verse were invented which should harmonize with the known facts. As new facts were discovered, the theories had to be changed and extended. First it was believed that the earth was fixed in mid- space, and sun and stars were daily carried around it. Hipparchus improved this theory by placing the earth not exactly in the cen- ter of the sun's circle. Ptolemy, three hundred years later, con- sidered that the sun and moon move in circles, yearly, around the earth, and the other planets in circles, whose centers again des- cribed circles round the earth. Copernicus simplified the whole system by considering that the earth rotated around its axis, and around the sun. Keppler next showed that the earth moved around the sun in certain curves termed ellipses. Finally, Newton hit upon the wide-embracing law of gravitation, which unifies all the known facts of astronomy.* All the earlier laws were correct, so far as they included all the knowledge of the age in which they were proposed, but were insufficient to include the new discoveries. Laws of nature are, therefore, man's simplest and most com- prehensive expression of his knowledge of certain groups of natural phenomena. They are man-made, and subject to change as knowl- edge grows; but, as they change, they approach or should approach more and more nearly to the perfect law. Modern science is built upon the assumption that the relations between cause and effect are invariable, and that these relations may be grouped to form great natural laws, which express the modes by which the forces of the universe manifest themselves. In this matter, science is frankly humble, and acknowledges that the region of the unknown is far greater than that of the known. Forces, relations and laws may exist as yet unknown to the world of science, which, used by a human or superhuman being, might to all appearances change well-established relations of known forces. That would be a miracle; but a miracle simply means a phenomenon not understood, in its cause and effect relations. It must also be admitted that men possess no absolute certainty that though certain forces, brought into a certain conjunction a thou- sand times, have produced the same effect, they will continue to do so.
Should a variation occur, however, that also must be ascribed See Grammar of Science, Pearson, pp. 117 and 118.

JOSEPH SMITH AS SCIENTIST. 165 to an inherent property of the forces or conditions, or the existence of a law not understood.* There can be no chance in the opera- tions of nature.
This is a universe of law and order. Were it not for the sake of the completeness of the argument running through these papers, it would be unnecessary to call at- tention to the fact that Joseph Smith in a very high degree held views similar to those taught by science relative to cause and effect and the reign of law. From the beginning of his career, the Prophet insisted upon order, or system, as the first law in the religion or system of phil- osophy which he founded.f Moreover, the order which he taught was 'of an«unchangeable nature, corresponding to the invariable re- lation between cause and effect. He wrote, "There is a law, irre- vocably decreed in heaven before the foundations of this world, up- on'iwhich "all blessings are predicated; and when we obtain any blessing from God, it is by obedience to that law upon which it is predicated.''^ No text book in science has a clearer or more pos- itive statement than this, of the fact that like causes have like ef- fects, like actions like results. The eternal nature of natural law is further emphasized as follows: 'If there be bounds set to the heavens, or to the seas: or to the dry land, or to the sun, moon or stars; all the times of their revolutions; all the appointed days, months, and years, and all the days of their days, months, and years, and all their glories, laws, and set times, shall be revealed, in the days of the dispensation of the fullness of times, according to that which was ordained in the midst of the Council of the Eternal God of all other Gods, before this world was."§ Those who m.ay be inclined to believe that this doctrine was taught in a spiritual sense only, should recall that Joseph Smith taught also that spirit is only a pure form of matter,] | so that the * The Credentials of Science, the Warrant of Faith, Cooke, pp. 169 , 170. t Doctrine and Covenants, 28:13; 132:8. ± Doctrine and Covenants, 130:20,21. § Doctrine and Covenants, 121:30-32. 11 Doctrine and Covenants, 131:7.

166 IMPROVEMENJ ERA. principles of the material world must have their counterparts to the spiritual world. Besides, in the last quotation reference is made to such material bodies as sun, moon, and stars. In other places, special mention is made of the fact that the material uni- verse is controlled by law.
For instance : "All kingdoms have a law given: and there are many king- doms; * * * * and unto every kingdom is given a law; and unto every law there are certain bounds also and conditions. **:!= ^j^(j again, verily I say unto you, he hath given a law unto all things by which they move in their times and their seasons; and their courses are fixed; even the courses of the heavens and the earth, which comprehend the earth and all the planets." This also is a clear, concise statement of law and its nature, which is not excelled by the definitions cf science. There can be no doubt from these quotations, as from many others that might be made, that Joseph vSmith based his teachings upon the recogni- tion that law pervades the universe, and that none can transcend law. Certainly the claim cannot be made that Joseph Smith antic- ipated the world of science in the recognition of this important principle; but it is a source of marvel that he should so clearly recognize and state it, at a time when many religious sects and philosophical creeds chose to assume that natural laws could be set aside easily by mystical methods that might be acquired by anyone. In some respects, the scientific test of the divine inspira- tion of Joseph Smith lies here. Ignorant and superstitious as his enemies say he was, the mystical would have attracted him greatly, and he would have played for his own interest upon the supersti- tious fears of his followers. Instead, he taught doctrines abso- lutely free from mysticism, and built a system of religion in which the invariable relation of cause and effect is the cornerstone. In- stead of priding himself, to his disciples, upon his superiority to the laws of nature, he taught distinctly that "the law also maketh you free."t Herein he recognized another great principle — that freedom consists in the adaptation to law, not in the opposition t« it. * Doctrine avd Covenants, 88:36-38, 42, 43. t Doctrine and Covenants, 98:8.

JOSEPH SMITH AS SCIENTIST. 167

However, whatever else the Prophet Joseph Smith was, he most certainly was in full harmony with the scientific principle that the universe is controlled by law.

(To be continued.)