Skip to content
MRM Library
Previous sectionVisit to the Countess of WarwickNext sectionSome Astronomical Suggestions

Dispensation of Abraham

Improvement Era, vol. 4, no. 9, July 1901, pp. 656 to 657

Madsen, C. A.

DISPENSATION OF ABRAHAM.

BY BISHOP C. A. MADSEN.

What do our profane historians know about the dispensation of Abraham? Can any inference be drawn from between the lines of profane history, indicating the existence of a gospel dispensation in the days of the great patriarch Abraham? Of course, to rightly judge the inferences, just qualifications must be brought into requisition, dealing with both sacred and pro- fane conceptions. Who, for instance, was the architect of the great pyramid at Gizeh, "an altar to God in the midst of Egypt," containing unparal- leled hints on untrodden grounds in astronomic science? And who built the Egyptian Thebes? Who were the masters of the unequaled architecture in the old cities, on the east bank of the Red Sea? Where did the classic culture originate? How did it come to pass that all this grandure and advanced civilization accumulated and concentrated around the inheritance of Abraham? Do things produce only in their own likeness? Or can the greater grow out of the lesser? Can profane history produce the chronology of the esthetic, ethic, and religious spheres; oris it limited within the first two and necessarily silent on the third?

DISPENSATION OF ABRAHAM. 657

The profane sphere may define itself as being "without tem. pie"; but can it explain truly how it came to be in that condition? or can a profane sphere define and understand itself, through what it has lost? Would it be a vain effort to endeavor to explain to a profane world how it degenerated into its present sphere? Or, would it be acceptable vicarious work to lead it out of such orbit, and, if possible, return it into a sacred sphere? The classic, esthetic cultus was partly appreciated, preserved, imitated, admired, and almost worshiped, by a profane world. So also was its ethic sister, the Roman law, not alone tolerated, but fully accepted: its philosophy of morals was taken entirely from the Mosaic ten commandments, and made the foundation for all law-giving up to this day. But, could the undoubted forerunner — the religious sphere, existing through celestial communion, and always dependent upon the revelations of Jesus Christ, unknown to the two former, ever be handled understandingly, by a profane world or its historians? Vain efforts might be made to understand it, unlimited argu- ment be indulged in, but without reaching a true culmination; because being cut off from revelation, or having had itself cut off therefrom, a profane world does not and can not know its own sphere from the standpoint of sacred conditions. Hence, we find that profane history is of necessity, and un- conciously, silent on the divine dispensation of the great patri- arch. True interpretations of the more or less unknown sacred signs, often found scattered, like strangers, between the lines of profane history, ostracized from the house of their kindred, are nevertheless, frequently reached by searchlights of truth unknown to the world.