---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 32
number: 4
published: 1929-02
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: "*Improvement Era* 32, no. 4 (February 1929). Salt Lake City: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations, February 1929."
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera3204unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera3204unse
curator_note: Internet Archive issue scan; advertising and unpaginated plates omitted.
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1929-02)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera3204unse
  publication_year: 1929
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1929, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Improvement Era, February 1929

<!-- page:269 -->

Improvement Era Vol. XXXII FEBRUARY. 1929 No. 4 Religion and Science A COMPARISON AND A CONTRAST By Prof. James L. Barker, of the University of Utah NEW discoveries in science are usually accepted, though not al- ways, within a short time after they are made. One hundred years after the Prophet Joseph began giving new religious truths to the world, his teachings are accepted by only a very small part of the earth's population: and, a hundred years after His death, the mission of the Savior had met with no more general favor. Why this difference in the readiness with which the world accepts scientific and religious truth? Is it that scientific truth can be tested and, on the contrary, religious truth can not? It is generally agreed that it is possible to test much, if not all. of scientific theory. Is it likewise possible to test the beliefs of re- ligion? If religious belief can be tested, wherein do methods .of evaluating and testing truth in science and religion agree and wherein do they differ? If science and religion are in harmony, will they continue to be in accord tomorrow and next year? Religion is held by some in less high regard than formerly because they think that its beliefs are in conflict with science. Others point out an essential agreement in the facts of religion and science. Be that as it may. it would seem that it is not sufficient to indicate an agreement at any given moment in order to reconcile religion and science, but rather a demonstration is needed that eventually there can be no conflict and consequently any disagreement that may pos- sibly exist today or tomorrow can not be vital. Temporary disagreement alone does not seem to be fatal either in religion or science. In religion there have been conflicting beliefs: during the life time of Jesus, the Gospel was thought to be for the children of Israel only: after the vision given to Peter, it was preached to the Gentiles: before the time of the Savior, signs were sometimes given to demonstrate the divine calling of the servants of God. Aaron's rod was changed to a serpent, the false prophets were con- sumed by fire: on the contrary. Jesus condemned those who should seek after a sign.

