---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - W. S. Wanlass
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 24
number: 5
published: 1921-03
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'W. S. Wanlass, "The Work of the Business Organizer," *Improvement Era* 24, no. 5 (March 1921): 423–429.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2405unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera2405unse
start_page: 423
end_page: 429
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1921-03)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2405unse
  publication_year: 1921
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1921, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# The Work of the Business Organizer

<!-- page:423 -->

The Work of the Business Organizer
By W. S. Wanlass, Ph. D., Department of Business Administration, Agricul-
          tural College of Utah, formerly Professor of Economics,
                    Union College, Schenectady, N. Y.

     A basal characteristic of the present organization of industry,   hardly less fundamental than private property and
competition, is what is known by economists as the division of
Tabor.   "The history of industry can be viewed as simply the
ever widening application of the principle of the division of
labor." Hardly any civilization seems possible without some
industrial specialization, but our own age is peculiar because
of the extent to which it has been carried. By division of labor
we generally mean the system under which the work to be
done is sub-divided so that each worker devotes his time to one
"step" or task in the larger process. In the cobbler's shop, one
man makes a pair of shoes; in the modern shoe factory, the
work of hundreds of men is involved in making a pair of shoes.
     Division of labor is really of three kinds. Historically and
logically, the first form is specialization in the trades or crafts.
This was one of the earlier characteristics of the development
of industry following the breaking up o£ the feudal system and
the establishment of towns and cities. Examples of this form
of division or specialization are still seen in such trades or professions as the carpenter, mason and physician.       But here, as
throughout industry, the next development, the sub-division of
the trade or craft into separate steps or processes, may be seen.
The third form of division of labor is the geographical or territorial division.   With the development of industry and commerce and a more stable political life in the world, there has
been not only a territorial division tending toward maximum
production within countries, but whole nations have devoted
themselves largely to the production of those things which their
economic situation best fitted them to produce, and have depended on the rest of the world for things which they needed
but did not produce. Generally, all of these forms of division
of labor, are found in combination. Needless to say, the third
     —
form, the devotion of nations to the production of those things
                                                   —
which they are peculiarly fitted to produce could and would
be much further developed with immeasurable benefits to humanity, if the spectre of war and deprivation were not forever

<!-- page:424 -->

424                     IMPROVEMENT ERA
present. These possible economic benefits constitute a weighty
argument for any feasible scheme which will make international
peace more secure.
     From what has been said of the division of labor and interdependence, it is evident that somewhere in the economic
system there must be some guiding or co-ordinating force, if
this multitude of small tasks and specialized workers is to be
brought together in such ways, at such places, and in such proportions as to produce the things which society desires.     In
Marshall's words, "the efficiency of specialized machinery or
specialized skill is but one condition of its economic use; the
other is that sufficient work must be found to keep it well
employed." This function of co-ordinating the labor of others,
itself a form of specialization, is the work of the industrial or
business organizer, or, to use the French term, the entrepreneur.
Of course, there were business organizers of a kind long before we had the present minute division of labor. In fact it was
the creation of business units larger than those found in the
home which encouraged and made possible a greater degree of
specialization.    But, be that as it may, we all recognize that
there are today millions of workers each incapable of producing
more than a very small part of the things necessary to satisfy his
own wants, and most of them incapable of producing any complete thing without the assistance of others. It is to the task
of bringing together these workers, whose specialized abilities
and skill make them complementary to each other, that the
organizer must devote a large part of his energies.
      But this is only a part of the function of the organizer. He
it is who must perceive, often far in advance of the actual need

or demand, what society is going to want and will be willing
to pay for.     With the present "round about" system of production, the beginning of the manufacture of an article must
generally take place months, not infrequently years, before the
finished product is offered in the market. Not only this, but
he must know, as nearly as can be known, how much goods
or service will be wanted, and how much people can be made to
pay for it. If he fails in this, his reward may prove to be a negative rather than a positive sum.       He is, of course, not left to
mere chance in determining these things. He is greatly assisted by an intimate knowledge of markets, actual and potential; statistical information of what has been done in the
past; and, perhaps greatest of all, by stimulating, through advertising and other means, a demand where one had not existed before. Indeed, it is by the enterprise and imagination of
a few, rather than by the conscious demand of the many, that
new conveniences and comforts are yearly added to our life,

<!-- page:425 -->

WORK OF THE BUSINESS ORGANIZER                    425

and that economic progress goes steadily forward. That which
contributes most to the success of an industrial institution is
not the indispensable hand labor of the men, but the brain labor
which organizes and directs. It is by thought and calculation
and foresight that large economics are effected, processes improved, new machinery installed, and new wants perceived; in
these and in many other ways the skilful organizer can do more
to insure the success of the enterprise than the industry and
skill of a thousand factory workers.
      The organizer, then, whether manufacturer or merchant,
is  the pivot of the modern industrial organization.       On the
efficiency with which he organizes the co-operation of specialists the effectiveness of their work depends.    On him the consumer depends for getting what he wants and not some makeshift.  Specialization is the principle on which all increase in
                          —
productive power depends specialization is effective only when
the specialists co-operate, and with every -increase in the degree
of specialization the work of organizing the co-operation becomes more important and more difficult.
     It is of the utmost importance, therefore, to the material
well-being of society that the right men occupy this position.
If they do not, there will be waste; inefficiency there neutralizes the efficiency of scores of hundreds and even thousands
of specialized workers, just as an incompetent general can
ruin the finest army. Inefficiency in the organizer means that
departments are held up because other departments are not
ready for their product; it means that some firms in the trade
work overtime, while others are not fully employed; it means
that articles are produced that the consumer does not want and
will not pay for, while articles he does want are produced in
insufficient quantities and, consequently, are to be had only at
a fancy price. The organizers control the capital of the country, they decide,—  guiding themselves, of course, by reference
                              —
to the demand of consumers,      to what purpose it shall be applied and in what form it shall be applied. Want of judgment
on their part may result in the creation of forms of capital
                  —
which are useless as, for instance, when mills are put up to
meet an increase in demand which never comes. Originality
and enterprise on their part, on the other hand, will make production cheaper and cheaper, since it will insure the application of capital, in those forms and at those points, where it is
most productive. They are society's paymasters: to them the
consumer hands the price of the goods which he consumes;
they distribute it between the different classes of workers, capitalists, and land-owners; in a word, they employ land, labor
and capital. Competition between land, labor, and capital for

<!-- page:426 -->

426                    IMPROVEMENT ERA

the national income takes place through the employer, and
since the merchant employs the different employers in the
same way as they employ land, labor and capital, the competition between different trades for the national income takes
place through the merchant.     They "represent," as it were, the
consumer in his relations with producers. Their function, in
fact, whether they perform it ill or well, is the organization of
production.
     When it is realized how much our economic welfare is dependent upon the training and skill of the organizer of business, the importance of providing the best facilities for preparing men and women for this work is at once apparent. Just
as the success of an army depends upon the training and skill
of its officers, so the success of business enterprise depends upon
the ability of our industrial and business leaders.
     Thus far, in what we have said of the organizer, we have
implied that he is acting merely as an individual and almost
wholly upon his own responsibility. This is true in most cases,
but there is a strong trend in other directions. So large have
business enterprises become in some fields that men find it
necessary to associate themselves together in order to undertake
them. In such cases there may be a distribution of the work
of organizing and managing, or what is more commonly the
case, there will be merely a distribution of the responsibility
or business risk, leaving the work of organizing and managing
largely concentrated in one person who is guided by a general
business policy and assisted by subordinates.     In other cases,
the organization and management of industry may be turned
over to specialists who assume little or no business risk, but
are chosen for the work merely because of their special training, skill and experience.
     It may be apparent from what has just been said, but special
note should be taken that the organizer and capitalist need not
be, and often are not, one and the same person. Capitalists are
the owners of goods (factories, machinery, tools, and materials)
used in production, whether they direct the use of those goods
or not. To be a capitalist, a man need not even own any specific capital goods, but may merely have an interest in them
represented by a stock-certificate. Any person, not already a
capitalist, becomes one when he refrains from spending all his
income for consumption goods, and uses the part thus saved to
buy, or assist in buying, goods to be used in producing other
goods. There are many more capitalists than organizers, and
many more than is commonly supposed.
     There is one other distinction we should make before we
leave this phase of the subject.   Somewhat akin to the work

<!-- page:427 -->

WORK OF THE BUSINESS ORGANIZER                 427

of the organizer, and to some extent growing out of it, but
representing a still greater degree of specialization, is the work
of the promoter. It is the special function of the promoter to
perceive business opportunities, either in new fields or through
the combining of industrial units already in existence. He must
not only perceive the opportunity, but he must by careful study,
by negotiations with interested parties, and sometimes by more
artful means, draw up a plan or present a scheme that will convince others (unless he intends to exploit the opportunity himself) that the proposed undertaking is a feasible one. When he
has succeeded in convincing others so that they are willing to
finance the scheme and undertake to carry it out, the work of
the promoter, as such, is ended.
     Due to the fact that thousands of people have been induced,
by the convincing arguments of promoters, to assist in financing
many "opportunities" for which little or no reward was received, "promotion" has fallen into more or less popular disrepute.   There has undoubtedly been much ground for this
feeling.  The "blue-sky" laws of this and other states are pro-
                              group of unprincipled promoters
tests against the practices of a
and their even more unscrupulous representatives and salesmen.
Promotion, like most activities, may be legitimately used as
well as grossly abused. Here, as elsewhere, we must learn to
condemn with discrimination. When we are inclined to condemn promoters as a class, we should remember that many of
our most notable modern conveniences, including the telephone
and the electric light, were once in the promotion stage with
many more doubters than enthusiasts.
    There is no more inspiring chapter in all the annals of
American history than that which traces our industrial expansion. So well and so frequently has it been described that
we shall not take time and space to do it here. The great
movement from East to West has been called, and rightly so,
the greatest migration of people in all history. From the standpoint of numbers involved and territory covered, the migrations of antiquity, about which we have read so much, fade into
insignificance.  Almost within the memory of men still living
a veritable empire has been brought under the domain of civilized   man.
    Nor has this industrial expansion been merely territorial
and gigantic in scope. The abundance and variety of natural
resources, the industry and thrift of our people, and the energy
and imagination of our industrial leaders have combined to produce an economic life which, in richness and diversity, is likewise unparalleled in all history.   We   have spoken of imagination. The importance of this factor in past and present
                                                           develop-

<!-- page:428 -->

428                     IMPROVEMENT ERA

ment has been frequently overlooked.        Here, as nowhere else,
this   human faculty has found a field for exercise almost without hindrance or limit. There is an immediate relationship
between the vision and foresight of our industrial leaders and
the very magnitude of our economic expansion.
      However, when we boast of the past triumphs of our industrial progress, and plume ourselves on the strides we are
making, we should remember that all the praise is not due to
the few great ones who have made the discoveries and inventions, or have been gifted with constructive imagination. The
thousands of hardy men and women who early came to these
barren wastes, braved the frontier, procured a living, and with
little or no capital bequeathed something to the future, are
deserving of our gratitude. They and the millions of workers
who have built our homes, tilled our fields, and constructed
our railways and highways have in large part made possible the
vast accumulated wealth of the present.     If there were no accumulation of wealth or capital, civilization would soon lose
all that civilization means.  Indeed, there can be no economic
progress unless there is a surplus produced over that consumed
by the persons who are immediately engaged in production.
      With the constant increase in capital, that part of wealth
which assists production, the margin between production and
consumption, has gradually become larger and larger. Moreover, despite our ever expanding economic life, additions to
existing capital can be made with greater and greater ease.
Increased capital generally leads to better organization and in
most industries brings a return which is more than proportionate to the  amount of the increase.  Not only has better organization increased production, but the more efficient, more
effective forms which capital is constantly taking, add greatly
to its productivity. Even in some of those industries which exploit natural resources where the trend is nearly always towards
lessened returns, this tendency has been largely offset by the
more effective use of capital.     But, notwithstanding all these
facts, capital is today, as it has nearlyalways been in the past,
the limiting factor in our economic development and progress.
With all our vast hoard of capital, which we now value in billions, there is today a demand for capital as insistent as it has
ever been before.
     We see in every line of industry the eagerness to produce.
The demand for things is in sight; there is need on every hand
to increase and improve the productive equipment and enlarge
the output.    But the capital is lacking. We are not saving
enough from current production. Not enough of our working
force is employed in making provisions for increased produc-

<!-- page:429 -->

!    —                     ——

                WORK OF THE BUSINESS ORGANIZER                        429

tion in the future.  Without adequate capital, or with capital
obtainable only at exhorbitant rates of interest, the business organizer or manager, no matter how capable or efficient, is distinctly handicapped and seriously limited in organizing and
directing the processes of industry.
Logan, Utah

                     Some Day! Somewhere!
         Some day, 'twill be made straight, sweetheart, till then
                 We must be strong;
         Clouds without sunshine, God gives not to men;
                   However long
         And desolate the bleak December be,
              In his good time, he giveth sunny skies
                 And joys, that we
              May know how ever fatherly and wise
         The Father is to struggling      souls and weak,
                Some day!

         Somehow, 'twill be made straight, sweetheart, I know
                   'Tis hard to say
         "Thy will," and wait with patient heart and weak
                   Until the day
         That God his fulfilled promises may show.
             We cannot tell the manner, but be sure
                   However slow
         And wearily the moments pass, the hour
                Of our redemption comes.    Strive to endure

         The motto of thy life and mine, until
                We learn his will,
                    Somehow!

         Somewhere, 'twill be made straight, sweetheart, the place
                We know not now,
          But   in a freer   sphere through God's dear grace,
                    We— I and thou—
                Shall findbeyond the blue unsullied skies
                The answer to the When, the How and Where;
                  Shall learn how wise
              And gracious is the God who answers prayer;
          Apart on earth, Some day, Somehow, O sweet,
                We two shall meet
                    Somewhere
                                                        —Author unknown
