---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - George Stewart
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 24
number: 4
published: 1921-02
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'George Stewart, "The Old and the New in Agriculture," *Improvement Era* 24, no. 4 (February 1921): 341–343.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2404unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera2404unse
start_page: 341
end_page: 343
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1921-02)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2404unse
  publication_year: 1921
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1921, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# The Old and the New in Agriculture

<!-- page:341 -->

Breeding better strains of potatoes   — Utah Agricultural Experiment Station
   The Old and the New in Agriculture
By George Stewart, M. S., In Charge of Field Crop Investigations, Utah
                     Agricultural Experiment Station

     The earliest methods of soil culture and plant production
can not, of course, manifest themselves after thousands of years.
Somewhere a knowledge of agriculture creeps slowly out of the
mist of the forgotten and gradually becomes distinct. Farm
relics found in Switzerland and northern Europe tell clearly
that the Lake Dwellers, long before the time of Moses, grew
wheat; but not even the barest record carries any information
of their tillage methods, except that they were very crude. History does, however, speak clearly of the Nile's flooding its banks,
irrigating wheat, barley, sorghum, vetch, melons, and fruits; of
truck crops grown upon hanging gardens in Babylon; of a gigantic reservoir which furnished water for land and people in
ancient Sabaea; of the dry-farming of Palestine, and of the fertilizing of the farms by the Hebrews under compulsion of law;
of the great Roman aqueducts that carried water high in the air
over lowlands to city and farm; and of Columella, Virgil, and
Cato's having taught the descendants of Romulus agriculture
that is considered good science today. Less directly, but none
the less clearly, history carries the record of good and poor
harvests in the western world. Prescott mentions a fair-skinned
teacher of tillage among the Mexicans whom they expected to
return; Longfellow rehearses Hiawatha's teaching the natives
how to grow better Indian corn.
                           A Bit of History
    In colonial days maize was the principal crop. Squanto
showed Miles Standish and his people how to make it grow on

<!-- page:342 -->

342                    IMPROVEMENT ERA

the impoverished soil of New England by fertilizing each hill
with fish. Powhatan gave Captain John Smith corn when that
redoubtable leader seized the chief by the hair, and, pistol in
hand, demanded food for the starving settlers of Jamestown,
while hundreds of warriors looked on. Spaniards found corn
the most important crop of Mexico and Peru. Potatoes no larger
than eggs supplemented the diet of meat and maize. In Kentucky Daniel Boone ground into meal corn raised between the
stumps. The native grasses made forage; the woods furnished
fruits and nuts as well as flegh. None of these people attempted
real plowing; tools of wood scratched the soil.    When this no
longer sufficed to keep fertile the constantly-cropped lands, old
farms became once more a part of the wilderness. The Virginians, both before and after Independence, planted tobacco
year after year in the same fields. Following the invention of
the cotton gin, the Southerners did likewise with cotton. No
one foresaw the vast stretches of abandoned farms that were to
follow; hence no one thought of crop rotation, fallow, deepplowing, or clean cultivation. Little better are the farmers who
now keep a field of alfalfa or of sugar-beets for twenty years.
In agriculture a man must not put all his eggs in one basket.

                    What Happened in Utah
     Just as the cotton boll- weevil compelled rotation, deep
plowing, clean cultivation, and timely planting in the cotton
areas, so the alfalfa weevil, June-grass, and seasons of small precipitation compel them in Utah. Let us examine wheat-growing
in a certain valley. A number of years ago several men took
large tracts of land north of the county seat, and others below
the old lake benches. Once broken the farms yielded abund-
      —
antly 25 to 30 bushels. Naught caused expense save planting
and harvesting, for the second crop went in on the stubble of
the first, and the third on that of the second. June-grass seized
the country; soil moisture exhausted, the land could not support
both wheat and grass, and so the wheat died, and thousands of
acres of this barbed brome whitened under the July sun.
     Other men are now painfully returning these lands te a
producing condition. As if only to prove that the fault lay not
in land, a single farmer in that part of the valley grew crops
                                           —
every year. He, however, plowed deeply generally in the fall
and grew but one crop in two seasons. Neither did he scorn the
disk and spike-tooth harrow. His irrigated fields also prospered
under careful manuring, rotation, irrigation, and weeding. To
be sure, other people had varied with but incidental success, because of unsystematic farming on a small scale.
     Superstition, too, has played its unworthy part. There is a
type of mind in which the mysterious dies hard. Even today

<!-- page:343 -->

THE OLD AND THE NEW IN AGRICULTURE                343

there are a few men who persist in the belief that there is a
close relationship between crop production and that astronomy
which is found in almanacs. Intelligent farmers study the season and the soil conditions in order to determine the proper
time for sowing and reaping, whereas a more slothful few still
stick to the "dark" or the "light" of the moon as a guide. The
day of astrological agriculture is long past. We stand on the
newer and surer ground of scientific experimentation.
                       The Old and the New
    Thus does the old survive beside the new.        Pass six or
eight years.  In districts of extensive cultivation the wornout
farm is as rare as was the well-kept one of ten years ago in
that valley. Like a ghost, spreading a night-mare of consternation and fear, the old passed by, leaving in its wake the new,
full of   hope and scientific trust. For in most sections faith in
dry-farms has sprung up.    Just as the railroad and the telegraph
carried our frontier across the West in a single lifetime, so the
Experiment Station, the College with its Extension Department,
and the new farmers are carrying scientific agriculture across in
one generation. In spite of this, some still refuse to rotate alfalfa, oats, and sugar-beets, or to harrow the alfalfa after the
first crop in order that they may rid the land of weevil and
June-grass.
     The greater profit of better farming will soon stir these to
action.
     In farm machinery the same progress is noted. The scythe,
the cradle and the flail are still in the memory of middle-aged
inhabitants; and yet mowers with six-foot cutter-bars, combined
harvesters, disk harrows, and steam threshers and plows work
daily upon thousand-acre farms. Hand plows and spike-tooth
harrows still serve useful purposes. Although he must be upto-date, the farmer must beware of machinery and methods too
new to be tried thoroughly.
     Education goes apace. Every means of communication
carries ideas to the wide-awake.      With eyes open and senses
alert, the tiller of the soil catches each new truth heralded in
farm paper, extension talk, book, or bulletin. The recent idea
of progress goes everywhere, and opens the way for still more
recent ones, and these in turn for others yet to come.
     We have just begun to realize how vast is the field of experimental agriculture and home economics. The labor union
protects the industrial worker; the Farm Bureau furnishes
a rallying point for rural betterment.     As we have outgrown
the old, so shall we wrench loose the bands that now bind us.
Hereafter the farmer will have something to say about his
future. Only thus can his problems be solved.
