---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Smith, Joseph F.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 21
number: 1
published: 1917-11
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Joseph F. Smith, "Principles of Government in the Church," *Improvement Era* 21, no. 1 (November 1917): 3–10.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2101unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera2101unse
start_page: 3
end_page: 10
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1917-11)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2101unse
  publication_year: 1917
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1917, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Principles of Government in the Church

<!-- page:3 -->

IMPROVEMENT ERA
Vol. XXI                   NOVEMBER, 1917                          No. 1



Principles of Government in the Church*

                        By President Joseph F. Smith

     My Brethren and Sisters: I am very pleased to meet with
you in this new building. I hope you will continue your efforts
without ceasing until you have it completed and fully paid for,
that it may be dedicated as a house of worship, where you may
assemble and be instructed in the principles of the gospel. We
are making this journey through the South, and meeting with
the people in the settlements along our way for the purpose of
preaching the gospel unto them. We want to visit with you
and look into your faces that we may become better acquainted
with you, and to have you look at us that you may know what
manner of men we are, and that it is our mission to serve you,
and do what good we can for you, and to labor in the interest of
your welfare, to give you instruction and advice such as we feel
that you need, and which will be beneficial, that you may be
strengthened in your faith and determination to serve the Lord,
keeping     all his   commandments.
        We desire to preach the gospel unto you.       Your president,
Brother Wilford Day, called on the First Presidency a short
time ago. He had some conversation with us, and made some
few complaints becaues of indifference on the part of some of
the members of the Church, and the lack of support given by
some to those who have been chosen to hold positions of re-
sponsibility in the stake and in the wards.  We told him we
would have to come to his stake and preach the gospel to the
people, for evidently, from his report to us, that is what is
needed here. Now I see before me men and women of long
experience in the Church, men and women who ought to be,

    *An address to the Saints of Parowan Stake, delivered September 13,
1917,on the occasion of the recent missionary journey South, of President
Smith and party.

<!-- page:4 -->

—


4                      IMPROVEMENT ERA

and I suppose should be without question, acknowledged to be
thoroughly grounded in the faith and in the knowledge of the
principles of the gospel of Christ; men and women who thor-
oughly understand the order of the priesthood, the rights of the
priesthood, the right of presidency, and the responsibilities that
rest upon those who are chosen and set apart and endowed with
authority to preside in the midst of the House of Israel. I pre-
sume there are those here who could teach me a great deal
                             —
perhaps more than I know in relation to these things. I do
not profess to be able to teach you anything that the Lord has
not revealed. I have nothing that is not found written in the
word of the Lord as it has come to us through the instrumental-
ity of the chosen of God, Joseph the Prophet, and his associates
who have succeeded in the presiding authority of the Church
since the day of the Prophet Joseph Smith.       What they have
done, the rules they have inaugurated and established, the cus-
toms and manners by which they have directed the affairs of
the Church are open before us. Every man has a right to look
at them and see for himself.      So has every woman, because
women are responsible for their acts just as much as men are
responsible for theirs, although the man, holding the authority
of the priesthood, is regarded as the head, as the leader; there is,
therefore, a greater responsibility resting upon him than upon-
the woman. Furthermore, when we speak of the men, we speak
of the women, too, for the women are included with the men
and are an inseparable part of mankind. When blessings come
to men, they are shared by the women.

        Order of the Priesthood in Church Government
     Now, what is our duty, in relation to the organization of
the Church?   If I live in a ward and have my standing there,
as a member of that ward, what is my duty in that ward with
reference to the direction, and counsel, and guidance, and judg-
ment, and decision of the bishop and his counselors in that
ward?   What is my duty? Can you tell me what my duty is
with reference to the authority of the bishopric of the ward in
which I live? I can tell you in one moment.

                          The Bishopric
    It is my duty to honor the bishopric of my ward.     It is my
duty to hold in reverence the authority of the bishopric of the
ward in which I live; and if the bishopric in that ward have any
business with me and my neighbor, and they render a decision
with respect to the differences between me and my neighbor,
though their decision be against my will and my thought, it is
my business and my duty to observe and obey the decision of

<!-- page:5 -->

PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT IN THE CHURCH                 5



my bishopric, unless I have reason and good evidence that
the judgment has been rendered partially and without due con-
sideration.

              The Stake Presidency and High Council

    In the event that the bishop's decision is perhaps partial in
my opinion, there is another course for me to obtain what I be-
lieve to be justice and righteousness in my case. What is that?
Shall I go over the heads of the presidency and the high council
of the stake, and make my appeal?       Shall I ignore them, and
lay my complaint before the presiding authorities of the Church,
in order to have the decision of the bishop amended or reviewed?
No, that is not my business. What shall I do, if they have not
dealt justly with me? I have a right to appeal to the president
of the stake and his counselors, and the high council of that
stake, and they possess power and authority to deal with me
to the full extent of my fellowship in the Church    —  they have
a perfect right to do it.     We hold that the presidency of a
stake of Zion will be required to exercise that authority and not
throw it on to us. We have enough to do without carrying their
burdens, or taking from them responsibilities which rightly
devolve upon them. We have concluded not to do that. So,
therefore, if I am not satisfied with the decision of my bishop
and his counselors, after they have heard the evidence in my
case and rendered a decision, and I have reasonable cause
for believing that the decision is not just, not what it ought to
be, then I have the liberty and the right of appeal to the
presidency of the stake and high council, and they will take it
up. Instead of three high priests listening to the evidence, there
will be the three high priests in the presidency of the stake,
twelve high priests in the council, and these fifteen high priests
in the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints will certainly
weigh my complaint and my case, consider it thoroughly, from
every angle and point of view, and in ninety-nine times out of
a hundred they will render a just and impartial judgment.
Therefore, ninety-nine times out of a hundred it becomes my
bounden duty to receive the judgment of the high council and
not appeal it.

      The First Presidency of the Church and the Twelve

     But even then, after the presidency of the stake and high
council have decided my case, if I feel that still I have evidence
that they have not properly considered, or properly weighed the
evidence produced, or that I can bring forth at another trial,
review, or rehearing, if permitted to do so by the First Presi-
dency of the Church of Christ, then I can appeal my case from

<!-- page:6 -->

6                       IMPROVEMENT ERA

the decision of the high council to the Presidency of the Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.    If it is a case of sufficient
importance, and the Presidency of the Church are not really
satisfied with reference to the decision of the high council, they
may, if they desire, call to their assistance the Twelve Apostles.
They may sit in council and decide the case, and from their
decision there is no appeal.       Now, that is the order of the
Priesthood.

           The Proper Order of Settling Difficulties

     There have been complaints sent to the First Presidency of
the Church over the decisions of bishops in cases that have come
to us before they were heard in the proper way in the stakes
where the difficulties have occurred. The case is not heard by
the high council. It is heard by the bishopric, and then the
parties aggrieved have, in some cases, gone over the heads of
local authorities and asked that one or two of the apostles or
that somebody else should be sent there to take up the case and
try it, after it has been decided by the bishop.     For a number
of years there have been a few cases of this character that have
been responded to without reference to the proper procedure
in such matters.     Apostles have been sent all the way from Salt
Lake to consider local difficulties.     I have known apostles to
be sent away over to a stake in Colorado to settle difficulties
that should have been settled by the bishopric and left there.
Or if not left there, they should never have gone beyond the
high council.      But, in order to do justice, in order to show
mercy, in order to be lenient, in order to yield to the appeals
of those who were aggrieved, and because they were aggrieved,
the Presidency of the Church have sent the apostles or others
to settle difficulties entirely out of order; and we are going to
stop that. We will not do it any more. The local authorities
of the Church are now held, by the Presidency of the Church,
and by the Twelve Apostles, as authorized and qualified and
amply empowered with authority to decide all matters that per-
tain to membership in the stake in which they reside.      We will
recruire them to handle all such difficulties, and we will not
listen to any complaints, from any individual, that do not come
in the regular order of appeal as it is designated in the law of
God. Now, this is the proper order of settling difficulties among
the Latter-day Saints.

                 Examples of Men Who Offend

    An adulterer, when proved beyond doubt, who will not re-
pent of his sins, should be called up before the bishop's council

<!-- page:7 -->

PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT IN THE CHURCH                   7



in the ward, and there he should be disfellowshiped, and that
action of the bishopric should be reported up to the high coun-
cil, who hold the higher authority of the priesthood, and when
they consider the action or the matter and find that the decision
of the bishopric is just and right, then it becomes the duty of
the high council and presidency of the stake to cut the offender
off from the Church ; because an adulterer, if he will not repent,
is not entitled to a membership in the Church of Jesus Christ
of Latter-day Saints. He is a pest-breeder; he is a nuisance.
He is not worthy of a standing in the Church, and he ought to
be disfellowshiped, and he ought to be excommunicated from
the Church, inasmuch as he persists in his unrepentance and the
pursuit of his wickedness. Now, all manner of crime may be
                               —
dealt with upon the same basis I mean crimes that would justly
bar membership in the Church.
     A man who says he does not believe in the atoning blood of
Jesus Christ, who professes to be a member of the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, but who ignores and repudiates
the doctrine of the atonement, and the fact, revealed to us and
which is a part of our religion, that God our heavenly Father is
                           —
the Father of Jesus Christ the man who denies that truth and
who persists in his unbelief is not worthy of membership in the
Church. He may be considered harmless and of no great dan-
ger to others, particularly, as long as he keeps his mouth shut
and does not advocate his pernicious doctrines, and be permitted
to remain a member of the Church; but the moment you find
                                                   —
him trying to poison the minds of somebody else the innocent,
                               —
the unsuspecting, the unwary trying to sow the seeds of death
and apostasy and unbelief and infidelity in the minds of inno-
cent people, that moment it becomes the duty of the bishop of
the ward where the man resides to take him up and try him,
arid if he is unrepentant and will not confess his sins, disfellow-
ship him and refer him to the high council to be finally dealt
with for his membership in the Church. Let him be cut off;
let him go his wav; but let it be understood that it is because
of his unbelief, his unrepentance, his unwillingness to hearken
to the law of God, and to the right of the presidency in the Holy
Priesthood of the Church.
     Now, there are manv other things. These are only inci-
dents. Here is a man who savs:       "I do not have any faith in
the bishop. I do not like the bishop. I do not believe in him,
he is incompetent; he is partial; he is unjust: and I will not
sustain him in his position in the Church." What will you do
with such a member? Well, he may be a pestiferous sort of a
person; he mav sav and do a great manv bad or fooli«h things
for himself. For that alone, you can't very well cut him off
from the Church, but you can hold him in disfellowship be-

<!-- page:8 -->

;




8                     IMPROVEMENT ERA

cause of his unwillingness to recognize divine authority; for the
bishop and his counselors, when they are appointed there by
divine authority, have this right. Don't you forget it; they are
there, not because we of our own will put them there.   They are
there because the Lord has designated that as the order of presi-
dency in a ward, by divine authority, and the bishop holds
authority there from God, not from man. Therefore, the man
who says, "I will not fellowship the bishop," and who is obstrep-
erous, and will not yield, may be held in suspense as to the
rights and privileges of the Holy Priesthood.   He may not go to
the temple to get his endowments, or be sealed; he may be
barred. He may not be permitted to be baptized for the dead
because he is in disobedience to the Holy Priesthood; and he
may be held in suspense or be disfellowshiped, although he
may not be cut off from the Church. But if he gets to preach-
ing about it, or sowing the seeds of dissension and of disobe-
dience and rebellion in the hearts of others, he becomes a dan-
gerous person, poisoning the minds of the innocent, misleading
those who are unwary, stirring up dissension and discontent in
the hearts of those who ought to be in harmony with the bishop
and with the ward, and thereby sowing the seeds of disunion,
disorganization and disintegration. Such a man becomes dan-
gerous, although he may be moral and virtuous, and a strictly
temperate man, so far as his life is concerned. At the same time
he is persisting in a wrong course. He is persisting in that which
is in opposition to the Priesthood and to the organizations of
the Church.
     Therefore, he is in opposition to divine authority; he is
sowing the seeds of dissension in the hearts of others; and if he
carries that to the extreme, like the murderer or the adulterer,
or like the thief and the robber, he may be dealt with for his
fellowship in the Church and for his membership, and be cut
off from the Church, just for his rebellion.     I don't care how
much he professes to believe in the gospel. What! A man
profess to believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ and yet rebel
against the very principle that the Lord has instituted to secure
the rightful government of his people, the rightful conduct of
the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints? He profess to
be a Latter-day Saint and to understand the principles of the
gospel? Why, it is nonsense! When a man says:          "I am a
Latter-day Saint; I am a member of the Church, in good stand-
ing, because I know what the principles of the gospel are, and
I know what the principles of government are in the Church,"
for than man to say, "I oppose the bishop because I don't like
him" or "because I haven't faith in him," is proof by that very
act, that he does not understand the principle of government
and submission to divine authority.    He therefore becomes

<!-- page:9 -->

:;




         PRINCIPLES OF GOVERNMENT IN THE CHURCH                     9


obstreperous, unyielding, ungovernable, undesirable, and worthy
to be dealt with according to his merits or demerits.


                Offenders Must be Proved Guilty

    Now, these are some of the things that belong to the gov-
ernment of the Church, the Priesthood of the Son of God. I
know whereof I speak, and no man can dispute what I say from
the law of God. I have been led to these remarks by the
thought that perhaps some people may be called up for their
misconduct and be tried. They should be given every chance,
of course, to rebut the accusations made against them, although
we do not expect a man to prove his innocence. If a man is
accused we do not expect him to prove his innocence in the
Church any more than he would be expected to prove his inno-
cence under the laws of the land.      We  expect the evidence to
be brought to prove his guilt beyond all question, if he is guilty
and when we receive that evidence we must deal with it accord-
ing to righteous principles, exercising all the mercy and charity
we can, looking always for the salvation of men and not for
their destruction.

         Blessings and Counsel for the Local Assembly

    I do not think it would be fair for     me to occupy all the time
this morning.   I want to say to you, however, that we have come
here, my brethren and sisters, to look at you. I have been look-
ing at these young men and these boys in the choir. I am proud
of you boys. I look around here at these young ladies, and I
hear them sing, and I am pleased with them. From the depths
of my soul I bless them, and I bless these boys. They come
here to give their voices, their time, to be in submission to those
who teach them to sing. Music is a part of the worship of God,
and it is essential to our happiness and joy; and I bless you,
boys and girls. I remember, one time, being in a great confer-
ence in Sanpete when there was not a boy in the choir. I asked
"Where are the boys?" The whole choir was composed of young
ladies, and even the leader was a young lady.    I was very pleased
with the ladies to be not only singing but leading the choir; so
I  asked the bishop about it.      "0," he said, "the boys would
rather go fishing or hunting than sing." I pity them; they have
my pity if not my contempt. Singing Why, thought they, that
                                        !


is a girl's business
                   ; and to sing in a choir, above all things, is the
most insignificant thing to a man who could go fishing and hunt-
ing on Sunday, and riding wild horses. Now, what would that
condition of mind bring us to? If a boy can sing, it is more
honorable, it is more manly, and saint-like, to come here and
sing than to go anywhere he pleases without regard to the wishes

<!-- page:10 -->

10                     IMPROVEMENT ERA

of anybody else on the Sabbath day.      Yet there are some boys
who feel humiliated if they sing in the choir. What a depraved
condition of mind a boy must have who feels that way. I am
happy you do not feel that way, and I bless you, because you
are on the right track. Keep it up. Learn to sing, and by and
by some of you good singers, with rare voices, can have them
trained so you will stand at the head of the choir and sing before
the hosts of angels. But if you go riding horses on Sunday, and
fishing and hunting, and neglect your duties in life, you will
not even get inside, when you go there, let alone being in the
choir.   You will not know how to sing, unless you try, while
you are here, to do the best you can.
     I am looking at you, my brethren and sisters, and what do
I see?   I see the faces of men and women here who are worthy
of all honor. I look at these mothers here, whose heads are as
white as snow, and who have borne the burdens in the heat of
the day, mothers and fathers who have stood the test of trial,
poverty, distress, danger and exposure, and every other experi-
ence that they have been called to pass through. They are here
today to worship God and to honor the presence of their
brethren who are working for the upbuilding of Zion, with all
their heart, might, mind and strength.       I bless you for it, and
I am glad to see you; and if any of you have felt a little rebel-
lious, or a little careless, or a little indifferent toward the au-
thorities, the presidency of the stake, the high council, your
bishops, in the past, I bespeak for you repentance of that feeling
and an abandonment of it; that you may become united in the
fellowship of the council of Jesus Christ, as members of the
wards in which you live, as members of the stake to which you
belong, and as members of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-
day Saints.
     We cannot afford to be at loggerheads with one another.
We cannot afford to be contending with one another, finding
fault with one another, disputing against the authority of the
Holy Priesthood. Those few who have ever been guilty of such
a thing as that ought to think of it now, and repent of it, and
never do it again while they live. I tell you the Lord is taking
account of us. We are individually in His presence; we are
individually a unit of the Kingdom of God, of the household of
faith; and the Lord has cognizance of us, and will take note of
us, and will record our works and our deeds.     Thank God for
that noble, that just, that godlike principle of the gospel of
Jesus Christ, that every one of us will have to give an account
for the deeds we do in the flesh, and that every man will be
rewarded according to his works, whether they be good or evil.
Thank God for that principle; for it is a just principle; it is
Godlike. For such a principle to be miitted from the work of
