---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Young, Levi Edgar
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 20
number: 12
published: 1917-10
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Levi Edgar Young, "The Constitution of the United States," *Improvement Era* 20, no. 12 (October 1917): 1054–1059.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera20012unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera20012unse
start_page: 1054
end_page: 1059
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1917-10)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera20012unse
  publication_year: 1917
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1917, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# The Constitution of the United States

<!-- page:1054 -->

The Constitution of the United States
        An Expression of True Civic Rights and Liberty

        By Levi Edgar Young, Professor of History, University of Utah


        The Constitution of the United States is an expression of
civic  and political liberty, grown and developed on American
soil.   It embodies the highest fundamental rights of man
the right to worship God according to the dictates of conscience,
to speak and write one's principles of interpretation of life's
meaning, the right of trial by jury, and the right to take part
in the Government under which one lives.
     The Constitution was the expression of a political philoso-
phy of a New Age. The eighteenth century witnessed the reali-
zation by man of his own powers and inner light. In all ancient
days, and ancient days lasted until the advent of the Govern-
ment of the United States, it was held that common man had no
right whatever to take part in the government under which he
lived.   The divine right of kingship was a sacred truth, and no
one dared to doubt it. The kings of France and the Stuarts of
England had repeatedly said      Je suis VEtat." This meant that
                                  :
                                      '

                                          '




all laws must come from the king; must be an expression of his
free will. All laws for the people were concessions of the Roy-
alty.
     Ages back in history, the people were beginning to realize
that they, too, had rights and privileges.  It took many cen-
turies for them to come into their rights.  And yet one great
thought has always been common to man in all stages of social
conditions, and this thought is: / am a child of God, blessed
with divine light and understanding. In studying the history of
                     —
primitive peoples their manners, customs, and beliefs, one will
find this statement true.  True, in the terrible struggle man is
required to make at times for existence, this divine truth is for-
gotten, yet when man is fed and clothed, and is part of a social
group, he realizes his powers and moral nature.
    Before the revolution in Europe, man could not rise above
his social level. The economic and political habits of the times
had prevented his realizing his best self. Yet Christianity had
made its way into the world with the eternal message that all
are children of God and are endowed with the divine light to
know God and to attain life immortal by pursuing truth.

<!-- page:1055 -->

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES              1055


    The society of the centuries between the days of Christ and
the dawn of the sixteenth century had fallen into a peculiar
economic condition, known as Feudalism. While Feudalism was
a social condition of serfdom on one side and aristocracy of
wealth on the other, it created a love for government and relig-
ion.   It did not recognize, however, man as an individual, but
man as a part of the state or government. Individual man
counted for nothing in his self-realization. He lived and acted
only for the good of the State.
     Now the Reformation was the time when man began a study
of common things and to apply the results of his knowledge to
the betterment of material conditions of the common man. This
naturally resulted in man looking to new ideals in religion. Not
that he doubted the divine mission of Jesus Christ, but he
doubted the rites and ceremonies that seemed to have little re-
lationship to him whom he worshiped.           This brought about
new forms of worship. Yet the Reformation in Europe was not
frought with great religious changes in beliefs and ceremonies,
but it was a time when man began to better his economic and
political, social, and intellectual conditions.  He was beginning
to come to a knowledge of his inborn freedom       —  the freedom
that is his by divine right.
     Into new lands he went. He sought new climes. The Home
idea was the one impelling force. Home based on ownership of
land. So into the New World he went, and there found a chance
to live a new life. It was indeed a new life. He was again born.
The land he tilled was his, and to him belonged the results of
his work. True, new problems were ever present for solution,
but he brought to bear on his problems his highest moral and
intellectual character, and solved them.      This made him ag-
gressive and resourceful, individualistic and inventive. He came
gradually to a realization of his powers; he began to develop
self-government. In the broad, New World he had a chance to
grow.
     Into this New World the Englishman had brougth with him
a knowledge of the fundamental principles of free government.
Through the ages England had witnessed in her history a con-
tention between her Royal power and the power of the Com-
monality. In the eleventh century we find the right of trial by
jury, and this together with the right to tax, lodged in the
Great Council of the Kingdom, was set down in the Magna
Charta, and every king for all future centuries was forced to
recognize these rights or be forced from the throne. In the
                                               —
seventeenth century the two great documents- the Petition of
                             —
Rights and the Bill of Rights were conceded by the kings, and
these two documents, together with the Great Charter, compose
the Constitution of England. Englishmen were guaranteed:

<!-- page:1056 -->

1056                         IMPROVEMENT ERA
        That all taxes should be raised by the consent of the Parliament of the
malm; there should be freedom of speech and the right to petition the
Crown in case of grievance, and election for parliament and debates shall
be free.


     An Act of Toleration was soon passed, freeing dissenters
from punishment for not attending; the services of the Church of
England, and the censorship of the press was abolished.
     With the landing of the Pilgrims on Plymouth Rock, in
1620, they drew up the celebrated Mayflower Compact, said by
some to be the first constitution in the history of the world. In
it one reads a broader spirit of political and civic rights than
what the people had been used to, and it marks a mile post in
the development of freedom. It reads:

     "In the Name of God, Amen. We, whose names are under written, the
loyal subjects of our dred Sovereign, King James, by the grace of God,
Great Britain, France, and Ireland, King, Defender of the Faith, etc.
     Having undertaken for the glory of God, and advancement of the
Christian faith, and honor of our king and countrie, a voyage to plant the
first colonie in the northern part of Virginia, doe, by these presents, sol-
emnly and mutually, in the presence of God, and one of another, covenant
and combine ourselves together into a civil body politik, for our better
ordering and preservation and furtherance of the ends aforesaid; and by
virtue hereof, to enact, constitute, and frame such just and equal laws,
ordinances, acts, constitutions, offices, from time to time as shall be thought
n'ost meet and convenient for the general good of the Colonie.            Unto
which we promise all due submission and obedience. In witness thereof,
we have hereunto subscribed our names at Cape Cod, the 17th of November,
in the year of the reign of our sovereigne lord, King James of England,
France, and Ireland the eighteenth, and Scotland the fiftv-fourth, Anno
Domini, 1620."

        The Pilgrim fathers to America had high conceptions of
life. While they were children of the times in which they lived,
they came to America in search of homes where they could
educate their children and worship God as they pleased. Earn-
est, sober-minded men, they were actuated in all they did by
deep religious principle. Says Governor Bradford, in his His-
tory of Plymouth Plantation

      "Our fathers were Englishmen, which came over this      great ocean,   and
v   rr ready to perish in the wilderness; but they cried unto ye Lord, and he
heard their voice, and looked on their adversitie.    Let them, therefore,
praise ye Lord, because he is good and his mercies endureth for ever."


      With the settlement of Massachusetts the most democratic
svstem of government developed in the world was established.
This was the town, the New England town, which tvne had be-
come ages before the unit of government in old England.
Tt was a compact group of settlers, with like economic, po-
litical, and religious interests. The voters met once a vear,

<!-- page:1057 -->

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES                1057


or oftener, at which they not only elected their town officers, but
also decided many such things as these: what new roads the
town shall make, what bridges construct, what schools shall be
provided, how the town shall be protected, and what taxes shall
be raised. This, so far as it goes, is government by the people,
pure and simple. Jefferson called the New England town system
"the wisest invention ever devised by the wit of man for the
perfect exercise of self-government, and for its preservation."
     The township government spread into the West, and has
been common to many of the states of the Union. In fact it is
the unit of government in the United States. The "Mormon"
pioneers introduced in into Utah, and in this State, it was one
of the most democratic forms of government ever developed in
America. Unlike the New England form, all were permitted to
vote, and the women took an active part at times in all discus-
sions.
      In the South, the Shire government was developed. It, too,
was democratic in form. The county was the unit of political
life, and it had its shire-gemot, or county meeting, to enact laws
and do business like the town of New England. It has also re-
mained one of our most important units of government in the
United States.
      So, from the beginning of our history, the people began
to learn self-government and to take an active part in the meth-
ods by which they should be governed. The principles of de-
mocracy and liberty derived in the town and shire gave them
their broad and lofty conceptions of what a Nation should be.
The Constitution of the United States is an outgrowth of the
ideas of government that were developed in the colonies, and
which had been born into the hearts of the colonists' fore-
fathers in England.
     Mr. Bryce, in his American Commonwealth, says that the
excellence of the Constitution is due to four causes: First, the
acquaintance of the members of the Convention with the Eng-
lish Constitution; second, the study of Montesquieu and his
Spirit of the Laws; third, familiarity with written constitutions;
and fourth, a knowledge of the Common Law. During the en-
tire Colonial period, the colonists were governed under con-
stitutions which guaranteed their liberties. The Virginia Char-
ter of 1609 provided for a General Assembly or House of Bur-
gesses; Connecticut had an Assembly of three men under the
colonial charter of 1662, which was retained as the State Con-
stitution until 1818. North Carolina had a House of Commons,
and the old charter of Rhode Island served as the Constitution
of the State, until 1842. Every one of the colonies had their
law-making bodies, to watch the interests of the people, and
when the king in 1684 sent Sir Edmond Andross over to be

<!-- page:1058 -->

1058                                                                        IMPROVEMENT ERA

governor of Massachusetts, the people had been born and bred
               and they made life miserable for their new ex-
to their rights,
ecutive when that officer forgot the principle, "govern-
ments resting on the consent of those governed." Increase
Mather, father of Cotton Mather, tells us how the government
went on:
     Their Charters being all           declared to be void           Sir Ed-                   .           .       .                                                           .       .   .


mund Andross              was pitched on, as a fit Instrument to be made use
                                                    .       .       .


of; and            he, with four of his Council
                        .           .       .              are impowered to                                                                             .       .   .


make Laws, and raise moneys on the Kings Subjects, without any Parlia-
ment, Assembly, or Consent of the People.                                                                                                   .       .       .



     Laws are made            indeed what they please: nor are they printed:
                                                                .       .   .



.   .   so that the people are at a great loss to knoiv what is Law and what
        .



not.        .   One Law
                    .           .   doth prohibit all Town-Meetings, except-    .       .           .



ing     .     once a year; whereas the Inhabitants have occasion to meet
                .           .



once a Week, for the Relief of the Poor; or other Town-Affairs.                                                                                                                                 .   .   .


Moneys have been raised             without any consent of the People. Sir          .       .           .


Edmond Andross caused a Tax to be levied of a Penny in a Pound, on all the
Towns then under his Government: and when at Ipswitch, and other places
the Select Men            voted, that inasmuch as it was against the common
                                                    .       .       .


Priviledges of English Subjects to have money raised without their own
Consent            they would petition the King for Liberty of an Assembly
                        .           .       .


before they            [paid any Tax]   .the said Sir Edmond Andross caused
                                                .       .                                                               ;


them to be imprisoned and Fined.                   One of the former Magis-                                                 .   .   .


trates was committed to prison without any Crimes laid to his Charge, and
there kept half a year without any Fault; and,                their new Mas-                                                                                    .   .   .


ters tell them, that their Charter being gone, their Title to their Lands
.   .   .is gone therewith, and that all is the Kings         .;  Accordingly                                                                                       .   .



the Governour ordered the Lands belonging to some in Charles-Town to be
measured out, and given to his Creatures.               These were the miser-                                                           .       .       .



able Effects of New-England's being deprived of their Charters, and with
them of their English iiberties: They have [tried]             to obtain some                                                                                       ...
relief in their sorrowful Bondage     for several Gentelmen desired Increase                                    ;


Mather, the Rector of the Colledge at Cambridge in New-England, to un-
dertake a Voyage for England, to see what might be done            .; amongst                                                                                               .       .


other things the said Mather caused a petition from the Town of Cambridge
in New England to be humbly presented to his Majesty, which                  .                                                                                                                  .   .


shall be here inserted.


     After the Civil War in England, 1689, the people again
obtained their rights, and had their legislative assemblies.
     As early as 1642, there were factors at work in America
which were tending to unite the people politically. In that year
the colonies of New England formed a League for Mutual Pro-
tection, which had a general council of two commissioners from
each colony. This commission met every year until 1664, but
in some respects, it had the functions of a nation. The league
consisted of Massachusetts, Connecticut, New Plymouth, and
New Haven.
     In 1754, Franklin proposed the Albany Plan of Union,
which had for its purpose the uniting of the colonies as a mat-
ter of protection, and in order to bring about a unanimity of
opinion in reference to the French in America. The cause of

<!-- page:1059 -->

THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES                1059


Virginia was looked upon as a common one, and all the colonies
voted to aid her. The French and Indian war affected the in-
terests of all the colonies. While the delegates at Albany voted
against Franklin's plan on the ground that it gave too much
power to the Crown, the Convention indicated the fact that the
time had come when the colonists could unite in resisting a
common foe. While they were widely separated, and distances
in those days were great, there were forces that were tending
to bring all Englishmen in America together under one form of
government.
    In 1764, Parliament passed the Stamp Act.        The next
year the colonists in a convention which met in New York drew
up a petition to the Crown and asked that the Act be repealed.
The Act distinctly took away the right of the colonists to tax
themselves, and this the new American could not tolerate. Now
came forth the "Sons of Liberty" associations, formed all over
the country to oppose the Stamp Act and to work for the cause
of Liberty in all the colonies. The Act was repealed in 1766.
The colonists had opposed not the tax, but the principle on
which it was levied. They held that there could be no taxation
without representation, a principle that had by that time be-
come sacred to them.
     The next great step to bring about the Constitution was
the Declaration of Independence, declared July 4th, 1776. The
war of the Revolution had begun. The colonists were aroused,
and the Second Continental Congress stated: "We are free and
have a right to be free," a political, industrial, and social con-
dition that had gradually come about through America's isola-
tion and long distances from England. For the first time in
history, and as a result of the many generations of men who had
worked for the higher democracy, the fathers of the Congress,
in 1776, said: "We hold these truths to be self evident that all
men are created equal, and are endowed by the Creator with
certain inalienable rights, among which are life, liberty, and the
pursuit of happiness." The Declaration was made effective by
the long war, and the determination of the colonists to main-
tain their "inalienable rights."
     Independence had come. Thirteen governments were un-
organized and swinging in the balance. The Article of Con-
federation which had been drawn up by the United Colonies and
which served as a Constitution was weak, in that it provided for
no Executive to enforce the laws passed by the Legislative power.
Then, too, the colonies were not converted to many of its pro-
visions, and their support of it was spiritless. Something greater
was needed. Commerce and trade was in a bad condition, and as
to who controlled the rivers in America was a question which
had to be settled. Then there was the war debt, and how it
should be paid was the burning question at issue.
