---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Bennett, Fred L. W.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 20
number: 9
published: 1917-07
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Fred L. W. Bennett, "Selling Tobacco, Tea and Coffee," *Improvement Era* 20, no. 9 (July 1917): 797–799.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2009unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera2009unse
start_page: 797
end_page: 799
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1917-07)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2009unse
  publication_year: 1917
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1917, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Selling Tobacco, Tea and Coffee

<!-- page:797 -->

<!-- Source heading: Selling Tobacco, Tea and Coffee. -->



Selling  Tobacco,  Tea  and  Coffee
By  Fred  L.  W.  Bennett
The  writer  is  a  recent  convert  to  "Mormonism"  and  a  still
more  recent  arrival  in  this  country,  and  one  of  the  things  which
has  painfully  surprised  him  is  that  "Mormon"  merchants  carry
a  line  of  tobacco,  teas  and  coffee.  Now,  while  some  may  think
me  hypercritical,  I  think  there  may  be  some  excuse  for  the
Latter-day  Saint  merchant  living  away  from  the  Church  carry-
ing these  articles  (but  of  that  I  am  not  sure) ;  but  I  can  see  none
for  those  doing  business  right  here  in  Zion;  that  is,  if  we  are  to
take  the  Word  of  Wisdom  seriously.  If  it  is  wrong  to  use  an  ar-
ticle it  must  be  equally  wrong  to  make  or  supply  that  article.
Whom  do  we  blame  for  the  liquor  evil  most?  Why,  the  brewer
and  his  retailers,  and  we  aim  to  stop  their  business.  If  they
pleaded  that  their  goods  were  in  demand,  we  should  laugh  at
them;  and  yet  some  would  accept  that  as  a  satisfactory  defense
of  the  Latter-day  Saint  who  makes  and  sells  other  things  which
the  Church  condemns.
Some  with  whom  I  have  discussed  this  subject  assert  that  as
the  articles  I  have  mentioned  cannot  be  regarded  as  so  harmful
or  offensive  as  strong  drinks,  they  ought  not  to  be  condemned
so  strongly.  What  a  doctrine!  If  a  thing  is  wrong,  it  is  wrong.
A  good  citizen  will  not  break  any  law,  and  this  surely  ought  to
be  equally  true  with  the  laws  of  the  Kingdom  of  God!  Others
will  remind  you  of  the  words  "not  by  constraint"  at  the  begin-
ning of  the  revelation,  as  if  that  modifies  it.  But,  if  we  regard
it  as  advice  only,  are  we  to  treat  it  with  any  less  degree  of  re-
spect? Can  we  spurn  His  advice  any  more  than  His  command-
ment and  still  retain  His  love  and  trust?
I  have  traveled  a  great  deal  since  I  have  been  in  this  coun-
try and  the  Latter-day  Saint  family  which  does  not  have  some
member,  at  least,  who  drinks  tea  or  coffee,  seems  to  be  very  rare,
whilst  a  percentage  have  a  "smoker"  or  two.  I  often  wonder
whether  these  persons  really  believe  in  revelation,  and  that  our
beloved  Joseph  Smith  was  a  true  Prophet.  But  whilst  "Mor-
mon" merchants  and  corporations  continue  to  sell  these  "for-
bidden fruits,"  sermons  on  the  Word  of  Wisdom  will  have  very
little  influence  with  the  people.  The  "competition"  argument
is  a  heresy.  If  it  held  true,  we  ought  not  to  look  down  upon  a
Latter-day  Saint  who  keeps  a  saloon?     But  who  would  think  of

<!-- page:798 -->



798  IMPROVEMENT  ERA
making  such  a  brother  an  officer  of  any  kind  in  the  Church,  or
even  a  member?  Carried  to  its  logical  conclusion,  we  should
permit  a  member  of  the  Church  to  cater  to  any  vicious  tastes  or
abominations  if  he  were  in  a  business  where  these  "side  lines"
would  have  to  be  carried  on  in  order  to  meet  competition!
When  one  sells  or  advertises  a  thing,  he  is  not  only  supplying
a  demand,  he  is  helping  to  create  one,  and  this  should  not  be
lost  sight  of  in  a  discussion  of  this  kind.  If  Latter-day  Saint
merchants  would  "cut  out"  the  three  articles  mentioned,  it
would  have  a  tremendous  influence  for  good,  and  the  time  would
soon  come  when  the  stopping  of  the  sale  of  tobacco,  at  least,  in
Utah  would  be  mooted.  A  thing  must  be  put  out  of  the  pale  of
good  society  before  you  can  talk  of  annihilating  it.  I  hope  we
shall  not  wait  for  neighboring  states  to  set  us  the  example  in
this  matter.
The  people  have  been  told  that  if  they  will  be  honest  with
their  God  in  the  matter  of  tithings,  etc.,  they  shall  be  blessed
here  and  now,  as  well  as  store  up  riches  for  themselves  in
heaven.  A  man  who  pays  a  full  tithing  would  seem  to  be  handi-
capped in  life's  race  when  placed  beside  a  man  with  no  religious
ties  demanding  a  substantial  portion  of  his  income.  The  same
applies  to  a  missionary  spending  his  time  and  means  working
for  the  Church  whilst  a  neighbor  in  a  similar  profession  or  bus-
iness stays  with  his  calling.  But  does  paying  tithes  or  doing
missionary  work  gratis  place  one  at  a  disadvantage  in  this  life?
I  have  yet  to  find  that  it  does.  So,  then,  it  is  right  to  urge  Lat-
ter-day Saints  to  do  these  things.  Well,  if  that  is  granted,  let  us
not  be  afraid  to  do  anything  whatsoever  that  is  right  and  de-
manded by  our  faith.    We  must
"Do  what  is  right,
Let  the  consequence  follow."
I  must  hasten  to  assure  the  merchant  I  am  not  condemning
him  alone.  Buyers  have  obligations,  too.  In  these  days  when
so  many  Latter-day  Saints  fail  to  keep  the  Word  of  Wisdom,  the
merchant  (even  if  he  has  considered  it  wrong  to  carry  the  arti-
cles complained  of,  and  many  honestly  do  not)  may  well  hesi-
tate before  observing  the  full  letter  of  the  law.  I  have  heard  of
Latter-day  Saint  merchants  who  refused  at  first  to  handle  tea,
coffee,  or  tobacco,  but  they  were  compelled  to  do  so  or  close
their  doors,  so  they  contend;  but  I  cannot  think  but  that  they
became  frightened  and  followed  the  majority  before  giving  the
plan  a  fair  trial.  There  is  a  bishop  at  St.  Charles,  Idaho,  who
does  not  carry  tobacco  in  his  store  at  the  present  time.  I  have
this  on  the  authority  of  his  son  and  a  number  of  other  persons
who  know  him.  All  honor  to  him  for  his  faith !  I  hope  he  will
become  rich!

<!-- page:799 -->



SELLING  TOBACCO,  TEA  AND  COFFEE  79*
You  wives  and  housekeepers,  mothers  in  Israel,  who  desire
to  "train  your  children  in  the  way  they  should  go,"  our  brethren
in  the  merchant  business  will  not  do  much  on  the  lines  I  have
indicated  without  your  co-operation.  The  righting  of  this  mat-
ter is  really  in  your  hands.  If  your  neighbor  who  keeps  a  storfe
in  your  ward  decides  to  drop  the  things  condemned,  will  you
stand  by  him?  Do  not  complain  if  your  boy  smokes,  if  you  do
not  do  your  part  toward  stopping  the  sale  of  the  objectionable
weed.  I  should  like  to  see  Latter-day  Saint  women  form  them-
selves into  a  league  and  try  to  influence  storekeepers  to  "drop"
tobacco,  at  least.  If  they  would  do  this,  there  would  be  many
merchants  who  would  gladly  listen  to  them,  for  I  do  not  believe
our  Church  merchants  like  handling  the  stuff,  but  feel  com-
pelled to  do  so  at  present.  Others  would  cut  it  out  for  com-
mercial reasons  only,  for  they  would  soon  see  that  the  store
that  continued  to  carry  it  would  be  in  disfavor.  There  is  one
newspaper  in  Salt  Lake  City  that  refuses  to  publish  tobacco  ad-
vertisements on  principle.  Are  you  supporting  that  paper — you
know  which  it  is — in  preference  to  the  others?  If  you  are  not,
do  so!  and  tell  the  other  papers  why.  You  mothers!  Your
power  for  good  is  unlimited.    Will  you  exercise  it?
A
