---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Jensen, Nephi
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 20
number: 5
published: 1917-03
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Nephi Jensen, "Eloquence," *Improvement Era* 20, no. 5 (March 1917): 427–429.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2005unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera2005unse
start_page: 427
end_page: 429
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1917-03)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera2005unse
  publication_year: 1917
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1917, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Eloquence

<!-- page:427 -->

Eloquence
                          By Nephi Jensen

     This is not a set of rules on public speaking. It is not an
attempt at denning eloquence. Nor yet is it a setting forth of
things that should be in a good discourse. It is rather a brief
statement of what should be in the speaker if he would really
be effective.
     Two orators of great note spoke the same evening, from the
same platform, in Salt Lake City, during the recent political
campaign. They were both men of deep thought and extensive
learning.   Both were splendid elocutionists. Both had command of superb diction. And yet the one commanded admiration and the other convinced.    What was the difference in these
two speakers? The one was simply an orator, and the other was
a great man.
     "Eloquence is," as Emerson says, "the best speech of the
best soul."   The greatness that is shown by a deep, genuine,
passionate devotion to the best cause one knows is the most important qualification for effective speaking. No combination of
talents can take the place of the absolute sincerity and earnestness which are characteristics of heroic souls. Rhetoric, elocution and wit are as nothing compared with a great heart's undivided devotion to truth. Every speech that has lived the gen-
(ration after it was spoken has been the joint product of a brain
struggling to solve some gigantic problem of human welfare and
a heart burdened with the woes, wants and sufferings of the race.
     All the really famous orations have been delivered by men
who have had the greatness that puts a noble cause above all
petty personal considerations.     Patrick Henry's thunderbolts,
hurled in the teeth of King George's servile defenders, came from
a heart aflame with the love of liberty.   James Otis' earnest denunciations of the unjust laws passed by the English Parliament
came from a heart that loved justice and right more than the
fawning of the King's powerful agents. Webster's reply to Hayne
was not spoken to the galleries. It was a passionate appeal of a
<rreat patriot who could imagine no misfortune more direful
than the severing of the Union. Lincoln's immortal Gettysburg
speech is the joint product of an almost perfectly balanced brain
and a heart of infinite tenderness.
    Art is the servant of beauty; eloquence     is   the servant of

<!-- page:428 -->

428                       IMPROVEMENT ERA

truth.  Only that speech is really eloquent that makes truth
teem true. Any discourse, no matter how polished in form, that
attracts attention to itself or the  manner of its delivery is a
failure.   Conversely, any speech no matter how elegant in form,
is effective if the thoughts speak louder than the words.    There
is nothing so fatal to genuine eloquence as the vanity, that seeks

its own glory rather than the winning of human hearts to truth.

"The surest sign that a man is not great is that he strives to look
great."
      Some one has said that a "woman should not sing unless her
heart   is broken."   It is equally good advice to say that one
should not preach unless his soul is so mellow that the "streams
of truth will roll through his soul in song." The Book of Job,
one of the world's best pieces of literature, came from a heart of
this kind.    So have all the truly great songs, sermons, poems,
and stories of the race.
     Small souls are more concerned about form than substance.
It is a mark of the great that they put substance first and form
second. Form is something, substance is everything. "The letter killeth, but the spirit giveth life." It is for this reason that
often some great soul, passionately devoted to some noble cause,
will step onto a platform and commence to speak right from
his heart the truest things his heart knows, and captivate the
hearts of his hearers. About two years ago a signal circumstance
of this kind occurred in Memphis, Tennessee. The speaker wa^
President Joseph F. Smith. His subject was "The Gospel of
Christ." Of his manner of speaking and the effect produced,
the Memphis Commercial Appeal, the next morning said:

     "President Smith is positive in speech. He is a speaker of great force.
Nothing he said last night could be construed as out of the ordinary at all.
But as he voiced the plea it was not quite usual. He did not seem to be
trying for an effect, but he did secure one.   Several of the women who
were present held their handkerchiefs to their eyes; several men almost
seemed worried. There were plenty of unbelievers in the crowd, but all
                                   —
listened to him with great attention even smiles were lacking."

    It was not fine phrases that mellowed these fastidious women
into sympathetic rapport with a speaker who pleaded the cause
of religion that has no pomp nor splendor to commend it to the
worldly-minded. It was not pretty sentiments spoken with the
graces of formal elocution that made these men "seem almost
worried." What was the real secret of this unique triumph of
speech making?     Character and conviction. His words were
the simple words of truth coming warm from a heart aglow
with the knowledge and love of the truth. That is the only
effective speech. That also is genuine eloquence.

<!-- page:429 -->

ELOQUENCE                           429

     Eloquence is deeper and truer than art. It is more than
sentimentalism that speaks in fine phrases. It is the genuine,
earnest outpouring of a heart of undivided devotion to a great
cause. The deep conviction, born of a genuine, unselfish concern
about the big problems of life and human welfare, is the very
heart of effective speech. Eloquence, like truth, loves the
depths. Shallow minds cannot compass it. Empty hearts may
strive for it but they will strive in vain. Only he who has a soul
deep enough to be earnest, true enough to be honest, and great
enough to put his cause above every personal ambition, really
speaks eloquently. There is nothing so fatal to effective speech
as a striving for effect.    Nothing sets an audience of earnest
people against a speaker, like the impression that he is trying
to "make a speech" rather than tell what is really in his heart.
''A fine speech," said O'Connel, "is an elegant thing, but the
sentence that is worth while is the sentence that wins the heart
to truth." In speaking, as in every other art, the result obtained
is the real test of the performance.       Fine phrases gracefully
?poken may win from our lips the tribute, "it is fine;" but real
eloquence wins from our hearts the tribute, "it is true."
     Socrates said, "any one can speak eloquently on a subject
he knows." This is only another way of saying that borrowed
light is only twilight.     A poem is not composed of thoughts
others have thought. It is the actual expression of the truth
and beauty a great soul has experienced and lived. So is eloquence.      It is for this reason that when a man of the pure
earnestness of a Smith, a Grant or a Penrose speaks right from
his heart, the deep truth about God and human responsibility
to God, which he has felt and lived, that our souls are stirred
to their very depths, and we feel as if the fine words of a mere
reciter of phrases would be a mockery.
     "Eloquence," says Webster, "must exist in the man." It is
not a patch work of borrowed literary trappings. It is the actual
expression of an intense soul's certainty of the majesty of truth.
It is more.    It is the warm pulsating spirit of truth carried on
the wings of words to hearts yearning for the harmony that is
found only close to the things that are eternally true. For one
void of faith, hope and charity to preach were like the singing of
some one whose heart is a stranger to melody. The saying "one
cannot give what he has not" is truer of conviction than of
thought. One might on occasion borrow a thought, but he cannot borrow a great soul's certainty of the final triumph of right.
"If you want to be eloquent," says Goethe, "be honest; or, in
other words, if you want to be eloquent think deeply, feel
deeplv, live truly, and express just what you think, feel and
live."'
