---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Joseph M. Tanner
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 19
number: 9
published: 1916-07
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Joseph M. Tanner, "What the Nations of Europe Are Fighting For," *Improvement Era* 19, no. 9 (July 1916): 816–819.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1909unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera1909unse
start_page: 816
end_page: 819
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1916-07)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1909unse
  publication_year: 1916
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1916, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# What the Nations of Europe Are Fighting For

<!-- page:816 -->

What the Nations of Europe are Fighting for

                    BY DR. JOSEPH M. TANNER

     What are the European nations really fighting for? That is
a question often put by those who think the great conflict now
on is something wholly unnecessary, without purpose, and with-
out the promise of any ultimate good.       There was never in all
the history of the world so many and such deep-rooted causes
for war as exist at the present time in Europe. When two farm-
ers meet at the head of an irrigation ditch, quarrel about the
water which each thinks it is his right and his turn to use, and
they fight because of their trouble, that is very simple.       Man's
financial interests from the beginning of time have been potent
causes of discontent and strife.      The financial interests of the
world have grown, in late years, with lighting rapidity, and the
tension between the nations of the world, therefore, has be-
come all the greater. The causes of the present war are compli-
cated.    They cover a period of more than forty years. They
lepresent intrigue, unfair competition, national aspirations, jus-
tice, and among all of them, the fundamental rights of humanity.
      In view of the fact that peace is sure to come, and that the
differences that now cause war must be adjusted, it is important
that intelligent people have the justice of their judgments con-
 form to the great results which a future treaty of peace will
bring about. The position of the American people, as neutrals,
 requires that their opinions be impartial.     That does not mean
 that they may not be pronounced on any single line of conduct
 by the great belligerents now at war. Forming judgments of a
 single act of conduct, and judgments upon complicated actions,
 are two very different things. What a man may think about a
 single act, and a whole series of complicated acts, are different
 things, or, at any rate, should be.    Faults of this great war are
 not all on one side, and it is the purpose of this article and others
 which may follow, to set forth some of those international compli-
 cations that grew beyond pacific settlement and therefore had to
 be adjusted by force of arms. The war began in Serbia and was
 the inevitable result of the so-called Balkan trouble a trouble
                                                          ;

 out of which statesmen often predicted war for many years. Let
 us be specific and take the case of Austria.
      The German element, and the Hungarian element, and the
 Austro-Hungarian empire, are in the minority, but they are more
 compact than the majority element, consisting of Rumanians,

<!-- page:817 -->

WHAT THE NATIONS ARE FIGHTING FOR                        817

Italians and Slavs.      It was, of course, the policy of
                                                          Austria to see
to   it   that no one of these elements became dangerously
                                                              powerful
m any concentrated part of the dual empire.           The Slavs in Bo-
hemia and the north side of the empire were out of touch
                                                           with
the Slavs in the south, along the Danube.     The Rumanians, in
the east in Transylvania could have little in common
                                                             with their
kindred,— the Italians in southwestern Austria. The only place
where a strong, dangerous Slavic element could concentrate was
in the south, under the leadership of some Balkan
                                                     Slavic state
that might become dangerously powerful.       After the two Bal-
kan wars were fought— the first between the Balkan allies and
Turkey, and then between Bulgaria and the other Balkan allies,
Austria became feverishly excited over the prospects of a power-
ful Serbia, and over the fact that the great seaport
                                                     of Salonica,
which had been the political ambition of Austria, was taken by
the Greeks.
     The new Serbia was not in itself a menace to Austria it was;

too small.  But the new Serbia in conjunction with the great
Slavic masses who were Austrian subjects in Croatia, Slavonia,
Bosnia, Hertzegovina, and Istria, might, in conjunction with
some other nation, become sufficiently strong to resist Austria.
Among this Slavic element there was unrest, discontent, and often
rebellious attitude.   Nor can we wonder at this.
      This Slavic element has never enjoyed even the most fun-
damental rights of life, liberty and property. Austrian methods
of government have encouraged strife among the people largely
because of their religious differences. Some of these Slavs be-
long to the Orthodox or Greek church, others belong to the Roman
Catholic church. The Austrian government has encouraged re-
ligious differences and discriminated herself against the orthodox
classes.   Take Bosnia as an example. There is in that country
four times as much expended for its police system as is ex-
pended for schools. The division of the population of the coun-
try will show the injustice to which the people have long been
subjected.    In Bosnia there are eight hundred thousand Greek
orthodox, five hundred thousand Roman. Catholics, and six hun-
dred thousand Mohammedans or moslems. It will be seen that of
Bosnia's two million people there is practically only one hundred
thousand of all other classes.     In the German parts there is one
school for every seven hundred in the population among the Slavs
                                                      ;

there is only one school for every six thousand of population the   ;

offices are nearly all held by the Germans whose opportunities for
education are liberal, while the Slavic element is kept in a state
of unbearable ignorance. Nearly all the offices are held by Ger-
mans and even where Bosnians themselves go to Vienna for a
college training they are denied the opportunity of political em-
ployment by the government, and the industries of that country

<!-- page:818 -->

818                  IMPROVEMENT ERA
sre almost entirely in the hands of the Germans who naturally
give preference to their own nationality. The result is that to
ambitious and educated Bosnians the cloors of opportunity are
closed, and discontent is rife.    Such gross injustice makes the
students of that nationality violent towards Austria. They are
revolutionary in their agitations. The Austrians and those of the
world who do not know them call them anarchists.
     Austria has given to the Bosnians a legislature called "Sa-
bor," but all of the laws passed by this legislature may be vetoed
by the Hungarian parliament, sitting at Budapest, or by the Aus-
trian parliament, sitting at Vienna.      This "Sabor" is more a
source of aggravation than one of satisfaction to the people.
Men are elected to it according to their religious beliefs. It is
composed of one Jew, sixteen Catholics, twenty-four Moham-
medans, and thirty-one Greek orthodox. While the law establish-
ing the Sabor gives to the people certain political and economic
rights, the law is saddled by one of those jokers which offers with
one hand a privilege, or a right, that is snatched away by the
other. This native legislature, or this Sabor, may be suspended,
and all the rights and privileges accorded to it, taken away when
in the judgment of the government at Vienna it is necessary for
the safety of the empire. In that legislative body the people are
punished for speeches that are not approved by the Austrian gov-
ernment.
      Perhaps one of the greatest sources of revolutionary agita-
tion is found in the treatment of the peasants or farmers. When
the Turks captured the country they parcelled out the lands into
districts ruled by a Turkish "bey" who was not unlike the feudal
barons of medieval times.      These beys were held more in re-
straint by the Turkish government, at Constantinople, in the mat-
ters of injustice to the peasants than they had been by the govern-
ment at Vienna. The system was continued when the Austrians
took over the military control of Bosnia. The people there had
their large commons upon which thev enjoyed collective right to
pasture their hogs and their cattle. These lands belonged to the
people collectively.   Austria, anxious to settle certain parts of
the country by Germans, took these commons away from the peo-
ple, and aided much thereby to destroy their livestock industry.
It is true that Austria has built up the country, constructed beau-
tiful public buildings, and brought much so-called civilized life
to the country, but those are advantages that are not enjoyed as a
rule by the people at large. They are advantages of a privileged
class, and the result is that, from this and other circumstances,
which will be related at another time, the people of the Balkans
have been in a state of seething discontent. Haki Pasha when
war was threatened between Italy and Turkey is said to have
made the following prophetic declaration     :   "If Italy declares

<!-- page:819 -->

WHAT THE NATIONS ARE FIGHTING FOR                     819

war on Turkey, the cannon will not cease to speak until all Europe
is in   a conflagration."   .

        The reason was perhaps  simple.  The aspirations of the
great powers in the Balkans were irreconcilable. For forty years
the people of that country have been subject to all kinds of in-
trigues carried on shamelessly for the supposed benefit of one or
the other of all the great powers now at war. The Balkan ques-
tion was one that international diplomacy was absolutely helpless
to cope with.     Peaceful means were inadequate; justice must
sometimes prevail, and justice meant war.

                         Good Spiritual Conditioh
     Elder Thomas M. Argyle, president of the Hull conference, Eng-
land, April 20:   "This part of the Lord's vineyard is in an excellent
spiritual condition.  At our April conference we were favored with
the good companionship of President Hyrum M. Smith and Elder
J. M. Sjodahl.   Our attendance was fair considering the many obliga-
tions the Saints have to meet, caused through the present-day mode
of warafre.    We rejoice to think God has preserved us, and take great
joy in rendering unto him our heartfelt thanks and feel it our duty
10 depend upon him for our future safety.   These are the elders labor-
ing in the Hull conference, left to right, back row:     Lorin Passey,

Provo- Floyd W. Nielson, Bluff; Horace O. Hall, Hyrum; Peter M.
Hixson, East Mill Creek; Joseph A. Godfrey, Clarkston; front row:
Thomas E. Vance, Fairview; J. M. Sjodahl, Liverpool office; Hyrum
                                        Thomas M. Argyle, Woods
M Smith President European Mission; Jorgensen,
Cross, president of conference; Nils C.         Union, Utah, sec-
 retary of conference.
