---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - John Henry Evans
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 19
number: 8
published: 1916-06
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'John Henry Evans, "The Use of the Tongue," *Improvement Era* 19, no. 8 (June 1916): 720–724.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1908unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera1908unse
start_page: 720
end_page: 724
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1916-06)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1908unse
  publication_year: 1916
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1916, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# The Use of the Tongue

<!-- page:720 -->

—

                  The Use of the Tongue

BY JOHN HENRY EVANS, OF THE LATTER-DAY SAINTS UNIVERSITY

     [This is the introductory chapter to a book entitled "The Spoken
Word," by the            —
                   author a manual of conversation, story-telling,
public speaking, and debating. It is now in the press and will soon
be on sale. Editors.]

      To become proficient in conversation, story-telling, public
                                                          —
speaking, and debating, three things are indispensable abundant
practice, careful study of general principles, and constant self-
criticism with a view to improvement.
                       —                    —
      The first of these plenty of practice lies ready to the hand
of any young person in the Church who is at all ambitious to suc-
ceed in any of these arts.
      In conversation, besides the usual opportunities in a social
way that fall to the lot of every one, the Latter-day Saint has at
least two avenues not open to the lay member of any other church.
One of these is ward teaching. Scores of men, young and old,
in all our communities visit families every month for the purpose
of conversing with them on religious topics. And then there are
the house to house visits of the regular missionary away from
home. Perhaps the largest and most important part of the foreign
missionary's work nowadays consists of conversations at the fire-
side.  A  successful missionary will have a hundred conversations
where he will deliver one sermon.Now, since every young man
among us may be both a foreign missionary and a ward teacher,
there lies before him additional chances for the exercise of the
graces of conversation that lend such charm to social intercourse.
     Then consider the opportunities our young men and women
have for the use of the story-teller's art. If they are Sunday
school teachers, or teachers in the Primary Association, the Re-
ligion Class, or one of the Improvement organizations, they will
be called upon to test their ability as story-tellers very frequently,
and more frequently as time goes on, since the story is increas-
ingly regarded as one of the most powerful and popular means of
instruction at our disposal.    And nearly every adult among us,
as a matter of fact, is in one or more of these organizations. Be-
sides, the home is made more of by our people than by others,
and who that has anything to do with children in the home,
whether in the capacity of parent or uncle or aunt or just a friend
to the youngsters, but has to pay a heavy tax for his gift of
story-teller ?

<!-- page:721 -->

THE USE OF THE TONGUE                         721

     And what mere layman of any other religious demonination
has so many opportunities for public speaking as does the average
member of the "Mormon" Church? Our preaching being done
mainly by the lawyer, the doctor, the teacher, the business man,
the farmer, the mechanic, and the man of no particular calling,
instead of by a class of men who make preaching a profession,
every one in the Church with the least disposition to do so, even
women, may obtain practice in this activity out of all proportion
to his special training in the art. In the sacrament meetings, in the
priesthood quorums, in the auxiliary associations, in the mission
field at home and abroad, there's a very great demand for public
                               —
speaking. And not only so the demand is increasing every year,
not only in quantity but also in quality.
      Finally, there is debating.    If we use the word in its broad
sense, there is even more debating within the Church, and always
has been, than of story-telling or of preaching as it is generally
understood in other churches. "Mormonism," being new to the
world, has had to fight its way as no other religious organization
has done since the primitive Church, and, fighting its way every-
where, it has developed a strong argumentative tone. Almost
every gospel conversation is sure to grow into a miniature debate,
if it continue long enough.       Indeed, "Mormon" sermons, when
closely examined, reveal more argument than narration or descrip-
tion, or even explanation.     Every Latter-day Saint who uses his
tongue at all in defense of his faith indulges in informal debate.
     Here, then,   lie   opportunities for the practice of the art of
oral speech which are not afforded so numerously to young people
of any other community. No wonder a non-"Mormon" business
man in Utah said before a body of business men not long ago
that he believed he would join the "Mormon" Church to get
practice in public speaking, so as to overcome his embarrassment
every time he spoke in public.       If any young person in the
Church, therefore, wishes to   excel  in the various forms of this
art let him avail himself of every chance that comes his way to
practice it, let him become a teacher, a missionary, a preacher. I
know there are writers on public speaking who advise the study
of principles first.   But this is clearly a mistake. Professor
Dewey tells of some boys who had been taught in an old-fash-
ioned school to go through the motions of swimming on the dry
floor and who replied laconically, when asked what they
                                                          did when
they went into the    water,  "Sink!"   That  is the way   with one
who studies principles over much before he has any practice.
Practice should always come first. It constitutes the very founda-
tion of any art.   We  learn to do by doing. No matter how well
we may know how to play the piano, to paint a picture, to write
an essay, to preach a discourse, we shall never attain even
                                                                 the

beginning  of proficiency in these things if we do not actually play

<!-- page:722 -->

722                   IMPROVEMENT ERA
the piano, use the brush, the pen, and the tongue. The best ad-
vice therefore that can be given to one who wishes to converse
well, to tell a good story entertainingly, to speak in public ef-
fectively is actually to converse, to tell anecdotes and stories, to
speak before an audience, whenever an opportunity presents
itself. Thus he will not only be acquiring ease in the use of the
tongue, but he will make his mind keen to see and utilize what he
needs.
      If practice alone were enough to give the highest proficiency
in  an art, the Latter-day Saints would be the best conversation-
alists, the best story-tellers, the best preachers, and the best de-
baters in the world. But practice is not all that is necessary. One
must study also. For there are effective and ineffective ways of
doing any given thing. Why do you find the conversation of
one person "perfectly charming" and that of another "stupid and
dull ?" Why do you listen like a two years' child to the telling of
a story by one person and turn a deaf ear to that of another?
Why do you strain your attention when this man preaches, and
fall asleep over the preaching of that one, or bring on a nervous
breakdown trying out of courtesy to keep awake? Partly be-
cause of that mysterious something we call personality, for, pri-
marily, Captain Delightful pleases us in chit-chat or story or
sermon or what not for the simple reason that he is Captain De-
lightful   and not Theophrastus Dryasdust.    But it is partly, too,
because he    who pleases us in the employment of these arts ob-
serves,whether he knows it or not, certain principles that     lie at
the bottom of the art of speech.
    For there are in all arts fundamental principles, to observe
which is absolutely necessary if we would become proficient
therein.
     Take farming, for instance. What boots it to love the farm
ever so ardently, to plant yourself on a quarter-section of land
with animals and the necessary utensils, and to plug away till you
wear yourself to the bone trying to wrest a living from the earth,
if you do not know something about the chemistry of the soil,

the behavior of plants, the economy of effort and product, the
availability of the market, and the means and the laws of trans-
portation? I am not saying how you shall obtain this knowledge;
I am merely insisting that you must have it in order to succeed on

the farm today.     Put two men at work in the field, one with,
the other without, such information, and you will quickly see the
difference gradually working itself out in the situation. What is
true of farming is true of any piece of work at which the hand of
man expends effort. Can the carpenter use tools without know-
ing how to use them? Would you trust the watchmaker to take
out your appendix?

<!-- page:723 -->

THE USE OF THE TONGUE                        723

     Now, what is true in these things that we do with the hand
is even more true of the things that we do with the tongue. There
are certain great underlying laws of speech, which one must ob-
serve in order to be effective in this art. Of two persons who
speak in public, for instance, one is effective, other things being
equal, because he observes these laws, and the other is inef-
fective because he does not observe them.       That is the simple
truth.   And again, I do not say how or where the successful
preacher shall find these laws I am but emphasizing just now the
                                  ;

fact that use them he must.     And I do not know that there is a
better way to do a thing than to be aware of how it is to be done.
Of course, some preachers and story-tellers and debaters and
even conversationalists, like some farmers and mechanics, pick up
the main essentials in their experience. That, however, is a long,
a hard, a costly, and generally an ineffective way to acquire them.
A farmer may require ten years to discover by this means what
his son can learn at school in a single day.    And so it may be in
 the arts we   are considering here.   One  may   blunder along the
 way to success through a series of painful embarrassments,
 whereas he might attain a higher goal sooner and with less dis-
 tress and effort by taking advantage of the blunders and successes
of those    who have gone before.
        The third requisite to effectiveness in the spoken word is self-
criticism looking towards improvement.
     To attempt a piece of work one wishes to do, even though
one should fail utterly, always whets the appetite for any bit of
knowledge that may be of aid in a second attempt. It makes the
 eyes keen to see, to segregate, and to apply. Practice in any art
 shows us where we lack, a study of the principles of that art shows
 us how to apply this lack, and the natural desire for efficiency
                                                     in our sub-
 in the art will induce us to apply these principles
 sequent practice. Thus we have the circle completed— practice,
 study, self-criticism, and practice again.
      This is an exquisitely delicate instrument, the tongue.      Why
 should we not put forth every effort in our power to train
                                                                   it   to
                                                           brain?
 do our bidding effectively just as we do the hand and the
      "The tongue is a fire, a world of iniquity," defiling the whole
 body and setting it on fire of hell. How at its mercy we all are,
 whether it is our own or another's, like the dry stubble of
                                                                which
                                                           the all de-
 the prophet speaks, this is licked up by the tongue of
 vouring flame    It plays shuttle-cock and battle-dore with
                   !
                                                                men s
            as witness a  group   of neighbors  passing  a  morsel of
 character,
 local gossip from mouth to mouth.       It jabs, too, like a sharp-

 pointed knife, as in the case of the woman we read
                                                        of the other
 day who  said to her  friend, "Your husband  has  done  so-and-so,'
                                      away  and shot  herself.   Idle
 and he had not, and the wife went
                    says, for  which we shall be  called  to account
 words, all, Tesus

<!-- page:724 -->

724                   IMPROVEMENT ERA
some day.    And so the tongue requires to be bridled, so that it
shall not say what would best be left unsaid.
     But it needs also assiduous discipline, so it shall speak when
and what it should, and speak with such art as it may command.
If, as Jesus declared, we shall be asked to account for every idle
word, it is doubtless true, as the astute Franklin says, that we
shall also be asked to give an account of every idle silence.   For
we may lie by not speaking. The character of our friend, or
even of our enemy, may be unjustly assailed in our presence, and
we may not offer a defense, or come to the rescue of a truth when
we see it deliberately warped and twisted out of all recognition.
The tongue needs to be fortified against this sort of lie, which
we may term the silent lie.
      And then there are the active duties.     It   is   an extremely
delicate task, for instance, this matter of entering the    home of
another and directing the conversation, as a ward-teacher, in a
profitable and interesting channel so that the members, instead
of regarding your presence there as an intrusion upon their pri-
vacy and being bored in consequence, shall sincerely wish you to
come again. Then, too, the ability to tell a story well, or to build
up a discourse, or to put a fact plainly and convincingly is not so
common as one would think, considering that everybody has a
tongue in his head. And so the tongue requires training in con-
versation "to take up what others say in easy comment, to give in
return something which will please, to stimulate the silent and
morose out of their vapors and surprise them into good-humor,
to lead while one seems to follow ;" in story-telling, to select and
arrange the material not merely to hold the interest but likewise
to keep the main line and to make every incident bear on the
point to be brought out; in public address, including the debate,
to pick what is needed out of a chaos of ideas, leaving what is
not required, to organize this material in a clear and coherent
and forceful manner with a view to a central thought, and then
to express our thought, thus centralized, so that the amber of
truth shall be manifest and, if possible, attractive.
     Than the appropriate and skilful use of the tongue there is
no more beautiful and desirable thing in the world of human
society.
SALT LAKE CITY
