---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - McClellan, C. E.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 17
number: 5
published: 1914-03
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: "C. E. McClellan, \"A Bird's-Eye View of Mexico's Troubles,\" *Improvement Era* 17, no. 5 (March 1914): 440–444."
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1705unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera1705unse
start_page: 440
end_page: 444
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1914-03)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1705unse
  publication_year: 1914
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1914, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# A Bird's-Eye View of Mexico's Troubles

<!-- page:440 -->

A Bird's-Eye View of Mexico's Troubles
BY C. E. MCLELLAN, SENIOR CLASS, B. Y. U.
In the year 1521 a daring Spanish adventurer, Hernando
Cortez, conquered the great Aztec empire of central Mexico.
The inhabitants of this newly
discovered American empire
numbered, then as now, about
thirteen millions of peoples,
made up of many tribes, but
for the most part rendering
unwilling tribute to the powerful and blood-thirsty Aztec
rulers, who exacted heavy toll,
not only of treasure, but also
of life in the way of warriors
for conquest and victims for
the sacrificial stone, the latter
amounting, it is said, to as
many as eighty thousand persons in a single year.
Through the instrumentality of Cortez and his followers, this galling Aztec yoke was
lifted from the necks of the
suffering natives who, however, gained little or nothing
thereby, for quickly and firmly
was fastened upon them the burden of Spanish greed and oppression, than which nothing could be worse. Then followed for the
natives of Mexico three hundred years of monotonous servitude,
during which time children were born, grew to maturity, and
died of premature old age, without so much as ever dreaming
that "all men are born free and equal." Their lives were spent
under exacting and brutal task-masters, with toil, poverty, sickness, and abuse, their only portions, till hope of anything- 'better
died within their breasts. And not only hope for themselves,
but hope for their offspring, for a stern fate had decreed that
HERNANDO CORTEZ, CONOUEROR
OF .MEXICO
"He left a character eminent for bravery
and ability, but infamous for perfidy and
cruelty."
*Paper read before the Associated Collegians of the Brigham
Young University, Maeser Memorial Building, Dec. 9, 1913.

<!-- page:441 -->

A BIRD'S-EYE VIEW OF MEXICO'S TROUBLES 441
little or no improvement should come to Montezuma's descendants
till ten generations had passed away.
This is no idle tale of fiction. This is history, a part of the
history of millions of men, women, and children, living upon this
land, long before dedicated by the prophets of God as a land of
liberty, and today holding aloft the banner of freedom as an example to the world. This is a part of the history of a people at
this moment in the throes of civil strife, from the tumult of
which shall arise a liberty and freedom for the sons of Mexico
which they have enjoyed briefly in the name but never in reality.
But to return to the story. Spaniards and the few natives
who had acquired social standing with them, and hence immunity
from oppression, made slaves, peons, of the millions of poor, and
the fabulous wealth of Mexico's silver mines, obtained by the
sweat and blood of her down-trodden sons, was shipped away to
replenish the coffers of decadent Spain.
But so vital is the germ of human liberty that three hundred
years of grinding, crushing oppression could not kill nor destroy
it, even among these degraded Indians ; and in 1810 this mass of
ignorant, suffering humanity arose in the name of sacred freedom, under the banner of the patriot Hidalgo, and after eleven
years of bitter struggle threw off the hateful Spanish yoke.
But it was only the civil power that was overthrown. That
more subtle, more evasive enemy, the power of the mother church,
operating through the Spanish priests, remained. And this power,
controlling at that time two-thirds of all the wealth of Mexico,
did not relax its grasp, but only gripped its ill-gotten hoard the
firmer, in the hope that by this means the Cross might yet restore
the crown, that in turn it might continue its mighty sway under
favor of civil power. The machinations of church leaders, and
the designs of ambitious political aspirants, operating among a
people ignorant of law and unstable of character, kept the country
in perpetual civil strife for almost half a century longer, during
which time the so-called republic changed rulers on an average
once a year, and each new ruler had his own particular views of
government policy which he sought to impose upon the nation.
Progress in any direction, under the conditions, was not likely
to be rapid. And, besides the long list of national calamities that
had pursued the country, another was added about this time when
unhappy and unfortunate Mexico was drawn into strife with her
powerful neighbors, the people of the United States, with disastrous territorial results to the former.
But the darkest hour is just before the dawn, and a bright
morning star arose in the person of Benito Juarez who, with
superior wisdom, gave to his country a constitution under which
she might hope to'rise to an honored place among the nations of
the -vorld. Both his sagacity and his courage were employed to

<!-- page:442 -->

442 IMPROVEMENT ERA
break the power of the Catholic church which he did by confiscating, through legal process, much of the church's property,
and by making it unlawful for religious parties, or powers, to
take part in any of the affairs of state. Yet even while engaged
in these important labors for his country's welfare, he was compelled to struggle against armed rebellion among his own people, and against ambitious foreigners headed by the would-be-
Emperor, Maximilian. Death claimed the valient Juarez while
Porfirio Diaz was still in arms against him, and thus Mexico's
man of destiny was placed upon the throne. I say throne, for
while the country is nominally a republic, few monarchs of modern
times have ruled with the despotic hand with which Don Porfirio
guided the state.
So weary were the people with long years of warfare and
turmoil that for the most part they were glad to find a man who
could control them, even though he controlled with an iron hand.
Notwithstanding his severity, which was perhaps necessary at
first, Diaz governed with a statesman's skill in the main, and gave
to his country a quarter of a century of comparative peace and
prosperity, at least such a measure as she had never known before.
For the admiration we have for this grand old man of Mexico,
we wish it were not necessary for us to make any indictments
against his administration, but justice to our theme compels us.
We have said that the ignorance and the lawlessness of the
people when Diaz began to rule demanded a one-man power.
Diaz was the man, and he understood the situation. But for some
reason he seemed not to note the progress made by his people in
the thirty years of his administration, and he failed to make provisions for this growth. Had he looked more to the education
of his people, especially in the direction of civics, had he granted
them, by little, powers of government, and trained them to govern
and to be governed, there would have been, in my opinion, no
revolution in Mexico today, and Don Porfirio Diaz would have
died at home, the idol of his countrymen and the admiration of
good men everywhere. But he neglected this sacred duty, and
today he i - an exile, while his country is being torn with bloody
civil strife.
Greed for gold and lust for power, twin destroyers of nations, found conditions in Mexico exactly suited to their wishes.
The church party, though not daring to maneuver in the open,
was still secretly a powerful force. A portion of the Spanish
element, though not openly avowing their sentiments, were yet
proud of their descent, and felt themselves entitled to prey upon
the masses where possible. Diaz evidently courted the favor of
these influences for his own aggrandizement. Under him was
aristocracy of wealth and blood throuhgout the country, whose
secret but certain purpose was the exploitation of their country

<!-- page:443 -->

A BIRD'S-EYE VIEW OF MEXICO'S TROUBLES 443
and their countrymen, and in this they have been eminently successful. They have controlled the army, the chief factor in
Mexican politics, they have directed legislation, and have intimidated and bribed the courts, and have exercised for years a
tyranny differing in form but quite as absolute and offensive as
that which their ancestors suffered under.
Although a republic in name, Mexico has been an aristocracy
in fact. Elections have been farces, platforms and principles have
been unknown to those who should have been voters. It is no
exaggeration to say that a large proportion of the voting population never so much as knew when election day came round, much
less did they feel they had any voice in the welfare of their country. Men owning millions of acres of land and millions of dollars' worth of other property use this vast wealth to oppress the
poor, and by a system of peonage keep the toilers subservient to
their pleasures to a degree intolerable to the American mind.
At the same time these aristocrats bear no proportionate share
of the burden of taxation. Judges on the bench fearlessly allowed
their names on the pay rolls of rich corporations and individuals
as a guarantee of friendship when litigation should arise in which
the company were involved. And all this and much more under
the Diaz regime, the best Mexico has known.
Why do not the people rectify such abuses? Madero tried
it at the polls, and they cast him into prison. He resorted to
arms and was temporarily successful, but his democratic ideals
were too lofty to suit the old Cientifico spirit, his sincerity in demanding reforms was too genuine, and they butchered him.
Suppose Carranza, or some other man, succeeds in overthrowing Huerta, — the apt tool and beneficiary of the Catholic
church and the Cientifico party — suppose, I say, some other man
succeeds to the presidency of Mexico, as some man will, wnac
then? By what means can any president in Mexico overcome the
influence of the money power that is so potent with legislators
and judges, both national and state?
The long training in these matters that the people have been
subjected to, their peculiar temperament, and the very marked
social class distinctions, make the questions of bribery and graft
extremely difficult problems in that land. And again, how shall the
ruler of these people induce the legislators who have been elected
by the favor of the rich to legislate against that class and compel
them to break up their vast estates and share them with the lower
class on terms that the latter can possibly meet? And how shall
he control this ignorant, impulsive, lower class so that they will
abide the slow process of legislation which will be necessary under
the most favorable turn? These people have grown used to
revolution, and have now felt a little of the power that a 30-30
rifle gives them, so that they will not be patiently disposed.

<!-- page:444 -->

444 IMPROVEMENT ERA
Can Mexico solve these and other troublesome problems that
confront her? In time, perhaps. I hope she can. Can the United
States resist the pressure that is being exerted by material, social,
and moral interests, and patiently bide the working out of the
situation in that land of manana? Perhaps. I hope she can.
But it is not a question of this man or that man in Mexico.
It is a question of principles, of human rights; and you and I,
under the same circumstances, would take up arms. Our fathers
did for even less provocation in the days of Bunker Hill, and we
honor them for it.
Neither is it a question between the Spaniards and the natives,
for while it is true that Creoles, descendants of Spaniards, figure
largely in the aristocratic class, yet there are many mestizos,
mixed blood, and even some native Indians, who are ranged on
this side, as there are also many of Spanish blood who have
stood with the masses. Hidalgo, who first raised the cry for independence and who gave his life for the cause, was a Spaniard ;
Juarez (the law giver of Mexico and champion against the church )
was an Indian ; Madero, who sacrificed his life for his democratic
ideals, was of Spanish descent, and Huerta, who needs no description here, is an Indian.
To meet their trying situation the Mexicans have the following equipment: They have a country rich in natural resources,
but at present carrying a very heavy financial burden ; they have
a strong national pride and a patriotism of the explosive type,
but their national spirit is not yet crystalized ; their constitution
is excellent, being patterned after that of the United States, but
they are not trained to abide by its provisions. The wealth and
land are in the hands of the few, but the democratic spirit has at
last awakened. Their standards of morals are low, but the people
are less vicious naturally than is generally supposed. Physically
they are rather small but strong, and have great powers of endurance. In character they are hospitable, clever, impulsive, indolent, jealous, and vengeful.
That a more democratic government must be established in
Mexico is imperative, but are the Mexicans able to establish such
a government if left to themselves ? Have they the national spirit,
the stability, the wisdom, and the power to overcome the mighty
internal and external forces that are working for their disintegration?
In their own words, I answer, "Solo Dios sabc."
I'ROVO, UTAH
