---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Jorgensen, Enoch
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 16
number: 6
published: 1913-04
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Jorgensen, Enoch, "Customs and Legends of Utah Indians I," *Improvement Era* 16, no. 6 (April 1913): 625–630.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1606unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera1606unse
start_page: 625
end_page: 630
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1913-04)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1606unse
  publication_year: 1913
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1913, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Customs and Legends of Utah Indians I

<!-- page:625 -->

Customs and Legends of Utahilndians
      BY ENOCH JORGENSEN, PRINCIPAL JORDAN HIGH SCHOOI
                                   I-
               Utah's Policy in Dealing with Indians
      Some one has said, "The only good Indians are the dead
ones," and ignorance has so often repeated this falsehood
                                                          that the
uninformed are apt to regard it as a truism. One might with as
much truth say that 'The only true Christians, in the world's
                                   history, are those that have
                                   been burned at the stake ;" but
                                   even John Huss on the funeral
                                   pyre exhibited no more cour-
                                   age than the Amerind who
                                        willingly laid          down his life in
                                        defense of right as he under-
                                        stood it, and the world will
                                        yet acknowledge that "Poor
                                        Lo" was fully as nojla as his
                                        merciless conqueror.                  Dallen-
                                        baugh says         :

                                              "He possessed a high quality
                                        of intellect, and he differed from
                                        his   white antagonist more in ex-
                                        ternal complexion than in any
                                        other particular, except his social
                                        organization. * * * * But the
                                        Amerind     ha'd       the   same emotions.
                                        He loved his home, his family and
  A TYPE OF WESTERN INDIAN              his   people.          As    to   honesty and
                                        dishonesty,     the         balance was not
far from even    On the whole he was not worse than the European who
brought him degradation. * * * * Love of home and defense of
country are ever extolled as of the highest merit in the White race; in
the American native they were, and are still, usually looked upon as
crimes."

    And what Dallenbaugh says of the western Indian in general
may with as much truth be said of the intermountain tribes, even
of the despised Utes and Pai Utes, or Piutes, as they are often
called.
                         Tribes and Peoples

     All tribes of Utah Indians, except those of the extreme southeastern part of the state, are sub-tribes of the great division called

<!-- page:626 -->

626                       IMPROVEMENT ERA

Shoshones but within the present confines of Utah, the Utes and
              ;

Piutes wore the principal tribes. Tooelas, Timpanogas, Uintas,
Sanpitches, Kanoshones, and some other clans, belonged to the
Utahs, or Utes, while
the    tribes  further
south, except those of
the San Juan country,
are   usually  classed
with the Piutes.        The
Navajos of the southeastern     part   of   the
state,          with
           together
the Mokis and other
peoples of the Colorado plateau region,
are   classed   in  the
great division Puebloan, the term in this
case being used not to
designate people with
a similar     language,
but with similar culture and social organization.
      The two general
divisions    in    Utah
were so closely allied
that in any war with
the settlers they would                      lte Indians
unite under one chief,        After Contact with Civilization, as frequently
if need be, and they         seen in the Salt Lake Valley and upper
frequently    intermar-                  Valleys of Utah
ried.  As is the case with most primitive peoples, the local Indians
were clannish, and the children belonged to the mother's clan.
Adoptions were common, and between Utes and Piutes lines were
not so strictly drawn.

                                   Slavery

      Slavery was practiced in early days by all local natives, and
 by Spanish traders who made it a regular business to encourage
 one tribe to capture children and young women from other tribes.
 The Spaniards would take the captives they purchased from the
 Utes to Mexico or southern California, and trade them for horses
 or other chattel, and these together with slaves they could buy
 from southern tribes they would take north and dispose of to the
 Shoshones. Thus one could frequently meet Navajo or Apache
 house-servants among the white settlers, because the purchasers

<!-- page:627 -->

TYPICAL ARAPAHOE CAMP

would frequently tire of the care of these slaves, and either give
them to the Whites or sell them cheap, and a slave's being purchased by a "Mormon" virtually meant his freedom, as the "Mormons" were uncompromisingly opposed to slavery.
     Brigham Young s Policy and How he Stopped Slavery
      It was the policy of Brigham Young, and of the "Mormon"
people in general, to deal fairly with the natives,to teach them
thrift and industry, and to encourage their already well-grounded

<!-- page:628 -->

;             —

(,2S                  IMPROVEMENT ERA

belief in the "Great Spirit," and if possible to substitute the teachings of Christ for the doctrines of their forefathers which, like the
old Mosaic law, embodied "An eye for an eye, and a tooth for a
tooth ;" love for friends, but revenge, merciless revenge, for wrong
done yon.
     It was further agreed by the Utah settlers that "It is cheaper
to feed the Indian than to fight him."     Thus considerable of the
     turned in by the "Mortithes
mon" people to their Church
was used to satisfy the requests for help made by the
Indians. It was no uncommon
thing to see a band of natives
camped in the tithing yards of
our settlements, for days or
even months at a time, and the
bishop was instructed to provide food and fodder, as well
as articles of clothing; and
from the Redman's viewpoint
he was no beggar, for had not
the settlers appropriated his
all— lands, game, etc?    President Young advised the people to build in towns and to
fence their lands, and above
all to be kind to the Indians
and then, if trouble came, their
battles were half fought be-
                                          WESTERN INDIAN
fore they began, for the native
is ever mindful of those who befriend him.   "Many will say, and
with some truthfulness, that Indians visit revenge upon Whites
indiscriminately yet if one treats them so as to get their real
                 ;

friendship, they are not apt to harm him."   Lever.

                      Slave Traffic Must Stop
     But in spite of all efforts of the Utah settlers to stop certain
practices of the natives, slavery persisted, because the Utes, poor
as they  were before, found themselves hemmed in by the settlements, and making a raid on Cheyenne or Shoshone, where it
proved a success, was an easy way of stocking up with horses and
ammunition, for were not the Spanish traders eager to buy slaves?
But Brigham had advised and urged in the strongest way that the
traffic cease.  Wakara, chief of the Utes, (or Walker as he is
commonly called), was angry, and war broke out in 1853. The
immediate cause was that a White man struck an Indian with a
gun at Springville, and a few days later Arropine or Seignerouch,

<!-- page:629 -->

CUSTOMS AND LEGENDS OF UTAH INDIANS                                         629

as he is called by his people, killed Alex. Keele, at Payson, (July
18, 1853), and this was the signal for a general outbreak; but
Joshua Terry, Mosiah Behunin, and other pioneer interpreters say
the real underlying cause zvas the refusal of the "Mormons" to
countenance the slave trade, which Spaniards from the Southwest
had so long encouraged.
     It was a bloody struggle and not all one sided. The settlers
feltthe need of getting together and heeding President Young's
advice.   Young said "The people seem readier to obey Brother
                        :

Walker's invitation to live together than they do to heed my
counsel."  He always gave Wakara great credit "for helping to
build   up Zion."
     When peace was agreed upon, the Spanish trader was gone
for a while, and Wakara sulked in his tent. He made a raid on
some northern tribe, and brought to the settlements a number of
captive children.  Joe Arropine, Wakara's brother, took a number
of these to Manti, and when the settlers refused to buy the slaves,
before a crowd assembled, he grabbed a ten-year-old boy by the
heels and dashed his brains out on a rock, then turning to the
Whites he berated them for the murder, saying it was their fault,
as they refused to buy the slaves. A few years more and slavery
                                           '

was no longer lawful in the United States.      Now President
Young took a firm stand, and gave Spaniard and Indian to understand that "traffic in human souls" must cease he did it largely
                                                               ;

by moral suasion, backed, of course, by the law and the government.
SANDY, UTAH
     ["Joshua Terry's Story," as related to the author in December, 1912,
by that old scout and pioneer, treating of personal experiences with the
Indians, will be the subject of the next chapter, with illustrations of Jim
Bridger and Joshua Terry.]

                                    T.    Tracy Wright,            president   of   the
                               Knoxville branch, Southern States mis-
                               sion, January 18:            "We are holding many
                               well-attended meetings in Knoxville, and
                               our labors        in    the distribution of litera-
                               ture are successful.            The elders are en-
                               thusiastic in their work,         and are trying
                               to    make       1913    a banner year for East
                               Tennessee.            Elders in the photo, from
                               the       top:   T.     Tracy Wright, conference
                               president, Calder's Station; O. W. Lance,
                               Moab; J. G. Hansen, Deweyville, Utah."

<!-- page:630 -->

Conditions in Turkey

                    BY DR. JOSEPH M. TANNER

    The complete breakdown of Turkish resistance has caused no
     surpi ise to many thousands of people who expected the
little

Turks to give a better account of themselves. Turkey has never
before been so demoralized as at the present time.          From the
moment of the revolution that put the young Turks in power that
demoralization began. The state of affairs in the empire were
so confused, through subsequent years, that it was most difficult
to guess even what the results of the changes would be.          The
Turkish government was in fact in a tottering condition. It
needed only the touch of a revolution to make confusion more
confused.
      If any real reformation were accomplished in Turkey, it must
be by a new order of things completely unlike what had theretofore existed.    Confusion had to be worse confused, weaknesses
weakened, troubles become more troublesome, before there was
really political ground for a new start in the government's life.
Rapid interchanging conditions took place. They were far-reaching in their effect upon the empire, and the internal conditions that
existed after the revolution were not easily comprehended by
those on the outside.   Loyalty was undermined. Strong and lasting enmities were engendered, and differences were perhaps never
before so great in matters of policies to be pursued.     The empire
was poor the army was disorganized. Generals were at variance
          ;

with one another, and there seemed little or no likelihood that the
Turks could ever be brought together in a harmonious effort
toward a common good. If distracted Turkey were to be brought
together, and a new and strong administration built up, it must be
by outside pressure that would unite the Turks in a contention
against the common foe.
      In the midst of such discussions, the Italians declared war and
seized Tripoli.    That war was in far off Africa. It created a
little patriotism, but the great mass of Turks were wholly indifferent to its consequences.     The leaders of the country became
more violently discordant. They shouldered the blame upon one
another for their misfortunes with Italy. It was the psychological
moment, therefore, for the Balkan states to strike. The years of
discord in Turkey had demoralized its army its revolutions had
                                               ;

depleted its treasury, and political strife had destroyed in a large
measure the patriotism and loyalty of the people.
