---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Roberts, B. H.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 13
number: 6
published: 1910-04
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Roberts, B. H., "Joseph Smith’s Doctrines Vindicated. II—The Existence of a Plurality of Divine Intelligences," *Improvement Era* 13, no. 6 (April 1910): 481–488.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1306unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera1306unse
start_page: 481
end_page: 488
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1910-04)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1306unse
  publication_year: 1910
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1910, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Joseph Smith’s Doctrines Vindicated. II—The Existence of a Plurality of Divine Intelligences


<!-- page:481 -->

IMPROVEMENT ERA.
Vol. XIII.                         APRIL,       1910.                     No 6.

Joseph Smith's Doctrines Vindicated.
BY   B. H.   ROBERTS.

II.

The Existence of a Plurality of Divine Intelligences-

The trend of teaching by professors in universities of America
is   supporting the ideas expressed by Joseph Smith in relation to
Deity;     not by direct affirmation, of course, but by natural impli-
cation, they sustain his doctrines in relation to              Deity.   Let   me
call your attention to what the               prophet   taught on the subject of
Deity, by quoting one paragraph                 from a discourse delivered by
him in 1844.           I   think this one paragraph presents in one view the
essential things the prophet had to say about God:

What sort of a being was God in the beginning? Open your ears and
hear, all ye ends of the earth               God himself was once as we
are now,    and   is   an exalted man, and sits enthroned in yonder heavens.
That is the great secret. If the veil was rent today, and the great God

who upholds this world in its orbit, and who upholds all worlds and
things by his power, was to make himself visible — I say if we were to
see him today, you would see him like a man in form, like yourself in all
the present image and very form as a man: for Adam was created in the
very fashion, image, and likeness of God, and received instructions from

<!-- page:482 -->

4S2                            IMPROVEMENT ERA.
and walked and talked and conversed with him, as one                      man talks and
communes with another.          •

This doctrine    met with the cry of " Blasphemy!" even more
pronouncedly than the Prophet's doctrine respecting man.                             The
general conception of orthodox Christendom in relation to                            God
was that he was an incorporeal being, that he was without body;
by which they meant that he was not matter; that he was immate-
rial and without form.  They adopted the old pagan idea that God
was without parts, without passions; that he was without quality,
as a matter of fact, if these other descriptions of him were
true.
What is the inevitable outgrowth                    of the doctrines of these
professors     in   our universities, from what was said in part                    I,   of
this treatise?      It is that there is in          man a divine spirit: that man is
"God manifested in the flesh."                      From this, the question very
Do men become immortal? Are there any means
naturally arises:
by which men may become eternal entities — immortal individuals?
If so,   would they be any less incarnations of a divine spirit in their
immortal state than they are now as mortals?                              The answer is
obvious; and if only it be admitted that           man may become immor-
tal,   then the     doctrine        of Joseph Smith respecting God receives
strong support by necessary implication from the aforesaid teachers
of the universities;      for       if   it   be   true,   as we now are assured it is
by     these              "man is God made manifest;" that
teachers, that
"focused in the mind of man are all the dynamic forces of the uni-
verse"    — then truly    it is      that such doctrines cannot be far removed
from the bold announcement of Joseph Smith, that "God himself
was once as we are now, and is an exalted man, and sits enthroned
in yonder heavens. "   To make complete the support of Joseph
Smith's doctrines from the teachings                       of the universities, it only
becomes necessary to say that the individual man persists; that he
becomes as man, body and spirit, immortal. Let these declara-
tions be made:       The spirit in man is divine            — he   is   an incarnation of
God; man will become immortal.                     Say this and then the whole doc-
trine of Joseph Smith, both as to man and as to God, receives per-
fect support        from the trend of university teachings, as repre-
sented by Mr. Bolce's papers here being discussed; and there                             is

<!-- page:483 -->

JOSEPH SMITH'S DOCTRINES VINDICATED.                                        483

no escaping that conclusion. Hold to the first proposition, namely,
that the spirit of man is divine, then the question resolves itself
merely into       Is there such a thing as resurrection from the
this:

dead for man?   The Christ answers, Yes; and proclaims himelf to
be the "resurrection and the life;" and the "first fruits of the resur-
rection."
Paul most eloquently argues for the reality of the resurrec-
tion from the dead; indeed, his whole                  ministry       had this as         its

foundation.           You will rememher how he argues the question in the
15th chapter of First Corinthians; wherein he masses the Chris-
tian     testimony for the resurrection of the Christ; and after mass-
ing it he then declares that             if   Christ   was not raised from the
dead, then the faith of the Saints was vain, and men were still in
their sins, andwere without hope in the world; for it is only
through Christ that men might hope for the resurrection from the
dead.         Not only does the Christ and Paul argue for this great
fact yet to be realized in man's experience, but you will find very
many Christian philosophers who are arguing today for the same
truth. Among these scientists is one who is among the first
scientists of the English speaking people of today, Sir Oliver Lodge,
who,     in    speaking upon the subject of the resurrection,                       in    his

recent work, Science and Immortality, says:

It is clear that Christianity,    both by its doctrines and          its   ceremo-
nies,    rightly emphasizes the material aspect of existence.                 For    it    is

founded upon the idea of incarnation; and              its   belief   in   some sort of
bodily resurrection is based on the idea that every real personal existence
must have a double aspect, not spiritual alone, nor physical alone, but
in some way both. Such an opinion, in a refined form, is common to
many systems of philosophy, and is by no means out of harmony with
science.

That    is   the declaration     of   one of    the     foremost scientists
of our day!          Continuing he says:

Christianity, therefore, reasonably supplements the mere survival of a
discarnate spirit, a homeless wanderer or melancholy ghost, with the warm
and comfortable clothing of something that may legitimately be spoken
of as a "body;'' that is to say, it postulates a supersensually appreciable
vehicle or mode of manifestation, fitted to subserve the needs of terrestrial

<!-- page:484 -->

484                      IMPROVEMENT ERA.

life;anetherialor other entity constituting the persistent "other aspect,"
and fulfiling some of the functions which the atoms of terrestrial matter
are constrained to fulfil now.   And we may assume, as consonant with or
even as part of Christianity, the doctrine of the dignity and sacramental
character of some physical or quasi-material counterpart of every spirit-
ual essence.

In other words,    Sir Oliver evidently believes       in     something
equivalent to    the resurrection of man; that there will be some
sort of quasi-material substance that shall form the future cloth-
ing of man's spirit, suitable to the future states of         its   existence
and experiences.
Now, my friends, the point is this:       If   our professors, as     we
see they do, insist that there      is   incarnate in man a divine spirit,
and we get men through the           veil of death,       and they become
immortal men, possessing immortal tabernacles, what                 have you
here but the     "superman"       of the    professors,    or the    "exalted
man"   of Joseph Smith's doctrine?         And if we postulate for these
immortals, as both Joseph Smith and the professors do, a limitless
opportunity for progress and development, then indeed it               is   not
impossible that    man may approach, somewhat, even to the excel,
lence of his Father and of his elder brother, Jesus Christ.
This brings me to the consideration of another thought                 in

connection with Joseph Smith's doctrine, namely, the doctrine that
there is a plurality of divine intelligences in the universe
— "Lords
many and Gods many," as Paul would say.
It was supposed that Joseph Smith was guilty of great blas-

phemy, when he announced to the world that in the great vision
of God, given to him, he beheld two personages, each resembling
the other, and that they spake to him;         and one said to the other,
calling the prophet by name, "This is my beloved Son; hear him."
Since Joseph represented that there were two divine personages
—Father and Son —separate and        distinct, one from the other, he was

charged with having uttered a great blasphemy. Such a statement
was at variance with the orthodox conception of Deity. It had been
held in the creeds of men   —notwithstanding they professed belief           in

God the Father, and God the Son, and God the Holy Spirit— that
somehow or other the three persons of the Godhead were but one
essence   or substance: were but one entity, and not three sepa-

<!-- page:485 -->

JOSEPH SMITH'S DOCTRINES VINDICATED.                                        485

rate and distinct personages or individuals.               But      if   the doctrine
considered in part           I    of this treatise be true        as to the          spirit

in   man    being divine; and if that spirit goes through the resur-
rection and becomes an immortal personage —still divine      what                 —
is   the result? The result must be that there are a multitude of
divine intelligences; which is only another way of saying with
Paul, and Joseph Smith, that there are "Lords many and Gods
many."       And so the inevitable result of the teachings in our uni-
versities leads to the support of this doctrine that                was announced
to the world by the Prophet Joseph Smith, that there are a multi-
— angels and arch-angels;
tude of divine Intelligences in the heavens
— David's "congregation of
and Gods who meet in solemn councils
the mighty," where God "judgeth among the Gods" — to generate
the wisdom that         is   present through the universe that has been
brought from chaos into cosmos by the wisdom and power of these
divine intelligences.            But as "pertaining to us," there is one God-
head appointed to preside from among these Intelligences                             — the
Father, the Son and the Holy Spirit.             And this Godhead, or grand
presidency,       does preside       over our   world and the            spheres that
are associated with it: with our earth and its heavens.
This doctrine of the existence of a plurality of divine Intelli-
gences has further support by a very eminent professor                       — no      less

a personage than Professor James, late of Harvard university.
Within the year, his lectures before Oxford university, England,
have been published, and this work bears the title A Pluralistic
Universe.         The outcome of Professor James' learned discussion
of all the questions involved in            this subject   is     to the effect that
instead of the universe being, as he satirically speaks of it, when
referring to the monistic view of it
— "a   solid block,"         it is   a plur-
alistic universe.      One of his passages runs as follows:

I propose   to you that we should discuss the question of God, without
entangling ourselves in advance in the monistic assumption.                  Is it    prob-
able that there is a    superhuman consciousness at        all,   in the first place?

When that is settled, the further question whether its form be monistic
or pluralistic is in order (page 295).

This question as to their being a "superhuman consciousness"
the professor decides in the affirmative as at least probable; and

<!-- page:486 -->

—

486                         IMPROVEMENT ERA.

then he announces that the only way to escape from the incon-
sistenciesof other theories "is to be frankly pluralistic and
assume that the superhuman consciousness, however vast it may
be, has itself an external envelopment,           and consequently is finite"
(page 311).
"The line of least resistance, then,         as   it   seems to me," he
adds, "both in theology and philosophy, is to accept, along with the
superhuman consciousness, the notion that it is not all-embracing,
the notion, in other words, that there              is   a God, but that he   is

finite,   either in     power or      in   knowledge, or      in   both at once.
These, I need hardly       tell    you, are the terms in which           common
men have usually carried on their active commerce with God; and
the monistic perfections that make the notion of him so paradox-
ical practically   and morally are the colder addition of remote pro-
fessorial minds, operating in distans            upon conceptual substitutes
for him alone"        (page 311).          Professor James also explains that
present day Monism carefully repudiates complicity with Spinozis-
tic   Monism, "in that, it explains, the many get dissolved in the one
and lost, whereas       in the     improved, idealistic form they get pre-
served in all their manyness as the one's eternal object.                    The
absolute itself is thus represented by absolutists as having a plur-
alistic object.        But if even the absolute has to have a pluralistic
vision,   why   should     we     ourselves hesitate to be pluralists     on our
own sole account?           Why      should we envolve our 'many' with the
'one' that brings so much poison in its train?" (Page 311).
Addressing himself directly to Oxford men on the movement
of late towards        pluralistic conceptions of the universe, professor
James says: "If Oxford men could be ignorant of anything, it
might almost seem that they had remained ignorant of the great
empirical movement towards a pluralistic panpsychic view of the
universe, into which our own generation has been drawn, and
which threatens to short-circuit their methods entirely and become
their religious rival unless they are willing to make themselves its
allies"   (page 313).
The professor      also insists that     by taking the system of the
world pluralistically we banish what he calls our "foreignness"
by which I understand him to mean our apartness from the world
(i. e.,   universe).      "We are indeed internal parts of God, and not

<!-- page:487 -->

JOSEPH SMITH'S DOCTRINES VINDICATED.                                        487

external creations, on any possible reading of the panpsychic sys-
tem.  Yet because God is not the absolute, but is himself a part
when the system is conceived pluralistically, his functions can be
taken as not wholly dissimilar to those of the other smaller parts,
— as similar to our functions, consequently.                     "Having an environ-
ment, being in time, and working out a history just like ourselves,
he escapes from the foreignness from                   all   that      is   human, of the
static, timeless, perfect absolute.                *         *                 No matter
what the content of the universe may be, if you only allow that it is
many everywhere and always, that nothing real escapes from hav-
ing an environment, so far from defeating its rationality, as the
absolutists so unanimously pretend, you leave it in possession of
the maximum amount of rationality practically obtainable by our
minds.    Your relations with it, intellectual, emotional and
active, remain fluent and congruous with your own nature's chief
demands" (pages 318, 319).
We have not time, of course, to enter into all the explanations
and arguments that Professor James enters upon in treating this
subject, but the purpose of          his   whole work            is   to    establish    the
idea    that the unity   one discovers in the laws and forces of our
universe,     grows out of a "free harmony of individual entities;"
that the absolute reality     is   a system of self-active beings forming
a   unity;    and hence, he concludes the world to be                        'a pluralistic

universe."       With this view Professor Howison, of the University
of California, agrees,     if I    understand him aright, in his contribu-
tion to a     volume on the Conception of God.                        And so this doc-
trine of a plurality of divine Intelligences existing in the universe,
as taught by our prophet,          is   receiving confirmation by the works
and the philosophizing of some of the foremost learned men of our
age and country, and, for that matter, of the world.
Perhaps you will be putting to me the question:                    What of all
this?     Why discuss questions of this character?                      What spiritual
or moral force      may one gather from a contemplation                          of     such
themes?       Well, in the first place, to Latter-day Saints, those who
have faith     in the dispensation of the fulness of                   times and in the
Prophet Joseph Smith     — does    it   mean nothing to you to find the inspi-
rations of God in this man confirmed by the conclusions of plodding
philosophers     who   come        trailing   in       seventy-five          years    after

<!-- page:488 -->

—

IMPROVEMENT ERA.

the words of the prophet have gone forth to the world?                           After he
has been denounced as charlatan, as false prophet and deceiver,
for advancing the truths we have been considering                           — does   it   mean
nothing to you to find that the truths which he stood for are per-
meating the philosophies of men and receiving the sanction and
approval of the learned?            It   means much to me; it gives confirma-
tion    to   my faith; and I rejoice in the triumph                      that the truth is
achieving.     Then to all, whether Latter-day Saints or not, it seems
to     me that to have fixed in             the mind, in the consciousness, the
thought of the reality of things             — the reality of God, the reality of
the divine in man, the consciousness that this spirit within us                              is

of a divine nature,            and that it is capable of attaining to some-
thing really good and great— to something really worth while                              — to
goodness, power and glory, to have that thought present to con-
sciousness,     as   we go about the duties of life                — to feel that "for a
wise and glorious purpose God has placed us here on earth, " and
has merely      "withheld the recollection of our former friends and
birth"   — to be conscious of            all this, I   say,   is    to gather strength
for the battle of life.           To feel that we, in the essence of us, are
one with God, and that he envelops us closely about by spiritual
influences that we can call to our assistance                 — to be conscious of
the fact that our life is part of God's life               — to be conscious of this
is to   banish from us the thought of failing                      in   life.   We    gather
spiritual strength,          and force and power to meet the responsibilities
and duties of        life,    by contemplation of these high themes.                      This
is   the practical effect of these doctrines                  — we know that our           life

touches the      life    of God; that our life is one with God's life, and
this    inspires to noble efforts, out of which                may grow the highest
and most glorious results possible to human life.
(the end.)

Energy the Motive Power.
The longer I live the more deeply am I convinced that that which
makes the difference between one man and another— between the weak
and powerful, the great and insignificant — is energy, invincible determi-
nation   —
a purpose once formed, and then death or victory. This quality
will    do anything that        is to   be done in the world; and no two-legged
creature can become a man without it.                  Buxton.
