--- title: Improvement Era description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930. authors: - Penrose, Charles W. collections: - periodicals tags: - magazine - improvement-era periodical: Improvement Era volume: 12 number: 7 published: 1909-05 publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations publisher_place: Salt Lake City language: en type: magazine reference: 'Charles W. Penrose, "The Age and Destiny of the Earth," *Improvement Era* 12, no. 7 (May 1909): 505–508.' source: url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1207unse transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers. identifier: improvementera1207unse start_page: 505 end_page: 508 rights: status: public-domain basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1909-05) source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1207unse publication_year: 1909 note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1909, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright. --- # The Age and Destiny of the Earth Vol. XII. MAY, 1909. No. 7 THE AGE AND DESTINY OF THE EARTHS BY CHARLES W. PENROSE, OF THE QUORUM OF TWELVE APOSTLES, AND PRESIDENT OF THE EUROPEAN MISSIONS. We are requested to touch upon a subject that seems to be much misunderstood by many people, including some of the mem- bers of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, even by persons who might be supposed to have correct information. It has been stated and published that "The earth is almost six thou- sand years old," and on that theory, some inferences are drawn which are untenable if the premise is incorrect. The question is: are we to understand the assertion as literally true? If so, does not that come in direct opposition with the facts that are looked upon as demonstrated, and with scientific discoveries and ration- al teachings? The editor of the Millennial Star does not profess to know the precise age of this earth on which we live, but is prepared to state most emphatically that its age is very far in ad- vance of that which is implied in the assertion that has given rise to these remarks. In times pasta large portion of the religious world, following perhaps the chronology of the scriptures given by Archbishop Usher, * From the Millennial Star Feb. 11, 1909. 50<; IMPROVEMENT ERA. believed that the creation took place in the year KXM before Christ, but this no longer prevails among enlightened people, and has been exploded by researches and developments and scientific obser- vation. Geology, or "the science of the earth," has demon- strated the fallacy of the idea that the earth is such a young planet in this universe. We do not regard geology as sufficiently scientific to determine exactly the period when this globe rolled into organized existence, revolving on its own axis and traveling on its career round the sun, but the data furnished by thor- oughly sincere and truth exploring geologists are sufficiently defin- ite and reliable to prove that this planet existed and moved and had its being long ages before the six-thousand-years period. The doctrine that God created the earth and everything men- tioned in the Book of Genesis concerning it, in six of our days, has been almost entirely set aside in the light of modern discovery. It is generally believed by expounders of the Hebrew scriptures that the "days" spoken of in the first chapter of Genesis were periods extending over great lengths of time, and were not days of twenty-four hours each, as at one time supposed. Modern revelation has made this fact very clear, disclosing the truth that the "days'' mentionpd were God's days, not measured according to man's reckoning taken from the diurnal revolutions of this globe, but according to the motion of a great governing orb, the revolution of which each day is a thousand of our years. These periods were anterior to the bringing forth of man upon the earth, but the suc- cession of events narrated in the first chapter of Genesis was in the order there described. Many scientific writers have advanced cogent arguments in evidence of the correspondence between the Mosaic account and scientific declarations, so far as this order of the creation is concerned. The light thus thrown on the process of creation and the per- iods thereof, throws back the age of the earth at least a period of six thousand years before the time set forth in the chronology, which for a long time was accepted in Christendom. Readers of the Bible should understand that the figures placed at the head of chapters therein are in a large degree speculative and unreliable; some of them, showing the periods from the birth of some of the patriarchs to that of others, are measurably correct, because they THE AGE AND DESTINY OF THE EARTH. 507 are computed from statements given in the sacred record. But those ventured as starting points on which to calculate the age of the earth, are altogether mere matters of conjecture? That which we have referred to as given by modern revelation does not dis- close, or profess to disclose, the actual age of the earth. It only starts from the period alluded to in Genesis 1:3, when "God said, Let there be light; and there was light." How many ages upon ages passed from the time called "in the beginning," to that when God called forth the light out of the midst of the darkness, cannot be gleaned from any revelation or scripture ancient or modern, that is now known to man. The words "In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth" signify the beginning of this globe in its formation out of chaos. There is no beginning to the works of creation, nor will there be any end. Each world is brought forth in its proper time and place, to preserve the equilibrium of the universe and supply a needful addition to continue its order and harmony. And to that orb it is the beginning of its heaven and its organized materiality, but the term "created" does not signify a production out of nothing. "Ex nihil nihil fit," (out of nothing, nothing comes). God has revealed that the word "create" signifies or- ganize; also that "the elements are eternal." The primary atoms, or whatever is the proper term to use in relation to their original essence, may be organized into different forms and those forms may pass away and go back to their original condition, but the substance remains and cannot be dissolved into nothing. When the Prophet Joseph Smith enunciated the great truth just referred to, the whole Christian world around him denounced him, as opposing and denying the scriptures, but as time has passed along, some of the most eminent philologists, as well as the great fraternity of scientists, have endorsed what he set forth by the word of the Lord, not, however, recognizing him in their declara- tions. There are, no doubt, many people, learned and unlearned, who cling to the notion that God made the universe and all things therein out of nothing, and that the earth and all things material will at some time perish and pass away and be no more. But they are not to be classed with the truly enlightened and advanced students either of science or theology. r>OX IMPROVEMENT ERA. Neither the periods nor the processes of the development of the earth from the nucleus or starting point of its organized devel- opment are revealed in the sacred writings, but there may have been eons of ages between the time mentioned as "in the begin- ning" until the time when "God said, Let there be light; and there was light." And it should not be thought that this command of Deity was the actual creation or formation of light, for that is an eternal principle or manifestation of an eternal essence. It was simply the bringing forth of light to penetrate "the darkness which was upon the face of the deep." So, when after several periods in the order of creation ''God said, Let there be lights in the firmament of heaven to divide the day from the night," and further, when it is said, "God made two great lights, the greater light to rule the day and the lesser light to rule the night; he made the stars also," it is not to be understood that they were for the first time brought into being, but that they were disclosed to this globe, and their influence was brought to bear upon it by the clearing away of the dense mists that had surrounded this planet. As there is much misunderstanding- in regard to the origin of the earth, so there is concerning its destiny. It is stated in scrip- ture that "the earth and the works therein shall be burned up." The conclusion is leaped at from that remark that the earth is then to be destroyed and be no more. But those who entertain that notion neglect to read that which follows, i. e., "Nevertheless, we according to his promise Iook for new heavens and a new earth wherein dwelleth righteousness " (II Peter 3: 10-13.) The les- son learned from these verses is that this globe is to be purified by fire and the "elements to melt with fervent heat," but not to be annihilated. As it was once, in "the flood," cleansed by the baptism of water, so it is to be regenerated by the baptism of fire and the Holy Ghost, and made a fit habitation for "righteousness" and the righteous, that God may d-vell among men and stand upon his "footstool" and commune with man as he did before sin en- tered the world, and "death by sin." This globe will thus be restored to its primeval beauty and purity when God looked upon it and saw that everything therein was "very good." (See Rev., chaps. 21 and 22.) The destiny of this globe is to be fitted as a habitation for the