---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Tanner, Joseph M.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 10
number: 5
published: 1907-03
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Tanner, Joseph M., "The History of a Great Contention," *Improvement Era* 10, no. 5 (March 1907): 367–370.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1005unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera1005unse
start_page: 367
end_page: 370
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1907-03)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1005unse
  publication_year: 1907
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1907, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# The History of a Great Contention

<!-- page:367 -->

THE

<!-- page:367 -->

HISTORY OF A GREAT CONTENTION
BY DR. JOSEPH M. TANNER.
Some companies of negro soldiers had been stationed at
Brownsville, southern Texas. A protest was made at the time by
citizens of the town. Negro soldiers do not meet a very hearty
welcome in perhaps any community near which they are stationed.
The Afro-American is permitted to enlist in the army; and the
army officers have had no little trouble in so regulating his service
as to avoid race antagonism. In Brownsville such antagonism was
manifested, and the differences between the people and the sol-
diers became quite serious. The negro soldier naturally feels that
he is in the service of his country, that in some way he is the ser-
vant of the government, and is therefore entitled to some recog-
nition; but race hatred prevents the recognition that the white
man might receive. In August, 1906, while the negroes were in
barracks at Brownsville, a number of them scaled the walls and
made an attack upon the town. Bullets were fired into the homes
of the people, the sheriff was wounded, a man was killed and the
town terrorized by the soldiers. As soon as the shooting ceased,
the soldiers immediately returned to the barracks and were not
identified by their officer. The affair created some excitement
throughout the country, and an army officer was at once detailed
to make an investigation. The soldiers were all mum. They
either did not know who took part in the affair, or would not give
evidence against their comrades. It was a very serious matter
for soldiers whose sworn duty it is to protect life and property
and maintain the peace of the country to be thus engaged in a most
disorderly and murderous riot. From the investigation made, it
looked very much as if there were a conspiracy to conceal the

<!-- page:368 -->

368 IMPHO VEMENT ERA.
names of those who took part in the affair. Whether the con-
spiracy was general is not known, but it was certainly evident that
some of the negro soldiers who did not take part had knowledge
of the affair. It was certainly necessary that some punishment
be meted out, for such conduct was demoralizing to army disci-
pline, and disgraceful to the army of the United States. But the
guilty ones could not be found. What should be done? Upon
recommendation of the army officer, detailed to make the investi-
gation, the President of the United States dismissed all the com-
panies of the barracks at Brownsville, without honor; and by way
of further punishment declared them ineligible to hold any office
of honor or trust or emolument in the military service of the
United States, and he further declared them ineligible for any
civil service within the gift of the federal government.
The order of the president created an uproar among the
colored population of the United States who had a host of sym-
pathizers among the white population, especially of the North. It
was soon perceived that innocent soldiers might have been pun-
ished in equal severity with the guilty ones. There was no trial
by court martial nor was there a trial by the civil courts. The
punishment was upon the summary order of the president for their
dismissal.
Those familiar with the early history of Utah, remember a
similar disgraceful riot by federal troops stationed near Provo.
The soldiers there were not welcomed into the social life of the
people, and were excluded from the dances. They took offense at
such ostracism and raided the town in the middle of the night,
shot into houses, attempted to burn the tabernacle, broke in the
windows and doors of private homes, and treated the people to
a reign of terror for one night. In those days the complaints of the
people and their remonstrances were answered by stationing the
troops in the heart of the town. Even the soldiers who took part
in the riot, and against whom evidence was overwhelming, were
turned loose without punishment. It did not then seem to make
much difference what outrages the federal troops in Utah perpe-
trated against its inhabitants.
The Brownsville incident at once gave rise to an attack upon

<!-- page:369 -->

THE HISTORY OF A GREAT CONTENTION. 369
the authority exercised by the president in dismissing the colored
troops without honor, and inflicting upon them the disabilities of
future civil or military service. Some of the leading journals of
the United States, notably the New York Sun, at once took issue
with the President. When Congress convened, the Brownsville in-
cident at once became the subject of resolutions. Senator Fora-
ker offered one authorizing a senatorial investigation. He took
the ground that the President had exceeded his authority as Com-
mander-in-Chief of the army, and that the soldiers were entitled
to a trial. Mr. Taft, secretary of war, took the side of the Presi-
dent, and in his report, after going over the details of the riot,
argued that the order of dismissal went chiefly to the fitness of
the soldiers to be serviceable any longer in the army of the United
States. Mr. Taft has had long experience on the bench, and is a
jurist of national reputation. The further fact that such men as
Senator Knox were with the President, while some of the best
lawyers of the Senate were opposed to him, clearly indicated that
a great struggle was on among the leading Republicans of the
Senate. Democratic senators, whose race prejudices were well
known, were in sympathy with the President's order of dismissal;
and Senator Blackburn introduced a resolution endorsing the ac-
tion of the President. This threw the Republicans of the Senate
into an alarming excitement. If the Republican members of the
Senate became divided, it was evident that those who favored Mr.
Roosevelt would have to make common cause with the Democrats
on an issue that involved the President as a great factor in the
political future of the Republican party.
Senator Aldrich gave out that he also would offer a resolution
directing an investigation of the race question, the very thing that
Southern Democrats are anxious to avoid, since such an investiga-
tion might lead to such questions as the representation which the
South has upon the basis of its population, which includes the
negroes, in giving the South its fixed number of representatives m
the House; while, as a matter of fact, the negro vote is nullified
throughout the Southern States. Such a resolution as that sug-
gested by Aldrich was merely a menace to the Southern senators,
that they must not interfere in a race question which they had al-
ways deprecated. In the meantime. President Roosevelt, m a

<!-- page:370 -->

370 IMPKOVEMENT ERA.
supplementary report to the Senate, withdrew that portion of his
order dismissing the soldiers which declared them ineligible forever
to any civil office under the government of the United States. The
question of civil status, he perceived, did not come within his pre-
rogative as Commander-in-Chief of the army of the United States.
It was a frank acknowledgment by the President of his error, and
won for him enlarged commendation for what has been regarded
by many as his frank and manly course in public life.
The Brownsville incident evidently had the effect of bringing
to light the differences that have for some time existed between the
President of the United States and a certain group in the Senate.
For the last few years, the President has been active and pro-
nounced in his campaign against certain phases of great corpo-
rations, and in favor of an income and inheritance tax. He has
stepped from the traditional reserve of the White House, in mat-
ters of legislation, into the arena of legislative combats, in both
the House and the Senate. The immense power of his great
patronage, and his exceptional popularity throughout the country,
made his wish very effectual in compelling some senators to fall
into line with his policy. Public opinion came to the aid of ,jthe
President, whose way was evidently made more or less easy by the
fear which senators and representatives had with respect to the
approval of their constituency. The Brownsville incident, and the
large disapproval of the President's order in dismissing the sol-
diers without honor, brought about a reaction among a group of
senators who, no doubt, felt justified in a retaliation against the
President whose pressure they had hoped to throw off. It is said
that the President is in no mood to compromise; and it is felt
that, in the matter of resolutions, he is able to defeat the group of
senators now opposing him by aid of the solid support of the
Democrats. From this support, Tillman must be excepted. The
critics of the President's policy have not been slow in pointing
out his inconsistencies. They call to mind that in May, 1903, his
attention was called to the retention in the army of a man who
had been accused of a murder. On the question of the man's dis-
'missal, Mr. Roosevelt replied: *'In this matter, even if this man
is a murderer, I am helpless, / have absolutely no power to dismiss
anybodyJrom the army in time of peace.'' And yet, within three
