---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Smith, Joseph F.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 10
number: 5
published: 1907-03
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: "Smith, Joseph F., \"Editor's Table—Our Lesson from the New Theology,\" *Improvement Era* 10, no. 5 (March 1907): 388–391."
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1005unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera1005unse
start_page: 388
end_page: 391
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1907-03)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera1005unse
  publication_year: 1907
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1907, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Editor's Table—Our Lesson from the New Theology

<!-- page:388 -->

EDITOR'S TABLE.
OUR LESSON FROM THE "NEW THEOLOGY."
The most influential Congresrational church in England is said
to be the London City Temple. From its pulpit the so-called "New
Theology" is promulgated. This theology, which is making great
headway in England, is described by its promoters as not in i»ny
way new but rather consisting of selections of belief from other
denominations. Its principal spokesman is Reverend R. J. Camp-
bell, who is the successor of Dr. Parker.
It may not be safe to depend upon the explanations made of
the doctrines of this new theology, because generally any expla-
nations not made by the advocates of the religion itself can scarce-
ly be relied upon. But from the utterances of the religious and
secular press of Great Britain, which has found their way into
American prints, and which are said to emanate from the spokes-
man, we learn that the new movement objects "to the formal
statements of belief which have distinguised the theology of the
past,"—which is a very broad expression, and capable of varied
interpretation;—and also that the starting point of the new the-
ology, which is further described as "an attitude and a spirit
rather than a creed, "is *
'belief in the immanence of God and the
essential oneness of God and man." This is a very sharp differ-
entiation from the Unitarian theory which practically creates an
impassable gulf between God and man.
"Our being.is the same as God's, although our consciousness
of it is limited," the new theology declares; also that "there are
many stages in the upward progress of the soul in the unseen
world, before it becomes fully and consciously one with its infinite
source." The word "'God' stands for the infinite reality whence
all things proceed, is the source of all things, but is itself in pro-
cess of fulfillment, as shadowed forth in the evolution of human-

<!-- page:389 -->

EDITOR'S TABLE. 389
ity." "Man is the revelation of God, and the universe a means
to the self-manifestation of God." The new theology further be-
lieves in the immortality of the soul: "we make our destiny in the
next world by our behavior in this, and ultimately every soul will
be perfected;" but it "rejects wholly the common interpretation
of atonement, that another is beaten for our fault," and believes,
"not in a final judgment but a judgment that is ever proceeding."
Altogether it appears to us that the "new theology" is only
one other protest, among the many, against dying sectarianism.
From a cursory glance at its 'teachings, it appears also that, while
there is much that is misty and inconsequent, it contains many doc-
trines, perverted it may be, which are based upon truth.
But the object here of calling attention to this movement,
which now almost completely occupies the thought of the re-
ligious world in England, is to point out the need for the Latter-
day Saints, and especially for our missionaries, to -keep informed
on the trend of modern religious thought, so that they may be able
to approach the people from the viewpoint of their interests.
A person full of such philosophy as the New Theology pro-
mulgates has little interest in the plain, first principles of the
gospel. His mind is upon other things; and in order to engage
him, the teacher who would open to him the door of the true gospel
must first obtain his attention on the lines which most appeal to him.
The Latter-day Saints have the sure anchor of revelation, and
our religion is based on the everlasting truth. In the revelations
of God to the Prophet Joseph, we have the foundation of all truth;
and in order to compare these truths with old religions, or with
new scientific or theological thought, we need only inform and
familiarize ourselves with them. The Latter-day Saints believe that
the light and truth on man's relationship to Deity; the divinity of
Christ'' and the personality of God; man's origin and destiny and
immortality; the fall of Adam; the atonement; the meaning of
eternal punishment; the nature, eternity, necessity, purpose and
value of the forces of good and evil; preexistence and existence
hereafter; the struggle of God and his children against limitation,
or eternal progress; the certainty of eternal life and the way to
best advance to glorious harmony with the Infinite;—we believe
that all these vital questions are more clearly treated in our re-

<!-- page:390 -->

390 IMPROVEMENT ERA.
velations than in any other philosophy ever before advocated, or
in any that can be promulgated by man.
I think that we ourselves fail to grasp the full and vital mean-
ing of these eternal truths, and that we are much less prepared
than we really ought to be, after possessing them for more than
half a century, to present them to the thinking world. But they
have been revealed to us, and it is our plain duty, by study and
contemplation, aided by the Spirit of God, to master them, for
clear, full, and forceful presentation to the world. Then, when
these contending doctrines and new theories come fortih among
the people, we shall be prepared, by adopting modern methods, to
show more clearly the way of eternal life and truth.
This, of course, can only by accomplished, first, by obtaining
a thorough knowledge of the grand, broad, and far-reaching mean-
ing of the revelations to us; and then, secondly, by keeping
abreast of the most advanced modern thought. This course shall
enable us not only to abide by the truth ourselves, so that every
wind of doctrine shall not affect us and drive us to and fro like
ships without anchor, but also to point out the way and demon-
strate the truth to others, which is our special calling and mission.
Our seventies, elders, teachers, and church educational institutions,
may well wake up and work along these lines.
Joseph F. Smith.
A FALSEHOOD REFUTED.
Writing in a local print of the review in the February Era
of the statement of Senator Burrows that ''there has been no case
in which a candidate for high office in Utah has obtained the con-
sent of the Church to run, and has been defeated, and there is no
case in which one did not receive such consent, and has been
elected," the champion defamer of the Latter-day Saints again
falsifies, and attempts to mislead his readers. He says:
Mr. Smith attempts to deceive when he challenges and disputes with Senator
Burrows in this matter. It is a fact that Apostle Heber J. Grant, speaking for
the president of the church and by the authorization of the president of the
church of that time promised the senatorship to Mr. McCune ******
Joseph F. Smith knows all these things to be' true ; he knows that Mr. McCune was
selected by the president of the church, and that Apostle Grant was authorized

<!-- page:391 -->

EDITOR'S TABLE. 391
to conduct, for Mr. McCune, his campaign. Mr. Smith knows that the exposure
of the Grant methods delayed the deciding vote in the Legislature; and that dur-
ing the delay the authorities of the church concluded to change candidates, select-
ing as a substitute for Mr. McCune, who was a Democrat, a prominent church-
man, who was a Republican, and demanding of the Democratic legislature that it
elect this prominent churchman. Mr. Smith knows that many Democrats were
called from the legislature before the authorities of the church, and were compel-
led to yield their personal and partisan views, and that they agreed to vote for a
Republican at the behest of the church. Mr. Smith knows that in the confusion
thus created, and which was increased as shown, by an adroit political move on
the part of leading Democrats in procuring a recess in order to prevent balloting,
the hour of adjournment was reached; and only for that reason the purpose of the
church was defeated.
It is only necessary to state that Joseph F. Smith has no per-
sonal knowledge of any such alleged facts. Joseph F. Smith was
not in the state at that time, as he left on the 7th day of January,
1899, for the Pacific Islands, and did not return until the 6th day
of March, following. He could not be, and was not, therefore,
in possession of such information; but he does know that at the
behest of the Church no man has ever been compelled to yield his
personal or partisan views, or to vote for any party or person.
The presumption is that if the defamer desired to tell the whole
truth, he could name the prominent Republican referred to; and
the presumption is, further, that he might also truthfully say it
was neither the Church that selected him nor its president.
Joseph F. Smith.
THE REMEDY FOR FAILURE.
In the monthly reports which have come to the General
Board from a number of the stakes relating to the work of Mutual
Improvement in the Church, the superintendents have complained
of indifference, a lack of attendance, energy, and interest, on the
part of the young people. This apparent perplexity is not real
;
we believe that the trouble lies in a lack of intelligent and persis-
tent effort on the part of the officers. Without doubt, every de-
tail of our work can be accomplished readily, when proper effort is
made by the stake and ward officers. Determined work is the
price of success, and the remedy for every complaint that has
come to us in these reports. Would you remove indifference?
