---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Parry, Edwin F.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 7
number: 11
published: 1904-09
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Edwin F. Parry, "Some Stumbling Stones. I," *Improvement Era* 7, no. 11 (September 1904): 838–845.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0711unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera0711unse
start_page: 838
end_page: 845
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1904-09)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0711unse
  publication_year: 1904
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1904, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Some Stumbling Stones. I

<!-- page:838 -->

SOME STUMBLING STONES.
               BY EDWIN F. PARRY, SALT LAKE CITY.

      Why does the Lord permit wickedness and suffering among his
creatures'?

     If there is only one way to he saved, why does not the   Lord tell
everyone the way, in plain, unmistakable language?
     If a person lives a good, moral life, what need is there for him to
                                   '

conform to religious ordinances?

     My dear reader, do any such queries as these ever enter your
mind?    They have sprung up in the minds of some, for I have been
asked regarding just such questions; and I believe they frequently
occur to the minds of thoughtful young people. They are important questions, and are worthy of consideration and study; and by
earnest study and inquiry   we can solve some problems that confront us.   Sometimes people, when perplexed by such questions,
yield too readily to the conclusion that they cannot be solved, and
give up the attempt.    It should be remembered that some of the

most valuable truths, like other less precious gems, often have to
be sought diligently before they are discovered; and, unfortunately,
we at times abandon the pursuit of treasures when they are nearly
within our reach.
     Sometimes questions like the ones that appear at the head of
this paper are like stumbling stones in the way of      young people.
When obstacles are in the way of       our footsteps, the best thing to
do is to remove them, that they may not hinder our progress;         so,
too, when our spiritual or moral pathway is beset with obstructions,
the proper thing to do is to dislodge them and set them aside.
     In discussing these several questions, which I shall do, taking
them one at a time, an appeal will be made to the reader's sense

<!-- page:839 -->

I

                    SOME STUMBLING STONES.                                         83^

of reason, rather than to any scriptures or other authorities, and
he may draw his own conclusions from what may be presented. To
begin with, let me suggest this: In our attempt to interpret the
Lord's motives with respect             to his dealings with mankind, let us
keep in mind that he         is    our Father, and that we are his children.
Let us take it for granted that he possesses all power and wisdom, and that he loves            us,   and   is   ever solicitous of our welfare.
For the sake of aiding our limited comprehension, let us regard
him as we would a wise and good earthly parent, who has a family
of children to deal with; and that we might better understand his
purpose, let us try to imagine ourselves in                 a parent's place, and
then consider what we would be led to do under like circumstances.
By doing this, we will be the better able to understand the philosophy of his designs.
      In attempting     to        answer the first question           — Why does the
Lord permit wickedness and suffering among his creatures?                        —
shall begin with a parable which may help us to arrive at the
proper solution of the problem.
      There was once a wise             man who had a large family of             sons
and daughters.   They all lived together in innocence, harmony and
love.  Their father supplied all their simple wants and needs, and
they had nothing to disturb their peace or cause them anxiety or
distress of any kind.        I    say simple wants, because they were children without experience or extended knowledge, hence they knew
but few desires.      Being so well provided               for,   there was nothing
for   them to do but enjoy their parent's bounty.                     The father loved
his children very dearly;          and while he was*vealthy enough to continue to keep them as he had been doing                  — providing them with
everything they immediately required                — he well knew that such a
course would not afford his children an opportunity nor an inclination
to develop themselves that they might become like him                     —possessed
of knowledge, wisdom, skill and experience.                  As lonjr as he looked
after them and provided for them, they would never 'earn to rely
upon themselves; they would never learn to govern th'^mselvesnor
to govern others, when they should attain to tb? f csition their
father occupied; in fact, they never could attain td such a position
as long as the present conditions continued.
      So the wise man said to himself: "While                     I   love my children

<!-- page:840 -->

840                        IMPROVEMENT ERA.

very dearly, and am loth to part with them, for their own welfare
I shall assign them a place in a distant
                                          part of my possessions,

where they will be compelled to shift for themselves. There they
may associate with each other, but they shall not be allowed to
return to the parental home, until I call them.   If they desire ad-

vice or counsel from  me, they   may   receive it by sending their
petitions to me; but I will not       interfere with their transactions

with each other.     know this arrangement when put into effect
                      I

will cause my children much suffering and sorrow. I know they
will quarrel or  contend among themselves. I know they will be
       and seek to take advantage of each other; and in their
selfish,

struggle for existence they will have to labor with their hands.
I well   know of the pain and suffering they will endure, for have I
not passed through similar experience myself? But having acquired the knowledge and wisdom I possess by such a course of
training, I feel that what is to be thus gained is fully worth all the
trials to be endured."
       Reasoning from this standpoint, the wise man did not regard
                                       to his offspring, to deal with
it as an act of cruelty, nor an injustice

them in this manner.        Indeed, he felt that it would be an injustice,
if   not a cruelty, to    deprive   them     of this privilege of    gaining an
experience.     He realized that      in the     acquirement of knowledge
there is a pleasure, even though        it   be procured by bitter experience.
        So the wise   man did according to his resolve.             As his children grew to accountability, he sent them from their comfortable
home to remain away ttntil he recalled them.
     Just as was expected, there was no end of strife and contention in this new sphere to which the children were assigned.  But
some of them learned in time that it was possible to enjoy a de-
 gree of happiness and satisfaction in that state even,                 if   they
would govern themselves according to the rules their father had
given them.   Other intelligence they acquired also, which would
enable them to appreciate, to a far greater extent              than they did
before, the joys and beauties of their former home in their father's
mansion; and those who were obedient to their parent's laws were
 happy in the assurance that when they should be called home they
 would be made welcome there.

<!-- page:841 -->

SOME STUMBLING STONES.                             841

     When they did return, the father, too, rejoiced to know that
they were educated to the degree that they could appreciate more
fully, and more like he himself did, the pleasure of existence, and the

g;lories   of   his   beautiful   habitation; and his joy with theirs was
made complete by this         fact.    At the time of parting, there was
grief on both sides, but          when they were reunited        in a condition

where they could better appreciate each other's association, owing
to their being the more nearly equal in intelligence, the period of
separation was but a recollection of the past.      Its sorrows were

lost sight of in the happiness of the present, and the bright anticipations and hopes of the glorious future.
        But there \yere some of the children who, sad to contemplate,
continued to be rebellious during their sojourn in the temporary
abode to which they had been sent.             Unwilling to make the sacrifice of their own pleasures and comforts, fleeting though           they were,
for the good of their brothers and sisters, they failed to learn the
lesson that their condition and surroundings were intended to impart.    Having their own free will to do as they chose, they elected
to grasp every immediate advantage, and to indulge in every passing pleasure, regardless of the future.           Severe as was the ordeal
through which they passed there, they overlooked the object for
which they were sent to           this new sphere of   action,   and when the
time came for them to return to their father's home, they were
unprepared to enter his presence.             They themselves felt this very
keenly, and were ashamed to            meet    their parent, while in such a
condition.  They could not return and share the blissful state of
their more faithful brothers and sisters, nor could they enjoy the
innocent condition which they did previous to their departure from
their parental abode.   They were not now in that innocent primeval condition; so it was an act of love and mercy on the part of
their father to shut them out of his presence, as he did, and give
them further opportunity           to prepare    themselves for a place of
happiness such as they were capable of appreciating.
        Now, was there anything unmerciful or unjust in the dealing
of this man with his children?  Was it cruel for him to send them
away for a season that they might get an experience that would
enable them to become like their father          —
                                          capable of appreciating
to a greater degree the benefits and happiness of existence?                 Do

<!-- page:842 -->

842                            IMPROVEMENT ERA.

     not   many parents, who are able to bear the expense, send their
     children, whom they love, away to school in distant places, where
     they are separate from dear ones at               home, and where they have
     to endure the pangs of                separation, and often undergo privations

     and disappointments, and where they are compelled to submit to
     rigorous discipline that may be distasteful and even painful to
     them?      This   is   not because the parents take a delight in seeing
'

     their children suffer.        It is   because they want them to be prepared
     for the duties of      life   — that they may be accomplished in every-
    thing that is good and elevating.              It is their extreme love and so-

     licitude for the welfare of their children that prompts the parents
    to do this; and often they make many sacrifices themselves in order
    to give their offspring such advantages              and privileges.
           Sometimes those children who are sent away to school fail to
    accomplish that for which      they are sent.   They neglect their
    opportunities, for which they have to suffer remorse and shame.
    But do they charge their parents with cruelty for sending them
    out and thereby giving them opportunity to thus disgrace them-
    selves?  If they possess the least amount of gratitude, not even

    those who make a failure of their life feel to censure their parents.
    They blame themselves only; and what adds to their suffering is the
    regret they feel because they have disappointed their parents in
    their hopes and expectations.
           Man's agency to act at will, it may be assumed, gives rise to
    the wickedness that exists in the world, and suffering is the result
    of wrong doing.         In order to develop good qualities within him-
    self a man must be in a position to experience good and evil, and
    be free to do either the one or the other.  He cannot choose the
    good and reject the evil, if only one is within his power.                If he is
    permitted only to do good, he has no choice in the matter, and
    there is no virtue in doing good when he cannot do otherwise.
    On the other hand, if he be compelled to do evil, he is not to ba
    held accountable for that evil, because he does not act on his own
    volition.These facts must be apparent to every mind; therefore,
    itmust be admitted there is wisdom as well as justice in giving^
    man freedom of will to act as he may elect.
        The free agency of man involves physical and mental suffer-
    ing.   Man is capable of enduring as             well   as inflicting   pain.   If

<!-- page:843 -->

SOME STUMBLING STONES.                             843

there were no suffering in the world, the object of mortality would
be defeated, for it is through suffering that man is enabled to distinguish between right and wrong.            We all know that bodily pain
is what restrains us when we break the laws of our physical existence; and were it not for this, we would in our ignorance destroy
all   our limbs and     organs before we had opportunity to educate or
develop them.         The experience of mental pain is what serves to
guide us in observing the laws of our moral           life.   When we injure
our fellow-beings,      we endure the sting of conscience.         We can understand, therefore, that suffering plays an important part in our
earthly career.        It is ever reminding us of     our duties to ourselves
and to our fellows.
      It is charged   by some that the Lord's providences are unjust
because the innocent are permitted to suffer through the wrongdoing of the wicked; the weak are oppressed by the strong; and
children suffer as a result of sins committed by their parents.
While this is all true, it     is   impossible to conceive how it could be
otherwise, and man retain his agency to            do good or evil.    If man

is    given the power to do evil, he will of necessity cause suffering
when he exercises that power, otherwise his actions would not be
evil, for an act can only be evil when it causes suffering, either

directly or indirectly.        The Lord, however, has so ordained that
pain of the character mentioned    —    where the innocent suffer by the
acts of the wicked      — not without
                          is               its   good effects.
     Take for illustration the suffering of a child as a result of its
parents' disregard for law.   Does it not impress a lesson for the
good of mankind?         The physical suffering of the child causes its
parents to suffer mentally through sympathy, and thereby they are
impressed with a lesson which their own suffering failed to teach.
To make my meaning clear, let us suppose a case.                   A man has
contracted a habit of drinking intoxicating liquors.             When he first
commenced that practice, nature warned him of the evil by causing him to suffer, but he disregarded            the warning and continued
on     in the injurious practice,    and through doing so his children are
found to be weak, physically and mentally, or perhaps both, and
suffer as a consequence of their parent's wrong-doing.
                                                    The parent
                           reminded and warned more forcibly
realizes this fact, for he is
than ever of his wrong conduct; and not only is he warned, but

<!-- page:844 -->

g44                       IMPROVEMENT ERA.

those acquainted with the circumstances are also warned of the
evil consequences of disregarding the laws of nature.  So it appears that on account of the perverseness of human nature, there
is a necessity for such suffering. If a man will not take warn-

ing from his own bodily suffering, he is forced to suffer mentally
on account of the wrong he has done to others.
      In olden times, withsome nations, the laws inflicted punishment for crime not only upon the offender himself, but upon his
family as well. Men guilty of certain acts were put to death with
their wives and children.  Do you think the creation of such laws
was due to the cruelty of the framers, or through a desire for
revenge? I think not. One object sought, no doubt, was to
restrain crime.   Men sometimes become so reckless that they
will disregard their own lives, and the most severe penalties will

not hold them in check. We have evidence of this in our own day.
But when people are given to understand that when they disregard
the laws, their loved ones      who are innocent will share the penalty
of their evil deeds, there      is   a greater restraint upon them.           Of
course,   I   do not contend that the more desperate characters, who
seemingly have no respect for anyone, would be held back even by
such a provision as the one mentioned, but it would serve as a
restraint upon those inclined to wrong- doing, before they reached
such a degree of abandonment to wickedness.
      It may not be necessary to mention         any more instances of this
character to show that there is virtue in suffering.                Frequently it
happens that a man, perhaps through an                evil inclination, injures

or inflicts pain upon an innocent person, and then, by witnessing
the result of his wrong-doing, is brought to repentance. The wrong
he has perpetrated has taught him a lesson he perhaps could
learn in no other way.       He is benefited "by the experience at the
expense of the one injured.       But if the one who suffers has benefited his     fellow-being by    his   suffering, then    he   is   partially rewarded, at least, by the satisfaction that he is a benefactor to the
erring one.      And so it is, every martyr who has suffered at the
hands of the wicked has helped to make the world better by his
sufferings.
      It might be    asked. Is not the Lord cruel and unjust, at times,
in directly     interposing in the     affairs   of   mankind by summarily

<!-- page:845 -->

—

                    SOME STUMBLING STONES.                            845

destroying communities?         We read in the scriptures of the Lord
taking vengeance upon nations and wiping them from the earth
sparing not even the helpless children.       If fully understood,   such
acts would be regarded as evidences of the Lord's extreme mercy.
Such people as were so visited were so corrupt that to permit
them to exist would only result in continued suffering most intolerable to bear, as a consequence of their own conduct, and to save
them and their offspring from such a dreadful        fate, he, as an act

of divine mercy, swept them from the earth.
     Persons who suffer through accident, through sickness or misfortune, do not endure their afflictions in vain.  Can we not see
some good resulting from their sufferings? Are not such ones endeared to their families and friends by their very condition? And
when such persons bear their troubles patiently, do they not teach
us a beautiful and impressive lesson in       patience and gratitude?
Then, again, consider the love that is       engendered        human
                                                          in the

heart by mutual suffering!      What other agency is so potent in creating fellowship and tender regard one for another?         Why, then,
should anyone wish that it be removed from the world?           It was

through the suffering of the Savior that redemption was brought
to mankind.     Jesus said that    if   he should be lifted up, (on the
cross) he would draw all men unto him;       and is it not reasonable to
believe that the knowledge that he         suffered and died for their
sakes will help to draw all men unto him?
     Let us not look upon the Lord as being cruel or unjust in
permitting suffering to exist in the world, while     it is a means of

teaching us so many valuable lessons.         With all the suffering he
permits to exist, he is merciful, for he has placed a limit to mortal
pain, and   when that limit is reached, the sufferer is relieved.

                          (to   be concluded).
