---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - John A. Widtsoe
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 7
number: 9
published: 1904-07
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'John A. Widtsoe, "Joseph Smith as Scientist. IX," *Improvement Era* 7, no. 9 (July 1904): 699–705.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0709unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera0709unse
start_page: 699
end_page: 705
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1904-07)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0709unse
  publication_year: 1904
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1904, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Joseph Smith as Scientist. IX

<!-- page:699 -->

JOSEPH SMITH AS SCIENTIST.
  BY DR. JOHN A. WIDTSOE, DIRECTOR OF THE AGRICULTURAL
            EXPERIMENT STATION, LOGAN, UTAH.

                       IX.— GEOLOGICAL TIME.
    God speaks in various ways to men.                      The      stars, the clouds,
the mountains, the      grass and the         soil,   are    all,   to him who reads
aright, forms   of divine revelation.                 Many    of the noblest attri-
butes of God may be learned by a study of the laws according to
which Omnipotent Will directs the universe.
     Nowhere    is    this principle      more beautifully illustrated and
confirmed than in the rocks that constitute the crust of the earth,
and on which     is    written in simple plainness the history of the
earth almost from that beginning,             when the Spirit of God moved
upon the face of the waters. For centuries, men saw the rocks,
their forms and their adaptation to each other, without understand-
ing the message written in them.                 Only, as the wonderful nine-
teenth century approached, did the vision open, and the interpreta-
tion of the story of the rocks become apparent.
     How the earth first came into being has not yet been clearly
revealed.   From the first, however, the mighty forces which act
today, have shaped and fashioned              the earth and prepared it for
man's habitation.      Water, entering the tiny cracks of the rocks,
and expanding        as, in   winter,    it   changed to            ice,   crumbled the
mighty mountains; water,         falling as rain from the clouds, washed
the rock fragments        into the low-lying places to                     form soil; the
water in mighty rivers chiseled the earth with irresistible force, as
shown by the Grand Canyon of the Colorado. The internal heat
of the earth,   aided by the translocation of material by water,
produced     large     cracks    in     the   earth's       crust,     through     which
oceans of molten matter flowed and spread themselves over the
land; the   same heat appeared            in volcanoes,        through which were

<!-- page:700 -->

spurted liquid earth, cinders and foul gases; as the earth heat was
 lost, the crust cooled, contracted and great folds appeared, rec-

 ognized as mountains, and as time went on, many of the moun-
 tains were caused to sink and the ocean beds were brought up in
 their stead.        Wonderful and mighty have been the changes on the
 earth's surface since the Lord began its preparation for a race of men.
        In   the beginning,           it   appears that water covered the whole
earth.       In   that    day,   the living creatures of earth dwelt in the
water, and it was the great age of fishes and other aquatic ani-
mals.        Soon the first land lifted itself timidly above the surface
of the ocean, and        formed inviting places for land animals and
plants.  Upon the land came, first, according to the story of the
rocks, a class of animalsknown as amphibians, like frogs, that
could live both in water and on land; and associated with them
were vast forests of low orders of plants, that cleared the atmos-
phere of noxious gases, and made it fit for higher forms of life.
Then followed an age             in    which the predominating animals were
gigantic reptiles, a step higher than the amphibians, but a step
lower than the class of           mammals to which man belongs.               During
the age of these prehistoric monsters, the earth was yet more fully
prepared for higher life. Following the age of reptiles, came the age
of   mammals, which still persists, though, since the coming of man
upon the earth, the geological age has been known as the age of man.
       This rapid sketch of the geological history of the earth does
very poor justice to one of the most complete, wonderful and
beautiful stories brought to the knowledge of man.                       The purpose
of this paper is not, however, to discuss the past ages of the earth.
       It is, of course, readily understood that such mighty changes

as those just described, and the succession of different kinds of
organic      life,   could not have taken place in a few years.                 Vast
periods of time          must     of necessity have       been required for the
initiation, rise,        domination and         final extinction     of each class of
animals.      A year is too small a unit of measurement in geologi-
cal time; a thousand years or, better, a million years, would                   more
nearly answer the requirements.
       It is possible in various ways to arrive at            a conception of the
age of the earth since organic life came upon                  it.      For instance,
:the gorge of the Niagara Falls was begun in comparatively recent

<!-- page:701 -->

JOSEPH SMITH AS SCIENTIST.                               701

days, yet, judging by the rate at which the falls are now receding,
itmust have been at least 31,000 years since the making of the
gorge was first begun, and it may have been nearly 400,000 years.*
Lord Kelvin, on almost purely physical grounds, has estimated that
the earth cannot be more than 100,000,000 years old, but that                 it

may be near that age.f           It   need not be   said,   probably, that   all

such calculations are very uncertain when the actual number of
years are considered; but, all human knowledge, based upon the
present appearance of the earth and the laws that control known
phenomena, agree       in     indicating that the age of the earth is ex-
treme, running in       probability into millions of years, and it
                        all

must have been hundreds of thousands of years since the first life
was placed upon earth.
      When these immense periods of time were first suggested by
students of science, a great shout of opposition arose from the
camp of the theologians.     The Bible story of creation had been
taken literally, that in six days did the Lord create the heavens
and the earth; and it was held to be blasphemy to believe anything
else.   The new revelation, given by God in the message of the
rocks, was received as a man-made theory, that must be crushed
to earth.   It must be confessed that many of the men of science,

exulting in the new light, ridiculed the story told by Moses, and
claimed that it was an evidence that the writings of Moses were
not inspired, but merely man-made fables.
      The war between the Mosaic and the geological record of crea-
tion became very bitter and lasted long, and it led to a merciless
dissection and scrutiny of the first chapter of Genesis, and the evi-
dences upon which rests the geological theory of the age of the
earth. However, when the din of the battle grew faint, and the
smoke cleared away, it was quickly perceived by the unbiased on-
lookers, that the Bible and science had both gained bj the conflict.
Geology had firmly established its claim, that the earth was not

made in six days of twenty-four hours each; and the first chapter
of Genesis had been shown to be a marvelously truthful record of
the great events of creation.

     * Dana's   New Text Book of Geology, t^. 375.
     t Lectures and Addresses, vol. 2, p. 10.

<!-- page:702 -->

Moses, in the   first   chapter of Genesis, enumerates the order
of the events of creation.         First, light    was brought to the earth
and was divided from darkness, ''and the evening and the morning
were the first day." Then the firmament was established in the
midst of the waters, "and the evening and the morning were the
second day." After each group of creative events, the same ex-
pression occurs, "and the evening and the morning were the third
[fourth, fifth, and sixth] days." Those who insisted upon the literal
interpretation of the language of the                  Bible maintained that the
word day, as used       in Genesis 1, referred          to a day of twenty-four
hours, and that all the events of creation were consummated by an
all-powerful God in one hundred and forty- four earthly hours.                   An
examination of the original Hebrew for the use of the word trans-
lated "day" in Genesis, revealed that             it   refers more frequently to
periods of time of indefinite duration.*               When this became clear,
and the record of the rocks became better known, some theolo-
gians suggested, that as we are told that a thousand years are as
one day to God, the day of Genesis 1 refers to periods of a thou-
sand years each.         This did not strengthen the argument.                  The
best     opinion of   today, and    it   is   well-nigh    universal, is   that the
Mosaic record refers to indefinite periods of time corresponding to
the great divisions of historical geology.
        Even as late as the      sixties and seventies of the last century
this question was still         so unsettled as to warrant the publication
of books defending the Mosaic account of creation.t
        In 1830, certain visions given to the             Jewish lawgiver Moses,
were revealed to the Prophet Joseph Smith.                        These visions are
now incorporated with other matter in the Pearl                    of   Great Price,
under the title. The Book of Moses.               In chapter two of this book
is found an    account of the creation, which             is   nearly identical with
the account found in Genesis 1. The slight variations which occur
tend only to make the meaning of the writer clearer. In this
account, the expression "and the evening and the morning were
the first [etc.] day," occurs just as it does in the Mosaic account in

        * Compare The Mosaic Record of Creation, A. McCaul, D. D., p. 213.

        t For instance Aids to Faith, containing McCaul's most able discus-
sion.     The Origin of the World, J. W. Dawson.

<!-- page:703 -->

—
                  JOSEPH SMITH AS SCIENTIST.                                 703

the Bible.    In 1835 certain ancient records found in the catacombs
of Egypt fell into the hands of Joseph Smith, who found                  them to
be some of the writings of Abraham, while he was in Egypt.                  The
translation of these records       is    also found in the Pearl of Great
Price, under the title, The     Book of Abraham.             In the fourth and
fifth chapters of the book is found              an account of the creation ac-
cording to the knowledge of Abraham.                    The two accounts are
essentially the same, but the Abrahamic version               is   so much fuller
and clearer that it illumines the obscurer parts of the Mosaic ac-
count.     We shall concern ourselves here only with the variation
in the use of the word "day."

     In Genesis 1    :   5 we read, "And God called the light Day, and
the darkness he called Night.            And the evening and the morning
were the first day."
     The corresponding period           is   discussed in the Book of      Abra-
ham 4: 5 as follows: ''And the Gods called the light Day, and the
darkness they called Night. And it came to pass that from the
evening until morning they called night; and from the morning
until the evening they called day; and this was thefirst, or the begin-
ning, of that which they called day and night."
     It is to be noted that in Abraham's version names                were given
to the intervals between evening and morning, and                    morning and
evening; but absolutely nothing is said about a first day: the state-
ment is simply made, that this was the beginning of the alternating
periods of light and darkness which they, the Gods, had named night
and day.     According to this version, the first creative period occu-
pied an unknown period of time.
                                   "And God called the firmament
     In Genesis 1: 8 it further says         :

Heaven,   And the evening and the morning were the second day."
     The corresponding passage in the Book of Abraham 4: 8,
reads, "And the Gods called the expanse Heaven.   And it came to
pass that     was from evening until morning that they called night;
             it

and it came to pass that it was from morning until evening that
they called day, and this was the second time that they called night
and day."
     Here it must be noted that nothing is said about a second
day.   It is said that it was the second time that they called day

which leaves the second creative period entirely indefinite so far as
time limits are concerned.

<!-- page:704 -->

In Genesis 1     :   13, it reads,   "and the evening and the morning
were the third day."
      In Abraham 4: 13, the corresponding passage reads, "And it
came to pass that they numbered the days; from the evening until
the morning they called night; and it came to pass, from the
morning until the evening they called day; and it was the third time."
    Here it is explicitly stated that the Gods numbered the days,evi-
dently,they counted the days that had passed during the third creative
period, and it was the third time that the numbering had been done.
Again, the third creative period is left indefinite, as to time limits.
      Gen. 1   :   19, reads,   "And the evening and the morning were
the fourth day."
      Correspondingly, in Abraham 4: 19, is found, "And it came
to pass that it was from evening until morning that it was night;
and it came to pass that it was from morning until evening that it
was day; and it wa,s the fourth time."
     This quotation from Abraham, standing alone, would be some-
what ambiguous, for it might indicate that it was the fourth time
that the periods between evening and morning, and morning and
evening were called night and day. In the light of previous pas-
sages, however, the meaning of the passage becomes clear. Certainly
there is nothing in the verse to confine the fourth creative period
within certain time limits.
      The fifth day in Genesis closes as does the fourth; and the
fifth time in Abraham closes   as does the fourth.   The remarks
made concerning the fourth creative period apply to the fifth.
     Concerning the sixth creative period. Gen. 1: 31, says, "And
God saw everything that he had made, and, behold, it was very
good.   And the evening and the morning were the sixth day."
     Of the same period, Abraham says, "And the Gods said: We
will do everything that we have said, and organize them; and be-

hold, they shall be very obedient.    And it came to pass that it
was from morning until evening that they called night; and it
came to pass that it was from evening until morning that they
called day; and they numbered the sixth time."
     As in the previous periods, the sixth ended by the Gods num-
bering the days of the creative period; the sixth period, like those
preceding, being undeterminate as to time.

<!-- page:705 -->

JOSEPH SMITH AS SCIENTIST.                            705

        Repeated reading and study of the Abrahamic account, as re-
vealed through Joseph Smith,    make it certain beyond doubt that
the intent is to convey the idea that the creative periods included
much time, and that,        at the end of each period, the measure of
night and day, was applied to the period, in order that its length
might be determined. Whether or not the different creative periods
represented days to the mighty beings concerned in the creation, we
do not know, and it matters little to the argument of this article.*
        Now, then, we must remember that Joseph Smith made this
translation long before the theologians of the world had consented
to admit that the Mosaic days meant long periods of time; and long
before geology had established beyond question that immense time
periods had been consumed in the preparation of the earth for man.
        Joseph Smith, the humble, unlearned, despised boy, unfamiliar
with books and the theories of men, stated with clear and simple
certainty, if his   works be read with the eye of candid truth, this
fundamental truth of geological science and the Bible, long before
the learned of the world had agreed upon the same truth.t
        Standing alone, this fact might be called a chance coincidence,
a result of blind fate.      But recalling that it is one of many similar
and even more striking facts, what shall be said? Has ever im-
postor dared what Joseph Smith did? Has ever false prophet
lived    beyond   his    generation, if his    prophecies were examined?
Shall    we of this foremost age accept convincing, logical truth,
though it run counter to our preconceived notions?      Glorious
were the visions of Joseph the Prophet; unspeakable would be our
joy, should they be given to us.

                              (to be continued.)

     * The writer understands the creation, reported in Abraham, 4th
chapter, to    be spiritual in    its   nature; but he also believes that this
spiritual account   is   a perfect picture of the actual material creation.
If chapter    4 of Abraham represents the Gods planning creation, the
measuring of time becomes easily understood.            It then means,   "How
long will it take to accomplish the work?"           All this, however, has   no
bearing upon the present argument.
     t It may be remarked that other geological doctrines were taught
by the Prophet, that science has since confirmed. One of these was dis-
cussed by Dr. J. E. Talmage in the Improvement Era, Vol. 7, p. 481.
