---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Talmage, James Edward
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 7
number: 7
published: 1904-05
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'James E. Talmage, "Prophecy as the Forerunner of Science—An Instance," *Improvement Era* 7, no. 7 (May 1904): 481–487.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0707unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera0707unse
start_page: 481
end_page: 487
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1904-05)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0707unse
  publication_year: 1904
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1904, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Prophecy as the Forerunner of Science—An Instance

<!-- page:481 -->

Vol. VII.                 MAY, 1904.                           No.    7.

PROPHECY AS THE FORERUNNER OF SCIENCE
                       —AN INSTANCE.

           BY JAMES E. TALMAGE, ph.d., f.g.s., f.k.s. (edin.)    •

         PROFESSOR   OF   GEOLOGY,      UNIVERSITY       OF   UTAH.

     This earth was organized or formed out of other planets which were
broken up and remodeled, and made into the one on which we live.     — Joseph
Smith.    (See Compendium, page 287.)

     Since the early part of the eighteenth century, the nebular
theory has been popularly accepted as a basis of explanation of
the origin of the earth and of worlds in general.             In brief, the
hypothesis   named may be thus expressed:       —   It   assumes for the
solar system, and, by analogy, for every other system of sun and
planets, the existence    of a primeval mass of vapor, incandescent
and highly attenuated, at some stage having a nucleus of more
condensed material. About this nucleus, the vaporous particles, by
long processes of condensation, formed concentric rings, each of
which in time gathered its particles together so as to form a globe
or planet, still in a state of intense heat.    In course of cooling, a
crust formed over the interior molten mass, and the cooling pro-

<!-- page:482 -->

cess continued with necessary wrinkling and folding of the crustal
envelope, resulting in the formation of continental land- masses and
ocean basins, and later of mountain ranges and separating valleys.
    It has long been known that the nebular hypothesis is insuffi-

cient to meet the requirements of observed facts relative to the
progressive stages of earth development; but the lack of a more
satisfactory hypothesis in definite and accepted form, has resulted
in the retention   of the theory    named as a tentative, though con-
fessedly incomplete, explanation.
      A new theory has been long assuming shape in the minds of
thinkers and investigators in this    field;   and for the definite state-
ment of this we are largely indebted to Professor Chamberlin of
the University of Chicago.       It is of sufficient   importance to de-
mand and receive respectful attention in geological societies, and
the concurrence and support of many individual workers of emi-
nence.
     To this new theory the name "Planetesimal Hypothesis" has
been given.  It holds, in the words of an able commentator, "that the

disseminated planet-forming matter had lost its heat while yet ex-
isting in the loose form, as rings or zones, or wisps       of the parent
nebula, and that the globular planets were formed by the slow ac-
cretion or infalling of cold, discrete bodies or particles ('planetesi-
mals')."*
      To avoid in these pages all technical and abstruse discussion of
probable causes and observed results, it may suffice to state that
by the later or "planetesimal" hypothesis most of the fundamental
phenomena incident to earth history are explained with a consist-
ency and simplicity unknown under the old or nebular theory.
      Thus, it is easier, by the new theory than by the old, to ac-
count for the origin of the atmosphere; the origin of ocean waters;
the beginning of the sedimentary rocks or stratified deposits; the
observed volcanic phenomena of earth; the source of hydrocar-
bons, such as asphaltum and its allies; the genesis of metalliferous
deposits; the origin of gypsum and salt deposits; the sequence of
geologic climates; the cause of glaciation, and, therefore, of the gla-

      *"Bulletin Geological Society of America," vol. xv, January, 1904.
H. Le Roy Fairchild.

<!-- page:483 -->

PROPHECY AS THE FORERUNNER OF SCIENCE.                       483

cial period or epoch; the forces that resulted in diastrophic changes

whereby continents and oceans, mountain elevations and valley de-
pressions, have been formed.*
        One fundamental difference between the old, or nebular, and
the new, or planetesimal, theory,         is   that according to the latter
the earth and its companion worlds are made up of particles that
have gravitated together, cold, and possibly capable of harboring
the germs of living organisms; whereas, according to the former,
the earth-globe was originally hot, and, in that state, incapable of
supporting life in any form known to us by observation.
     By the new or planetesimal hypothesis, the earth is composed
of particles that havecome together under the force of mutual at-
traction.                                          —
           The question is now suggested: Is it probable or pos-
sible that the particles so       converging have been components of
other worlds?          To assist in this enquiry let us borrow the astron-
omer's magic glass, and direct our gaze into outer space.
        Following the planets in their order of increasing distance
from the sun, we shall find between the orbits of Mars and Jupiter
a gap, which, according to Bode's law of planetary distribution,
ought to be occupied by a planet in orderly revolution.    Instead
of such planet, we find a multitude of small bodies strewn along an
elliptical orbit at the indicated      distance, and revolving around the
central sun.         These are the asteroids or planetoids, of which hun-
dreds have already been recognized and specified by name and posi-
tion.

        Professor Lockyer says, "To account for the origin of the as-
teroids     it   has been suggested that they may be fragments of a
larger      planet    destroyed by contact with some        other celestial
body."f
        Besides such masses as the asteroids, which revolve in a ring,
there are other and yet smaller bodies moving through space,
some in orbital rings immensely larger than even the orbit of Nep-
tune    —
       the outermost of all the members of the solar system. These
are called meteorites, and some of them come so near the earth
as to enter its atmosphere.     The smaller of these, weighing in

        * See Professor Fairchild's paper, before cited,

        t Lockyer
                    — "Elements of Astronomy," page 156.

<!-- page:484 -->

many cases not more than a grain apiece, are the shooting stars
those tiny bodies that plunge into       our atmosphere from          outer
space, leaving a fiery trail as they are dissipated by the heat of
concussion.     The larger pieces may reach the earth's surface be-
fore they are wholly dissipated by the heat of impact and that in-
cident to friction caused by their passage through the atmosphere.
Such bodies falling on the earth are known generically as meteorites,
specifically as aerolites.  While many of them weigh but a few
ounces or pounds apiece, some are of considerable size, as the fol-
lowing data show. The Texas meteorite, preserved in the museum
of Yale University, weighs one thousand          six hundred and thirty-

five pounds; another, the Pallas, now to be seen in the museum of

Vienna, weighed as it fell one thousand six hundred pounds; one
that fell in Mexico, known as the San Gregorio meteorite, weighs
five tons; and a meteorite   found in Chaco-Guatamba, South Amer-
ica, is reported as weighing nearly fifteen tons.*

      Most of the larger meteorites that reach the earth are com-
posed mainly of metallic iron, alloyed with nickel and other metals,
sometimes containing also crystallized carbon          in   the form of mi-
nute diamonds.       Other meteorites, and particularly the smaller
ones, consist of stony material, not metals in a free state; and in
these, organic carbon has been found.      Indeed the claim has been
made that evidences of fossillized organic bodies are not wanting.
Long ago, it was suggested by Lord Kelvin, then Sir William Thomp-
son, that the germs of life were introduced to earth by the advent
of some moss-covered fragment of a shattered world.
     As to meteorites in particular, and in a general way also as to
the asteroids, it has long been believed by astronomers and others
that they are probably fragments of pre-existing planets;            if   this
be a true conception as to these bodies,    it   is   equally applicable to
the planetesimals, small particles abounding in space.
     Croll has written:  "From what has been stated, it would fol-
low that in most cases the stellar masses have formed out of the
destruction of pre-existing masses, like geological formations out
of the destruction of prior formations."!

      * See Dana's "Manual of Mineralogy and Petrography," page 189.

      t "Stellar Evolution," page 105.

<!-- page:485 -->

PROPHECY AS THE FORERUNNER OF SCIENCE.                        485

         Lord Kelvin, one of the greatest among Britain's living scien-
tists,    has said: "I cannot but agree with the common opinion which
regards meteorites as fragments broken from larger masses; and
we cannot be satisfied without trying to imagine what were the
antecedents of these masses."
    Mennier was honored by the Paris Academy of Science in the
award of a medal for a publication in which he maintained that
"so far as our present knowledge can determine, some of the me-
teors once belonged to a globe developed in true geological epochs,
and which has been separated into fragments by agencies with
which we are not acquainted."

         In   this   connection, certain   scriptures based on revelation,
ancient or modern, may well be considered.          The Lord declared to
Moses: "For behold, there are many worlds that have passed away
by the word of my power.     And there are many that now stand,
and innumerable are they unto man; but all things are numbered
unto me, for they are mine and I know them."*             Again:    "And as
one earth shall pass away, and the heavens thereof, even so shall
another come; and there is no end to my works."f
     The statement by Joseph Smith, quoted at the beginning of
                              and applied by some of our people
this article, has been amplified
in a way unwarranted by the prophet's utterance.  This is no un-
usual incident in connection with the announcement of a great
truth bearing ihe stamp of newness.              Thus,   the words of    the
prophet have been construed as meaning that great masses of
material have come together in space to form this planet, and that
the broken and disturbed state of the earth's crust          is   an immedi-
ate result of these masses falling together in a disorderly way.
True, we frequently find the crustal blocks exhibiting            marked un-
conformity one with another; one terrane of practically horizontal
beds may be found abutting against another, the strata of which
are inclined at a high angle; earth blocks occur tilted and folded

     * "Pearl of Great Price;" Moses 1: 35.

     t "Pearl of Great Price;" Moses 1: 38.

<!-- page:486 -->

bent and broken,— monoclines, anticlines, and great faults suc-
ceeding each other within limited areas.
        Our own State affords striking and altogether admirable illus-
trations of these disturbances, in both the eastern or plateau sec-
tion, and in the western, or basin region.      Every mountain range
is an   example of crustal disturbance, and furthermore, great faults
occur in regions that are comparatively level, the escarpment, or
bluff due to the vertical displacement which characterizes the fault,
having been partly or wholly removed by erosion.
     But the assumption that this broken condition of the crust-
blocks results from such blocks having been tumbled and piled to-
gether in the process of world-making, lying now as they originally
fell, is   completely disproved by existing facts.    No crustal irreg-
ularity or break has yet been observed, the nature          or cause of
which is obscure; indeed, the relation of every block to its contig-
uous formations may be demonstrated beyond question. Moreover,
                                                              —
by applying the most reliable test known to the geologist that of
interpreting the records of the past by the phenomena of the pres-
ent   — we may read on the stony pages, with fair assurance of cor-
rectness, the account of the formation of stratified and other de-
posits,     and of their subsequent dislocation and disturbance, in all
their varied modes of occurrence.
    A clear distinction must be made between theory and fact.
The observations last referred to are in no sense representative of
theory, but, on the      contrary, stand as demonstrated facts.     The
planetesimal hypothesis suggests the formation of worlds       — of this
earth, at least   —by the coming together of small but discrete par-
ticles,    world-dust, if you please, but not large masses of structural
character.      However, the theory does not deny that during the
early formative stages of the earth, ponderous masses may have
thus fallen together; but neither theory nor observed facts war-
rant the belief that the present structure of the outer parts of the
earth is in any way due to the structure of the infal ing bodies,
whether particles comparable to dust, or masses of greater size.
    Approximately nine-tenths of the land surface today consists
of stratified or sedimentary rocks.       These are composed of the
debris of earlier formations, which material by erosion, transporta-
tion,   and re-deposition has been laid down as orderly beds at the

<!-- page:487 -->

PROPHECY AS THE FORERUNNER OF SCIENCE.                         487

bottom of ocean, sea, or lake. Even the oldest eruptive and meta-
morphic rocks known to us appear to consist of the material of
yet more ancient rocks, changed and made over in the construction
of the formations as we now observe them.    He would be rash in-
deed, who would attempt to affirm that he had identified any rock
formation as part of the so-called first or primitive crust.          What-
ever may have been the character of the planetesimal bodies, the
existing structure of the earth's crust is the result of causes less
                                                              —
remote than the original accretion of these bodies, causes of a
kind yet operating,   —
                     disintegration, removal, and re-deposition in
the case of these dimentaries, volcanism and metamorphism in the
case of crystalline rocks.

       In the light of past events, it is apparent that this dissatisfac-
tion with the nebular hypothesis, and its provisional renunciation in
favor of a theory that accounts in a better             way   for   observed
phenomena, will be emphasized as another instance of the fallibility
of science and the utter unreliability of theories propounded by
man.     It will not be strange if   the loudest criticism comes from
those who are least acquainted with either of the theories named,
and still less conversant with the facts they were intended to ex-
plain.
     The man of truly scientific spirit regards a theory in its real
character   —
            as a provisional and tentative explanation of phenom-
ena not otherwise easy to comprehend. Theory is but the scaffold-
ing necessary to the work of rightly placing the building-blocks
of truth in the walls of the rising edifice of science.       These build-
ing blocks are demonstrated facts, truths         made plain; and when
they are in place, their proper relation to each other duly estab-
lished, the scaffolding, which is inadequate and unsightly at best, is

torn down.      Theory becomes unnecessary as our knowledge of
facts increases; but without theory and         hypothesis, progress in
scientific work would be     slow indeed.
       No one is more eager than the         true scientist to test his
theories by each new truth discovered, and to discard the hypothe-
sis as soon as it is proved inadequate      or wrong.
       Philosophy is tardy and science is slow in their enunciation o
