---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Smith, Joseph F.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 6
number: 6
published: 1903-04
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Joseph F. Smith, "Editor’s Table: Congress and the “Mormons”," *Improvement Era* 6, no. 6 (April 1903): 469–472.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0606unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera0606unse
start_page: 469
end_page: 472
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1903-04)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0606unse
  publication_year: 1903
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1903, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Editor’s Table: Congress and the “Mormons”

<!-- page:469 -->

EDITOR'S TABLE.
CONGRESS AND THE "MORMONS."
The Fifty-seventh Congress, which has just adjourned, has to
its record many substantial achievements for the public good. It
provided civil government in the Philippines; a permanent Census
Bureau; created a new Department of Commerce and Labor; gave
government irrigation to the arid land in the West; and provided
for the building of the Isthmian canal; and in its trust program
provided for an anti-rebate law, for expediting suits brought under
the Sherman anti-trust law, and for the appointment of two Assist-
ant Attorneys-general. A law establishing a national militia was
enacted, and a general staff was created for the army; the Spanish
war revenue taxes were repealed, a new bankruptcy act was
adopted; the gold standard was extended to the Philippines, where,
also, a system of currency was provided for, while three millions
were given to relieve distress in the islands; the personnel of the
navy was increased, and five new battle-ships were provided for;
the Alaskan treaty was ratified, and a host of other laws were en-
acted not forgetting the record-breaking appropriation acts which
aggregate over a billion, five hundred million dollars.
Many important measures failed, and the President called an
extra session of the Senate to ratify the Panama canal and Cuban
reciprocity treaties. The swearing in of new senators at this extra
session, among whom was Utah's new senator, Hon. Reed Smoot, as
well as the discussion of the omnibus statehood bill, brought
prominently before the country the "Mormon" problem, so called.
Notwithstanding the many important measures considered,
and the many' others that failed of consideration, the senators
found time to spend days in discussing the alleged danger there is

<!-- page:470 -->

470 IMPROVEMENT ERA.
to this country in the spread and growth of the Latter-day Saints.
Almost every feature of our belief and spiritual and temporal prac-
tice was handled for and against. Pages of the Record are full of
discussion and long quotations from the revelations and from our
history, may be found, including the articles of faith, as well as
many stories true ard false concerning us. Undoubtedly the under-
lying motive in much if not all of this talk was political. It was de-
sired that the statehood bill should be killed; and it was evidently
considered that no question could so divert the people, and at the
same time serve as a splendid time-killer, and excuse for delay, as
discussing the "Mormons." One pleasant feature, however, show-
ing that a more favorable view of us is being taken by the intelli-
gent leaders of the nation, was the tendency to view the evil and
exaggerated charges of church domination and polygamy with a
spirit of mock-earnestness. This was evident even in the language
of our most unreasonable opponents. Another point was the
favorable words from senators who appeared to be the most earn-
est in advocacy of the statehood measure, and who transmitted
that earnestness to their remarks about the Saints. Senators
Stewart of Nevada, Teller of Colorado, Warren and Clark of Wyom-
ing, and Dubois of Idaho, were especially and in all truth, compli-
mentary.    A few truths from the first named must suffice here:
Here is the "Mormon" church. Its founders constituted a devoted band. 1
have been familiar with them for more than fifty years. I have visited repeated-
ly in their homes. I have traveled through their territory. Whatever may be
said of them, they live more closely to their own creed and their own ideas of
morality, and maintain them with more rigidity than almost any other people I
ever saw. As they understand morality, they have always been moral. * * * *
They have their own religious sentiments. They have their own creed which
they observe and believe in as fervently as do the adherents of any other church.
They attend divine services regularly. They have their Sunday Schools. They
have their means of disseminating religious information, and they have dropped
the one thing Ihat the American people condemned as immoral.
Now, there is another thing about the people of Utah. I do not want to sit
down until 1 have borne my testimony to the great good that they have done to
this country. Those people went to Utah on account of their religion. They
went to a country where irrigation was not known. The Anglo-Saxon had never
prosecuted agriculture by irrigation. It never had been done. We came from
a country where we relied only on rainfall. The "Mormons" went to that great
desert region and they suffered hardships which can scarcely be described until
they worked out the experiment of raising crops by means of irrigation.
I was at an irrigation convention at Salt Lake City some ten or twelve years
ago, and President Woodruff and Mr. Cannon stood in the rear of the audience,

<!-- page:471 -->

EDITOR'S TABLE. 471
and without consulting the audience, 1 announced that it was the unanimous de-
sire that they should be heard. I did not put it to a rote because everybody was
against "Mormonism." It was a Gentile convention, composed of a thousand
or fifteen hundred people. I brought those gentlemen right forward, and the
story those two old men told of the inauguration of irrigation, and the hard-
ships they endured, brought tears to the eyes of more than half the audience,
and when they were through it was necessary to adjourn, and the audience
asked to shake hands with them. The old gentlemen told me that was the
entering wedge which brought communication between them and the Gentiles.
This friendship and communication has banished polygamy. Those people
by their industry and economy have built a great State in what was denounced
as a desert. It has enabled those people to enjoy the blessings of free govern-
ment and enabled th« people of the United States to enjoy the fruits of a great
industrial people in the heart of the desert. That has shown to the world what
can be done. * « * * Now, why speak of those people as if they had com-
mitted some crime ? If they had not given up polygamy, it would be different.
But in this question of States, why bring them in collaterally and discuss their
conduct ? Outside of polygamy, they compare favorably with the conduct of
the Puritans or any other people who ever landed on these shores. If you go
and see their homes, see their thrift, see their industrj% see their domestic happi-
ness, you will not have it in your heart to raise j-our hand or your voice against
them. ***** The suspension of the practice of polygamy has not killed
the energies of the "Mormon" people any more than witchcraft killed the ener-
gies of New England and prevented i<s growth. The industrious people who
came there built up New England, and they have gone on, and they are now
among the most enlightened people on earth. So it is coming to pass in Utah.
They educate their j'oung men and their young women, and when they come here
they are able to cope with the brightest young men and women in all the United
States. Do not speak ill of them. The}- do not deserve it. It will not do any
good to denounce them in this debate.
And then, these remarks are made concerning the political in-
fluence of the Church which, I am free to confess, is a wild fantasy in
the brains of ministers and political malcontents, who, for lack of
patronage and place, delight in sensation and lies. The Church is
not in politics. The "Mormons" individually are free to vote as they
please, to join any party that they please, and are never disciplined
or brought to answer for any political act or opinion that they
may perform or sustain. That is the position of the Church. Here
is what Senator Teller has to say:
We have had in the state of Colorado for twenty-five years a considerable
population of "Mormons." I do not myself believe that there has ever been any
interference politically by the "Mormon" Church with these communities. 1
think those of them who came from Utah had their political ideas very largely
formed before they  came  to Colorado.        *       *       *       *       *       *       **
In Colorado they divide politically, with a preponderance very largely to-
wards the Republican party, and I understand very well why that is. The
founders of the "Mormon" Church were great believers in the doctrine of pro.

<!-- page:472 -->

472 IMFKOVEMENT ERA.
tection. That was one of their cardinal economic ideas. Their purpose was to
manufacture and produce everything in the community in which they lived that
it was possible to produce or manufacture, and to buy as little from the outside
as possible. And notwithstanding at one time they felt there was very decided
persecutions on the part of the General Government,which was then in the hands
of a Republican administration, very distinguished members of that Church
maintained their allegiance to the Republican party.
1 agree with the Senator from Idaho that the Church is all-powerful, and
whenever the Church does speak through its first presidency I have no doubt
the great body of the Church would respond to the demand made. But that
such a demand is made or ever has been made, so fT aj our people are con-
cerned, I very much doubt. That powe.- v.hich th ^ Church secured to itself in
its early days has been a great agent in colonizing and supporting that section of
the country.
Mr. President, I had an opportunity of knowing the very first founders of
this Church. Some of them came from the immediate neighborhood in the State
of New York where I was born and brought up, and nearly forty years ago I
came in contact with these people in Utah. I think in all the history of this
country there has never been gathered together a more remarkaole class of men
than that which gathered in Utah in the early history of that territory. They
were men of great ability, many of them men of fine education, some of them
classical scholars of note. I believe 1 do not exaggerate when I say that at one
time the finest Hebrew scholar on the continent was a member of the "Mormon"
hierarchy. They were Greek scholars; they were historians; and they had that
enthusiasm which alone carried success in an enterprise of that character,   *  * *
Now, as to the power of the Church, that cannot be destroyed by legislation.
It is undoubtedly a misfortune that it should prevail, but to some extent it pre-
vails in every religious organization on the continent. In a political contest I
have seen the power of pretty nearly every great church in the United States
influencing the voter, undoubtedly with the thought that it was a proper thing
to do; and I do not mean to say that sometimes that interference may not be a
good thing in the interests of the morals of the people.     ******
The "Mormons" are not people who devote themselves much to politics.
They are as industrious, debt-paying, law-abiding a people as there are any-
where on the continent.
In view of all this, and many more truths that have been and
could be told of the Latter-day Saints as good citizens, what shall
be said of ministers and politicians who profess to tremble and fear
because of the influence that such a people might exert in the
councils of the nation ? One is constrained to pronounce them
hypocrites. Are not a people with the religious, moral, intellectual
and industrial endowments such as the Latter-day Saints possess
and exercise, a power for great good in the nation to which they
belong ? Then why should their ablest and strongest men be de-
nied any right to which the best American may aspire ? There is
no legitimate reason why.
