---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Smith, Joseph F.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 5
number: 10
published: 1902-08
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Joseph F. Smith, "Editor’s Table—Sympathy with Criminals—Modern Revelation," *Improvement Era* 5, no. 10 (August 1902): 803–807.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0510unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera0510unse
start_page: 803
end_page: 807
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1902-08)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera0510unse
  publication_year: 1902
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1902, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Editor’s Table—Sympathy with Criminals—Modern Revelation

<!-- page:803 -->

EDITOR^S TABLE.

                       SYMPATHY WITH CRIMINALS.

       There    is   a deplorable tendency            among       the   people of     this
nation to sympathize with murderers, bank defaulters, evil adven-
turers, and a hundred other classes of criminals who are at
large or   who have been arrested or convicted of breaking the
law.     Such'       a tendency is      not       alone manifest in          the   various
states and territories of our nation, it is also apparent                     among the
Latter-day Saints.         This       sympathy for criminals            is   entirely ab-
normal, and has a tendency                   to    lower and destroy      the moral
sentiment of any people                who    indulges in   it.    For a Latter-day
Saint to sympathize either               with crime or with criminals, is a
burning shame, and          it    is    high      time that the teachers of the
community should stem such tendency and inculcate a sentiment
that would make it extremely abhorrent to commit crime in our
state.
       Recent        examples    in    our country show to what extremes
people   willgo in sympathizing with outlaws who should be
condemned by every right-thinking individual. Criminals should
not look for sympathy from any one. It is only some weeks ago
that a   woman eloped with certain murderers setting the whole
nation agog, and many there were who sympathized with her daring
flight rather than with the murdered man and his kin.
       We have had instances recently in Utah in which condemned
criminals have received        undue sympathy from weak women and
foolish men.         Any person who sympathizes with a criminal be-
cause he is a 'good fellow," lays himself liable to the suspicion that
he himself is a criminal; and openly advertises the fact that if
anything should occur to cause him to break the law, that he

<!-- page:804 -->

804                          IMPROVEMENT ERA.

would look for like sympathy from his friends under similar cir-
cumstances.
       Newspapers give        full     room to criminal       affairs,   and occupy
their valuable space to lay bare to the public every indecent detail
of crime, because the public            demands   it,   and the newspaper that
would not do it would be considered behind the times; hence, we
have the discomforting spectacle of having spread before the com-
munity every morning and evening the horrible details of mur-
der, adventure, robbery and other violations
                                         of law.    The result
is   that unthinking people, in addition          to    becoming criminal un-
wittingly in their own thoughts, make heroes out of criminals by
expressing unnatural sympathy for them.
       It     is   highly   proper to      encourage     a    sentiment      among
Latter-day         Saints   and   in   our associations       entirely     contrary
to    this,   that would sympathize        absolutely with        law and order,
honesty and virtue, and every other good                     doctrine    and deed,
and that would condemn unsparingly every man or woman who is
a criminal, or who in any way sympathizes with crime. I wish
the time would come when our people would not crowd to the court
rooms to hear the details of crime, and when it would be consid-
ered low and vulgar to    spend any time in reading of criminal
incidents, and when, in every other way, people would exercise
their influence to condemn, stamp out, and to make exceedingly
unpopular, both crime and its publication.
     Young men may please God by thinking right, by acting right,
by shunning, as they would destruction, not only every crime,
but the spirit to either see or sympathize with the criminal, or to
hear or read the detail of his damnable acts.                It is an old saying,

that we are what we think; then, to be a good Latter-day Saint it
is necessary       to think pure thoughts, to imbibe pure ideas, and to
let the mind dwell continually upon the noble things,               and the good
deeds, and the exalted thoughts of life, discarding all sympathy or
                                                       The man or
interest for crime and criminals, and all thought of evil.
woman who will resort to the court room, who will visit prisoners
with flowers, who will read and constantly discuss every detail of
crime, should be condemned, frowned upon, and their actions should
                                                   When a mur-
be made detestable in the eyes of the pure in heart.
derer is condemned, he should be detested, dropped, and forgot-

<!-- page:805 -->

EDITOR'S TABLE.                             805

ten; and so also should criminals of other classes who sin grievously
against law and the commandments of God.
                                                  Joseph F. Smith.




                      MODERN REVELATION.

     A certain minister of religion in Salt Lake City has recently
announced as a doctrine that there      is   no good reason to believe
that God will    ever again reveal himself to man:       first,   because
such revelations are not needed; second, they are inconsistent with
the universal character of Christianity; third, there is no sufficient
evidence that direct revelation has been given to        man since the
days of the Apostles; and, fourth, such modern revelations are
useless, useless in our courts and in the courts of the church which
believes in them.
     The ministers as an association have discussed the subject,
and tried to prove that modern revelation is untrue, although they
have not come to a unity on how that can be done; but they have
resolved in substance that "so-called revelations which go to prove
that Joseph Smith was a prophet are inept and inconclusive." In
other words, 'we have no reason to believe," says the first one
referred to, in a sermon, "that God has ever communicated his
will to man as he did to Moses, Isaiah, and John."
     We are to understand, then, that God does not, and will not
further make known his will to men; that what he has
                                                           said suffices.

His will to Moses    and Isaiah and   John is abundant for modern
followers of Christ.    The Latter-day Saints take issue with this
doctrine,   and pronounce it illogical, inconsistent, and untrue, and
                                         lives and that he reveals
bear testimony to all the world that God
his will to men who  believe in  him and  who obey his command-
                                                    history of nations.
ments, as much in our day as at any time in the
The canon of scripture is not full. God has never revealed at any
                                                        If we are per-
time that he would cease to speak forever to men.
mitted to believe that he has spoken, we must and do believe
                                                             that

he continues to speak, because he is unchangeable.
     His will to Abraham did not suffice for Moses, neither did his

<!-- page:806 -->

806                        IMPROVEMENT ERA.

will to Moses suffice for Isaiah.           Why?       Because their different
missions required different instructions; and, logically, that is also
true of the prophets and         people    of      today.   A progressive world
will naver discover all truth until         its     inhabitants become familiar
with all the knowledge of the Perfect One.                   How shall men be-
come acquainted with the knowledge of the Father? Only as he
reveals it to them. Now if we are permitted to believe that the
Lord revealed himself to the ancients of whose deeds we read in
the Holy Scriptures, it seems to me that there is no good reason for
believing that it is not necessary that he should reveal himself in
this day to    others who desire to be guided by his spirit and in-
spiration.    Every new truth which grows into living action in the
lives of men, is a revelation       in    itself    from God, and without the
revelation of    additional      truth,   men would not           progress in this
world, but, left to themselves, would retrograde, being cut off from
the light and    life    of   the great fountain of         all   intelligence, the
Father of All.
     What is revelation but the uncovering of new truths, by him
who is the fountain of all truth? To say that there is no need of
new revelation, is equivalent to saying that we have no need of
             —
new truths a ridiculous assertion. As well, too, might we say
that the revelations which Abraham received were sufficient for
the prophets; that the revelations given to Enoch were sufficient
for Noah, whose mission was to build                the ark and preach repent-
ance; or that the words spoken to Moses were sufficient for all
time; or that  what Abraham received would be ample for his
children through  all the ages.     But not so. Notwithstanding
Abraham was favored with great promises, the word of God
was not denied to his son Isaac, nor to his grandson Jacob. Why?
Because these could not have     performed their missions on the
word of the Lord alone to their father and to others. And how
could the Father of the Faithful have accomplished his work on
the instructions received by Noah? Of what personal use were
the revelations of prior patriarchs and prophets to Balaam or to
Paul?   It is true,     they were of use as historical truths or lessons,
but not sufficient for them individually.              So we moderns stand in
need, oh so greatly! of        constant revelation, that we individually
may fill our missions acceptably to             our Father, and that we may

<!-- page:807 -->

EDITOR'S TABLE.                        807

the better work out our own salvation; and also that we may know
the will of God concerning his Church, hispeople.and his purposes in
regard to the nations. These are a few of the thousand needs that
exist for revelation.
       The Salt Lake minister declares, too, that revelations "are
inconsistent with the universal character of Christianity."        If that
be true, then it    is   because Christianity has   itself   become incon-
sistent     by departing from God, and by dividing against itself, so
that so-called Christians can no more be counted as his people or
his church, because       of   their apostasy, denial, and repudiation of
him.       If so-called Christianity were the true church of      God, and
not a host of warring sects, no reasonable        man would     consider it

inconsistent for the head of the church to receive revelation from
God for the guidance of the church; nor would it be inconsistent
for each member of the church to receive revelation for his indi-
viiual benefit concerning things that pertain to him and to his
       and that would provide him with a knowledge that the
affairs,

word of God, given through the head of the church, is true. One
would not conflict with the other. There would be universal
union, inspired by revelations from the Great Head of the Church,
the Fountain of Truth, who once declared, "Unless ye are one, ye
are    not mine."     Such conditions would need no contending
salaried     ministers; oneman would be as useful as another, to
teach,  testify and expound,  since all would be inspired by the same
spirit, and each  would build  the other up. No; revelation, general
and personal, is not inconsistent with true Christianity; rather, it
is much needed to unite true Christians into one
                                                 grand union, with
Christ at the head.
                                                                      that
     To the assertion that "there is no sufficient evidence
                                                 the days of the
direct revelation has been given to man since
                     necessary to state that there is just as good
Apostles," it isonly
                                                      heavenly beings
evidence that Joseph Smith received visits from
as that Abraham, Moses, or Enoch saw God.
                                                   Men have soberly
                                                 visitation  of angels:
declared themselves as eye-witnesses to the
                                 revelations of  Joseph  the  Prophet,
and, besides, the fruits of the
                             Church of Jesus    Christ  of  Latter-day
in the establishment of the
Saints—  the   "marvelous   work   and a wonder"— are evidences
                                         the truth of what he de-
enough   in themselves to demonstrate
