---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Nicholson, John
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 2
number: 11
published: 1899-09
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Nicholson, John, "Origin and Nature of Man, from the Standpoint of Revelation and Reason," *Improvement Era* 2, no. 11 (September 1899): 820–829.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera211unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera211unse
start_page: 820
end_page: 829
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1899-09)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera211unse
  publication_year: 1899
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1899, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# Origin and Nature of Man, from the Standpoint of Revelation and Reason

<!-- page:820 -->

ORIGIN AND NATURE OF MAN, FROM
  THE STANDPOINT OF REVELATION
            AND REASON.
                        BY ELDER JOHN NICHOLSON.

                                  II.

     The attendance at the second meeting arranged between Messrs.
Wondon, Tudor and Tree, for the elucidation and explanation of
the latter's religious views, was as prompt as at the first. Its ob-
ject was at once proceeded with.
                —
     Mr. Tree At our first interview, held for investigation, it
was intimated that further evidence of man's relationship to God
would be presented; also that some of the declarations of modern
revelation concerning the ante-mortal life of man would be ad-
duced.
     Mr. Tudor   — am unable yet to grasp the idea of God as an
                    I

individual Being.  My conception of him that he a universally
                                             is        is

                    something which operates
existent, intelligent                          space —an organ-
                                                  in

izing, regulating force. In fact, when I have attempted to think of
him I have been mentally overwhelmed; yet I cannot divest myself
of the belief that there must be a Supreme Being, who is all-wise
and all-powerful.
     Mr. Tree   — understand your idea of God to be that he
                    I                                            is not

a concentrated intelligence, but simply diffusive, and dwells every-
where, throughout the universe.
     Mr. Tudor   —Yes, because there    is   infinitude in unrestricted
diffusion.

<!-- page:821 -->

ORIGIN AND NATURE OF MAN,                             821

     Mr. Tree   — grant that God
                  I                   is diffusive and   exists and oper-
ates everywhere.      This is a position of revelation.       But I ask you,
Mr. Tudor, if it can be shown that ther^is power in concentrated
or individual, as well as in diffused existence, whether you would
admit that both must be combined in Deity? Surely no idea attribut-
ing an absence in him of any principle of being connected with the
exercise of complete power could be correct?
     I   have already stated that revelation clearly asserts that God
is spiritually diffusive,   and many men of towering intelligence have
been deeply convinced of the truth of this assertion, evidently by
their own personal experience, and have emphatically announced
their convictions.Among these is John Ruskin, a notable char-
acter, and learned                "A spirit actually does exist
                      man, who said:
which teaches the ant its path, the bird her building, and men
whatever noble deeds and lovely arts are possible to them."
    But the point of your inquiry is in reference to the individual
being of God.         The reasoning upon this theme must neces-
sarily be analogical; therefore  we must consider the nature and
qualifications of man, the being who, so far as we have knowledge,
stands next to God in the possession of facilities for power and per-
petual existence.     In scanning him, well might we exclaim, with
Shakespeare:      "What   apiece of work is man; how noble in reason;
how  infinite in faculties, in form and moving how express and ad-
mirable; in action how like an angel; in apprehension how like a
God!"
     Regard his achivements, which have been attained through
the ages, from the beginning, a fact exhibited by the accumulated
evidences of his marvelous intelligence and          skill   existing in the
chief relic-centres of the world.      In our own day of accumulated
development of opportunities of all time to this point, we are, on
every hand, surrounded by products of human intelligence that
would have been considered miraculous by any of the generations
of the past.    This wonderful being has subjugated the elements to
his will   and made them subservient to        his    use.     He has, in a
sense, annihilated time and distance and shown that God had in-
deed given him power upon the earth and over every living crea-
ture upon its face.
     A host of men throughout the ages have towered above the

<!-- page:822 -->

822                       IMPROVEMENT ERA.

 masses of their fellows, and made such astounding progress with-
 in the brief span of a human life, as to almost make it appear that
 they were exceptions to the universal rule of graduation of devel-
 opment.   They have seemed to leap from the comparative crudity
 associated with the earlier stages of mortal life into one of bril-
liant advancement on the      pathway of moral and     intellectual pro-
gress.
      These exceptional characters are indicators which point fav-
orably in support of the theory of man's ante-mortal existence.
It is reasonable to presume that such proofs of capacity are the

results of a former life
                       and progressive experience, reopened by
contact with new and necessary opportunities.
       Man is a personal intelligence, and in that capacity is a for-
cible illustration of the power of the principle of concentration, but
he is likewise, in a sense, diffusive.
                                   He is surrounded by what, for
convenience sake, is sometimes called an individual atmosphere,
through which his presence may be felt, although he may not utter
a word. He may even stand upon one part of the globe and the
potency of his influence be exercised over myriads of people,reaching
the remotest parts of earth, among beings who never beheld him.
The effects of his personality may even be felt for ages subsequent
to his removal by death.
     Hence, through him is exhibited the potency of the principle
of concentrated and diffused existence in combination. Surely such
manifestations   exhibit    his   relationship to Deity, supporting the
fact of the    "fatherhood of God and universal        brotherhood of
man."
       Mr. Tudor—But you will doubtless admit that        men who ex-
hibit such capacities as you speak of are exceptional.

     Mr. Tree—I have already made such an admission, by stating
that such characters tower above the masses of their
                                                     fellow-men.
But your question merely brings up the principle of classification
—degrees of quality and development among one kind of being—
but this theme properly belongs to another part of
                                                   our investigation,
and will appropriately be considered at a later stage
                                                       of it.
     Mr. Wondon— Heretofore I have always imagined
                                                           that what
is called rationalism was opposed
                                   to religion.  Indeed, this idea of
the antagonism between rationalism and
                                             religion is general.

<!-- page:823 -->

ORIGIN AND NATURE OF MAN.                               823

    In Mr. Tree's presentation no such            difference appears.       On
the contrary there is exhibited, thus far, the most striking harmony
between his reasoning and his religious views. And yet his religion
does not appear to be founded upon his reasons.  On the contrary,
his reasoning seems to grow out of his religion.
     It now dawns upon me, for the first time, that the proper way

to discover the reasonableness of real religion is to first find out
what it is, then compare it with other truth, and the harmony is
at once apparent.   As a religionist I have already been taught a
salutary lesson.
     Mr. Tudor     —Although have not heretofore been a
                                  I                                religionist,
I begin to      get a glimmer of light already.        I   can feel the force,
perhaps more than he does himself, of Mr. Wondon's observation
about the necessity of discovering the real nature of religion before
attempting to reason it out of existence.        However, Mr. Tree seems
to be in a fair way to reason         me into religion, by his method of
presenting it.      But this is a digression, and I desire to hear some-
thing   still   further upon the subject of the relationship of man
to God.
     Notwithstanding the exhibit of the powers inherent in man
and their possibilities, already so clearly depicted, the difference
between the capacity of God and that of even the greatest of our
race must be so extensive as to be incalculable; yet you maintain,
as revelation puts it, that man is the off-spring of God.
     Mr. Tree     — ask you to consider the newly born babe
                     I                                                  ;   im-
potent, helpless and dependent, yet he is the child of his father,
who perhaps has, within a brief period from the time of his own
birth, caused the world to ring         with the brilliancy of his attain-
ments and the greatness of his deeds.            If such a rapid transition

can occur under our own observation within the short span of a
human life, when the immortal             spirit is   enclosed in a compact
physical environment called the           human body, what may not be
possible when the clog of mortality is removed? The individual
would then be endowed with a fullness of capacity, with eternal
duration as his tenure, and all the matter and space needed for the
never ending expansion of his activity.          But it is again necessary
to remark that this important theme belongs to another part of our
investigation.       It is,   however, as will yet be shown, capable of be-

<!-- page:824 -->

824*                        IMPROVEMENT ERA.

ing sustained not only by the statements of revelation, but by
exhibiting itsharmony with truth observable in the operations
of nature.
       I grant   the difficulty in comprehending a close relationship be-
tween the creature and the Creator, But many other things are
equally difficult of comprehension and yet are self-evidently true.
For instance, it is impossible for the human mind to grasp eternal
duration.  Time, however, which is a theoretic division of eternity,
comes within the understanding of man.          Because eternity is be-
yond finite comprehension, it will not be held, on that account, that
time has no relation to eternity.
       In this connection man's capacity for expansion ought not to
be lost sight of.      Every intelligent, progressive man      will,   if   he
give close attention to the operations of his own mind, be able to
observe that his progress only diminishes after his body, through
which the activities of the mind are exhibited, has begun to dete-
riorate.   This again suggests the truth that if he were given a per-
fect body   —free from the seeds of decay and death—he could, as
an immortal being, go on developing and enlarging, without ter-
mination, forever.      If such a facility   would produce a result of
such magnitude it would be contrary to every consistent conception
of a just, merciful and all-wise God to hold that he would not ac-
cord it.    To maintain that he could not give it would be an ab-
surdity, as all things that tend to progress        must be within his
comprehension, and in his power to bestow.
       Thus equipped, man could indeed be regarded as the oifspring
of God, on the principle that like begets like, notwithstanding that
the production might be immensely behind the producer, in all of
the elements of greatness, power and expansive capacity.
       Mr. Wondon    — was intimated, during our
                       It                            first interview, that

you, Mr. Tree, would have something to say about           new or recent
revelation, upon the origin and nature of man.       I   anticipate it will
be of such a character as to harmonize with what was anciently
revealed upon this subject, and, as a matter of course, with your
reasoning already given in support of it.
       Mr. Tree.—You are right; therefore, in this presentation             it
will be unnecessary to      repeat the reasoning, as you will doubtless
be able to apply to new revelation that which has already been

<!-- page:825 -->

ORIGIN AND NATURE OF MAN.                        825

^ven in support of the old.        As you have said, whatever sustains
the truth of ancient revelation, on a given subject, must likewise
.uphold that which is modern, providing the old and the new agree.
•If   both are genuine they cannot conflict.
        Before proceeding with any statement of revelation given in
this age, I desire to go a step further on the basis of the word of
God given anciently, on a theme closely related to man's ante-
mortal existence.
        What   is   now referred   to is fore-ordination   and pre-desti-
nation.  The doctrines of fore-ordination and pre-destination have
been shrouded in mystery. When considered from the standpoint
of the ante-mortal existence of man and a complete and perfectly
systematized divine plan of redemption from the effects of the fall,
mysticism disappears "as the morning cloud before the rising sun."
From a Biblical point of view there is no room for doubt in regard
to the statements of revelation as to the doctrines now considered.
Therefore, unless you shall otherwise require, no attempt will be
made to produce numerous and elaborate scriptural references up-
on these points.       A few that are positive and unmistakable ought
to be sufiicient.
        There will be no question with regard to Christ, as an instance,
he having been "fore-ordained before the foundation of the world."*
        The positive enunciation of the word of God to the effect that
Jeremiah was selected to be a "prophet unto the nations" previous
to the formation of his physical body, has already been brought to
your attention-   The Apostle Paul gives the application of the
principle a broader scope when he says: "He" (God) "hath chosen
                                                   *      *    *
us in him before the foundation of the world."
"Having predestinated us unto the adoption of children, by Jesus
Christ to himself. "t      The same authority states that:    "Whom he
did foreknow, he also did predestinate to be conformed to the
image of his Son.         Moreover, whom he did predestinate, them he
also called."*
        The point established by these references, so far as scripture

       * I Peter 1: 20.

       tEph. 1: 4,5.
       * Romans 8: 29, 30.

<!-- page:826 -->

826                           IMPROVEMENT ERA.

is   concerned, is that certain details of procedure were arranged
in the heavens for the carrying out of a divinely formulated  plan
for the salvation of      man and to aid in directing him through his
mortal probationary estate.          The consideration of the nature of
that grandest of all philanthropic and progressive schemes will be
undertaken hereafter, as the examination of the subject proceeds.
     Does Mr. Wondon desire further scriptural proofs of the pre-
ordination and ante-mortal selection of individuals, to operate in
harmony with God, as            divinely subordinate benefactors of      our
race?
       Mr. Wondon.     — am
                          I       satisfied   with what has already been
offered.
       Mr. Tree.   — Then we     will   proceed to the consideration of
another division of this subject        —the free agency of pre-existent
man.     Independence can never be dissociated from intelligence.
Under certain conditions the inseparability of the two is productive
of conflicts.      Revelation furnishes information of the greatest of all
the ruptures between intelligences concerning which any informa-
tion is conveyed to mankind       —the "war      in heaven."   The scriptural
declaration of this tremendous conflict            is   the basis of Milton's
majestic production, "Paradise Lost."            The relation of this awful
event is to the effect that a multitude of the spirits in the pres-
ence of God broke out in rebellion, led by a great and powerful
character.  The result was that Lucifer, the chief conspirator, and
allwho enlisted in his cause, were driven out of heaven, and cast
down to the earth.*
       The rebels are designated by Jude as "The angels which kept
not their first estate."t
       [At this point Mr. Wondon's face lighted up with an expression
of intense eagerness and interest.            He asked, in a tone softened
by a tremor of emotion: "You say the rebels who were driven
from the presence of God are spoken of as the angels who did
not keep their first estate.        Who were the other parties to the
conflict?    What is meant by first estate?]

       * Rev. 12: 7-12.

       t Jude 6.

<!-- page:827 -->

ORIGIN AND NATURE OF MAN.                                  827

    Mr. Tree.— Suppose this to be your own second estate, how
would you numerically designate the one in which you previously
existed?
        Mr. Wondon, (now almost moved to tears.)             — Indeed there was
no need of my asking the question.               I   have followed your explana-
tions closely from the beginning and have been unable to discover
any discrepancy up to              this point.   A delineation so scriptural,
reasonable and symmetrical cannot be the product of mere human
ingenuity.    It must be divinely true.  Am I then indeed a son of
God?      Imbued with this awful yet comforting thought, how can I
ever dare to sin against a parentage so exalted?
    [Mr. Tree was visibly moved by the frank statement of Mr.
Wondon.    Although naturally undemonstrative, Mr. Tudor also
gave evidence of his sympathy with the sentiments of his com-
panions.]
        Mr. Tree.   — am now about to present what
                      I                                        I   claim to be the
statements of modern revelation on the subjects already consid-
ered.    Before doing so, I request you to suspend judgment regard-
ing the question of the divine appointment and mission of the
Prophet Joseph Smith. Let the quality of what has proceeded
from him be the test of his status. What he brought forth will,
in future, run through the whole course of this investigation.
        Mr. Wondon.       — am quite willing
                               I                     to agree to this condition.
It is scripturally consistent, on the            ground that "a tree     is   known
by its fruits."
        Mr.   Tudor.   — agree
                           I         to this extent, without direct reference
to the question of the divinity of Mr. Smith's mission, that what-
ever has come from him that commends itself to                     my judgment as
the truth, I will accept as such.
        Mr. Tree.   —The references to modern revelation               will   not be
elaborate, the object of their presentation being simply to                    show
that they are in harmony with the statements of ancient scripture,
and consequently in unison with the reasons given in support of
its truthfulness. The following came from Jesus Christ through
Joseph Smith:

    "And now verily I say unto you, I was in the beginning with the
Father, and am the firstborn." *     *    *     "Man was also in the

<!-- page:828 -->

828                       IMPROVEMENT ERA.
 beginning with^God.      Intelligence, or the light of truth, was not created
 or made, neither indeed can be. All truth is independent in that sphere in
 which God has placed it, to act for itself, as    all intelligence also,   other-
 wise there is no existence.      Behold, herein is the agency of man."*

         It would be difficult to imagine a closer condensation of great

 truths in a more limited number of words. The quotation embraces
 the pre-mortal existence of Jesus Christ and of the human race,
 and their spiritual relationship to the Eternal Father, thus being
 in perfect    harmony with ancient revelation on the same subject,
and in accord with       all   the reasoning already adduced in favor of
these truths.
                                                         —
     Then come statements that are axiomatic the uncreatable-
ness of intelligence or truth and the independence of both, in the
sphere in which God has placed them, to act for themselves; other-
wise there could be no existence.    If intelligence and truth could
be created, there would have been a beginning to the operation,
which is an impossibility, as the production of everything is subor-
dinate to the existence of intelligence.          Hence truth, intelligence,
duration and matter       —the physical elements—are             eternal,    and
therefore co-existent with each other.
     In relation to the latter, the revelation already quoted says:
"The elements are eternal;" a truth supported by the scientific
fact that they are indestructible.     The self-acting character of
truth, in the sphere in which God has placed it, is
                                                    demonstrated in
the experience of man. When he violates natural law, or truth,
the execution of the penalty of the law is inevitable and
                                                          frequently
instantaneous with the infraction of the law.     It is also evident
that without independence of action in man, as an
                                                   intelligent being,
his progress would be impossible.
       This must be as true in relation to the "unseen
                                                       world" as it
is   to the "visible," for, as stated by Henry
                                               Drummond, the laws
of the one "project downward" into, and
                                        operate throughout, the
other.
       But it is proper now to return to the consideration
                                                           of the
pre-mortal ordination of        men to execute specific divine commis-

         Doc, and Gov. Sec. 92: 21, 29, 30, 31.

<!-- page:829 -->

ORIGIN AND NATURE OF MAN.                         829

sions.   The Book of Mormon, an ancient record translated by
Joseph Smith, says:

     "And this is the manner after which they were ordained:         Being
called and prepared from the foundation of the world, according to the
foreknowledge of God, on account of their exceeding faith and good
works; in the first place being left to choose good or evil; therefore they
have chosen good, and exercising great faith, are called with a holy
calling."*    .„

     Now, gentlemen, I hoped we would be able to conclude, in this
interview, the consideration ofman in his pre-existent condition,
                                                         we meet
but it is necessary to suspend further investigation until
again; when we will probably consider the cause of the war among
the hosts of heaven, and some other events in the divine economy,
which subsequently ensued.

     After coming to an understanding as to the time of the next
meeting, the trio separated, exhibiting each to the others a senti-
ment of unqualified friendliness.
