---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Roberts, B. H.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 2
number: 9
published: 1899-07
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Roberts, B. H., "The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints at the Parliament of Religions," *Improvement Era* 2, no. 9 (July 1899): 673–685.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera29unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera29unse
start_page: 673
end_page: 685
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1899-07)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera29unse
  publication_year: 1899
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1899, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints at the Parliament of Religions

<!-- page:673 -->

THE CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LAT-
  TER-DAY SAINTS AT THE PARLIA-
        MENT OF RELIGIONS.
                          BY B. H. ROBERTS.

                                   II.

                    PRELIMINARY AGITATION.

     At the time the press of the country was discussing pro and
con, during the  summer of 1891, the advantages and disadvantages of the proposed Parliament of Religions, the writer was employed as associate editor of the Salt Lake Herald, and it occurred
to him at that time that the parliament would aiford a splendid
opportunity to the Mormon Church to represent its history, doctrine
and achievements before the world through that parliament, and
likewise deliver its important message to mankind, and accordingly
in the issue of the Salt Lake Herald on July 15th, 1891, the following editorial appeared:

                    ''A   RELIGIOUS CONGRESS.
    "An important matter connected with the World's Columbian Exposition, yet forming no part of it, will be a world's   congress, the special
purpose of which will be to arrange conventions in which the most eminent men of different religious faiths may meet in frank and friendly conference in regard to the great truths and the great problems of the age*
There will be as many special conventions of different churches, denomi-

<!-- page:674 -->

674                        IMPROVEMENT ERA.

 nations, etc., as may be desired, but the great features will be a central
 religious congress on a wider basis     —a representative gathering of men
 united for the attainment of great moral ends.            The subjects to be dis-
 cussed cover the relation of religion to every department of life in every
 portion of the globe.    Already responses have been received from lead-
 ing theologians, statesmen, jurists and scholars in          all departments, and

 the committee, which represents nearly all the different denominations,
 and of which the Rev. John H. Barrows, D. D., is chairman, are anticipat-
 ing that the congress of 1893, will mark an important epoch in the his-
 tory of the human mind.  It is announced in the circular of the commit-

 tee that any persons wishing to arrange for special conventions are
 requested to communicate directly with the chairman.
       "This congress will doubtless be one of the most interesting features,
if not of the great exhibition itself,   then one of the most interesting auxiliary features   —at least to religious people—that         will spring up around
it in Chicago during the    eventful year of 1893.           Mention of this great
religious congress reminds us that    Mormonism         is   an American product,
one of which   all the inhabitants of the earth have heard, and about

which they all have a curiosity if not an interest; and it appears to us that
a good thing for the Mormons to do would be to seek a place in that congress and a hearing in respect to their religion       —
                                                 a theme that could not
fail to command interest.     The Mormon Church has complained, and that
justly, of a misrepresentation of its     faith   —   wilful, persistent misrepresentation made for the purpose of undoing its fair fame with the world,
or, rather, to prevent it from acquiring such fair fame.     But it has
weathered the storms, and in spite of falsehood, of calumny and abuse, it
stands unmoved amid threatening elements, the ark of safety to scores of
thousands in this great inter-mountain region, while tens of thousands in
foreign lands look upon it in the same way, and fondly anticipate the day
when they can connect themselves with the great body of the Church.
The Church, then, should seek to make itself heard in that congress, and
since it has justly complained of misrepresentation            from others, let it
seek in such an important gathering, to represent itself by sending to
that congress its most competent men as delegates.
     "A church with such a remarkable origin as the Mormon Church has,
with so remarkable a history as it has back of it, could not well be denied
a hearing in its own behalf in the religious congress, unless, indeed, a
narrow and most ungenerous prejudice should prevail in the councils of
those having the arrangement and management of the congress a thing     —
most unlikely with men adjudged capable of taking the oversight of such
a gathering. But if a sectarian bigoted prejudice should bar the Mormon

<!-- page:675 -->

—

  THE CHURCH AT THE PARLIAMENT OF RELIGIONS.                               675

Church from a hearing in the congress, there is still the bar of public
opinion in the world  —
                      the center of which will be in Chicago in 1893
before which it may plead its cause, before which it should plead it, and
in such form as it never has done before.
     "If denied admission in the religious congress, or whether it gains
admission or not, it should certainly secure a    fine public hall during the
continuance of the exhibition, erect a pulpit, and fill it with its ablest men,
who, in a course of lectures and by holding religious services could make
the visitors from other nations and the uninformed of our         own nation,
acquainted with the    Mormon    religion.   In connection   with that labor
might be established a bureau of information in relation to Mormonism,
where Mormon literature could be on sale, and where        its representatives

could be found by the inquiring foreigner or native seeking information
on so interesting a subject. In addition to that a periodical could be published during the existence of the great exhibition,      expounding the doctrine of the Church and defending its faith; for of one thing the Mormons
may be assured, and that is, their faith, in some way or other, will be
assailed, and it should be defended. The Mormon Church owes it to itself
to make this effort, it owes it no less to the country.
     "Much bitterness exists in religious circles against Mormonism and
its devotees;yet when people of the world become conversant with the
former and familiar with the latter, their prejudices are softened and
their bitterness vanishes; may not similar results, to some extent, at
least be obtained by affording the people     who visit Chicago in 1893 an
opportunity to acquire some correct information on the subject of the Mormon religion."

     At the priesthood meeting held during the semi-annual Conference of the Church in October following, the writer also invited
the attention of the Church leaders to the importance of being
properly represented at this World's Parliament of Religions. But
very little interest, however, was manifested in the subject. In
the following Conference, held in April, 1892, the subject was
again introduced in the priesthood meeting, and a committee was
appointed to take the matter under advisement, but nothing was
done, and the general feeling prevailed that the matter was unimportant, and therefore no preliminary steps were taken looking to
the representation of the Church, either in the exposition in the
World's Columbian Exhibition proper or in the Parliament of Religions.

<!-- page:676 -->

676                        IMPROVEMENT ERA.

      When, however, the fair was opened in the summer of 1893,
and  Utah  people visited the Exposition and found that nearly every
other  religious denomination had its special booth in one of the
main  exposition  buildings    —                               —
                              the Liberal Arts Building and was setting forth  its educational, missionary   and other achievements to
the millions  who  visited the  fair, letters  began to pour into the
Church headquarters, and to    the Salt Lake  papers, expressing regret
that nothing had been done to represent the Mormon Church and
its achievements.    These letters awakened an interest in the subject which the efforts of the writter had failed to do; and as a
result an effort was made to secure both representation in the main
Exposition and the Parliament of Religions.
      The interest which the writer had manifested in this subject a
year or two before, was perhaps at this point remembered, and he
received an appointment from the First Presidency of the Mormon
Church to represent it in this matter, and under instructions proceeded to Chicago to see what could be done.
     The promoters of the Parliament of Religions had failed for
some cause to send any literature, or any invitation whatever,to the
authorities of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, to
participate in that great world's gathering; and accordingly after
it had been determined to get representation for the Church in the

Parliament, the following letter was addressed to Mr. Charles
C. Bonney:

Dear Sir:
      Our attention has recently been called to the importance of the
World's Congress of all religions to be held at the World's Fair in Chicago
during the month of September.       We are given to understand that an
invitation is extended to all denominations of Christians and to all religions of the earth to meet "in friendly conference,      *   *   *   not for
debate, but to speak of     what are    them the supreme truths, and to
                                          to
show the relation of these truths to the practical problems of modern life.
In a word to illustrate their own religion and show its value to believers
and to the world."
      Appreciating the value and importance of such a parliament as this
is set forth to be,   we are solicitous    that the Church of Jesus Christ of
Latter-day Saints should be represented; and present for the consideration of the eminent religionists who will in this Congress be assembled,

<!-- page:677 -->

THE CHURCH AT THE PARLIAMENT OF RELIGIONS.                             677

what we regard as the "supreme truths," and the "distinguishing characteristics" of our faith.
     It will be scarcely necessary for us to call your attention to the fact
that an abiding interest centers in what the world calls "Mormonism;"
that its purely American origin will make it of special interest in such a
religious parliament as that proposed; that its success in the face of the
stupendous opposition it has encountered gives     it   the right to be heard
in such an assembly by its own accredited representatives.        All this we
believe will be patent to you, and we therefore respectfully ask that the
privilege be accorded us of sending a delegation to represent the Church
of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints at the World's Religious Congress.
    If the opportunity herein asked is accorded us, would you be kind

enough to inform us of the privileges that would be extended to our representatives; what time would be allowed for speaking or presentation
of papers, etc.; and especially if a committee room in the building

where the Congress is to be held would be at their service where they
could meet their friends, and converse with those who might wish to
make inquiry concerning our faith,    etc.   Indeed,    we should appreciate
any information you could communicate to us in respect to this matter;
and you will pardon our lack of information on the subject since none of
the literature treating of the movement has been forwarded to us.
     Hoping to hear from you at your earliest convenience we are,
                          Most respectfully yours,
                                      WiLFORD Woodruff,
                                      George Q. Cannon,
                                      Joseph F. Smith,
                             Presidency of the Church of Jesus Christ
                                  of Later-day Saints.

     To this letter it was expected that an immediate reply would
be received, but after waiting ten days and hearing nothing of it,
the writer, under instructions from the First Presidency of the
Church, started for Chicago, on July 20th, 1893, where he arrived
on the morning of July 25th.
     Among other letters of introduction to prominent people in
Chicago, the writer held one from Hon. Moses Thatcher to a relative of his residing in Chicago, Solomon Thatcher, Esq., one of the
United States Commissioners of the World's Columbian Exposition.
Through his kindness, the writer received an introduction to and
obtained an interview with General Director Davis.                We made

<!-- page:678 -->

678                    IMPROVEMENT ERA.

application to him for space in which to erect a booth that would
be furnished with a library of "Mormon Church" publications, books,
tracts, engravings, etc.; an educational display, Sunday School
work, etc.; explaining also that it was our purpose to establish a
bureau of information concerning "Mormon" affairs. His treatment
of us was cordial, but there was no space then at his disposal in
the Liberal Arts Building or elsewhere for such an exhibit; and
he was kind enough to express his regrets that our application for
space had not been made earlier. Through the same gentleman,
Mr. Thatcher, the writer managed after considerable effort and
many provoking delays, to obtain an interview with Mr. Charles C.
Bonney, the prime mover in the Parliament of Religions.           The
writer was informed before meeting the gentleman that he could
be accorded an interview of only five minutes. I found Mr. Bonney
to be a small and very nervous man, and not at all one that would
be suspected of being either intellectually capable or as possessing
weight of character sufficient to stand at the head of such an undertaking as the World's Congresses proved to be.
      On meeting him he at once made reference to the letter he had
received from the First Presidency of the Church, asking for admission into the Parliament, and which he had failed, up to that
time, to answer.   He had intended to answer it, so he said, but there
had been considerable difference of opinion in the general committee
of the   management of the Parliament,        to which the letter, it
seems, had been referred, as to       just   what reply ought to be
made.
      There was a very general opinion that the Church ought not
to be admitted to representation for the reason that it would doubtless prove to   be a disturbing element in the Parliament, and it
was doubtful in their minds if any good would come from its admission. The writer asked Mr. Bonney on what grounds the committee
had based the conclusion that the Mormon Church would be a disturbing element in the Parliament.     His answer was, because of
the great prejudice that existed against the     Mormons on account
of their plural marriage system.    The writer asked him if he did
not think that the "Mormon Church" should be admitted for the
very purpose of dispelling, if possible, that prejudice which now
arose to bar it from explaining its position to the world.  He ad-

<!-- page:679 -->

THE CHURCH AT THE PARLIAMENl OF RELIGIONS.                              679

mitted that he was persuaded so far as he was concerned that common fairness to our people demanded that they have representation
in the Parliament.   He then put the following question to the
writer:  "How would you answer the objection urged against the
representation of your Church in the Parliament, because of its
belief and practice of polygamy?"       The answer was that such an
objection to our admission to such a Parliament as was to assemble
ought not to be considered for a moment.          The oriental religions,
many of which at least tolerated the       practice of polygamy, were
not barred from representation in the parliament on that account;
and if they admitted unchristian and polygamous religions from the
East they ought not to bar those that were considered unchristian
and polygamous from the West.*
        In the second place, the Mormon Church had officially announced
the discontinuance of plural marriages and therefore            it   was not a
matter that should be considered when the question was discussed
as to whether it should be admitted to the Parliament, as reference
to our marriage system need form no part of the statement of our
faith further than to announce the discontinuance of the practice.
It was further urged upon Mr.     Bonney's attention that the Mormon
Church had been accused of prosecuting its work only among the
ignorant and that it would not dare to come in contact with the
enlightenment of our age and civilization; but now         it    proposed to
come where the rays of religious light and truth were supposed to
be focused, and place a statement of its creed side by side with
the creeds of all other religions; and for the Parliament to object
to its admission after the charges, as above explained, had been

    * As a matter of fact, the management of the parliament           had been
at great pains to induce representatives of oriental religions tolerating
polygamy, to be present and participate      in   the parliament, and they
actually admitted to the parliament a representative of the Mohammedan
faith   —Mohammed Alexander Russell Webb—who was permitted to
deliver two addressed in explanation and defense of his religion, including
polygamy; his speech being reported in the official record of the parliament, published by Rev. John H. Barrows, chairman of the general committee of religious congresses, p.p., 989-96, and 1040-52.

<!-- page:680 -->

680                      IMPROVEMENT ERA.

made against the "Mormons" would be inconsistent with the character of the great gathering and come with bad grace.
       Mr. Thatcher* ably seconded my explanations and reasons as
to why we should be heard, and I think together a favorable impression upon Mr. Bonney was made.            In any event, he promised
that the committee's attention should again be called to our application for admission.     I asked him if it would      be in keeping with the
character of the committee's meetings for me to be present when
the matter should come up for discussion.            This proposition he did
not favor, but asked me to state in writing the reason why the
Mormon Church should be admitted, and also furnish an outline
of what the address on paper would be.
      The interview lasted nearly thirty instead of five minutes.
      I prepared the papers he requested, but unfortunately the one

setting forth the reasons       why we should be admitted into the
parliament has been misplaced.             A copy of the outline of the
address I proposed making in the Parliament, and which was sent
to him with the reasons why we should be admitted, is as follows:

SUMMARY OP PAPER TO BE READ BY REPRESENTATIVE OF THE
   CHURCH OF JESUS CHRIST OF LATTER-DAY SAINTS (cOMMONLY
      KNOWN AS THE MORMON CHURCH) BEFORE THE PARLIA-
         MENT OF RELIGIONS HELD IN CONNECTION WITH
                   THE world's congress AUXILIARY:

                                      I.

      A brief statement of origin and subsequent history of the Mormon
Church   —
         its organization in New York, its migration westward to Ohio

and Missouri; its expulsion from Missouri; its settlement in and final
banishment from Illinois; its exodus from the United States to Salt Lake
Valley, in 1847   —then Mexican territory—    its   struggle for existence in
the midst of sterile elements— victory.
                                its

      * I shall always feel under deep obligation to Mr. Solomon Thatcher

for the very great interest he manifested in our cause, and the generous
help he afforded me in the discharge of the duties of my mission to this
Parliament. Several months after the close of the "World's Fair," the
worthy gentleman died.

<!-- page:681 -->

THE CHURCH AT THE PARLIAMENT OF RELIGIONS.                                             681

                                          II.

    Summary of its Articles of Faith           —   its   belief in God, the Father, in
Jesus Christ, in the Holy Ghost.         Its              atonement of Jesus
                                                belief in the
Christ, and in the Gospel as the       power of God unto salvation, unto all
who believe and obey it.       Its belief in the Bible as containing the word
of God, and in the Book of Mormon as a true history of Ancient America,
and also as containing the fullness of the Gospel of Jesus Christ. Its
belief in present and continuous revelation, upon which the Church is
founded, by which it was brought into existence, and by which it is guided.
Its belief in the literal restoration of Israel; the founding of the City of
Zion upon this continent, and the coming and reign of Messiah on earth.
Its belief in universal religious liberty,         and freedom of conscience.             Its
belief in being obedient to the law of the land            — honoring and sustain-
                                                               in
ing it, and in being subject to presidents, kings, rulers and magistrates.
Its belief in being honest, true, chaste, benevolent, virtuous,                 and in doing
good to all men   — there
                     if        is   anything virtuous, lovely or of good report,
or praiseworthy, Mormonism seeks after these things.

                                          III.

                                               —
     The organization of the Church. Its recognition of two orders of
priesthood   —
             Melchizedek and Aaronic, The officers of the first— the First
Presidency, the Twelve Apostles, the Seventies, High Priests and Elders.
                                —
The officers of the second the Bishopric, general and local; Priests,
Teachers and Deacons.        Its organization as to territory              —into stakes of
Zion, wards and branches.           Its numerical strength as represented by its

officers and lay members.

                                          IV.

     The home work of the Church as represented                     in   its   provisions for
the care of the poor, and providing instruction for the young.                           The
National Woman's Relief Society; the Mutual Improvement Associations
for young men and women; Sunday Schools and Primary Associations.

                                           V.

     The Foreign Work of the Church      —the labors of Missionaries, and
                                                                     its

the work accomplished     —the foreign countries, which they have preached
                                                          in

the Gospel   —the                has encountered
                    difficulties it                    work —
                                                           in thismartyrs.      its

                                          VI.

     The Mormon view of the application of the Gospel of Jesus Christ to

<!-- page:682 -->

682                 ,
                           IMPROVEMENT ERA.

the human race   —the reasons for Mormon temple building—the salvation
of the dead   —the vindication of both the justice and mercy of God the
                                                                     in

redemption of mankind through the Gospel of Jesus Christ.

                                    VII.

      Conclusion   —Mormon solution of the problems that confront the         religious world; recognizing unrighteousness, individual    and national, as
the cause of all evils existing in the world; and recognizing faith as the
incentive to all action, and faith in God, as the foundation of all righteousness   —Mormonism makes war upon unrighteousness, and consequently
upon all the evils of the world, by teaching faith in God, and in the Gospel of Jesus Christ, as to the embodiment of all God's laws to man.   And
by increasing the testimony of God's existence through modern revelation, and especially through the entire volume of scripture, which it pre-

sents to the world in the record of the ancient people of America   — so it

increases the evidence of God's existence, of the Messiahship of Jesus
Christ, and of the truth of the Gospel that the foundation for faith is
broadened, and the eternal foundation of righteousness    made more sure.

      After sending these papers to the reverend gentleman, I waited
some ten days for a reply, but received none; and considering that
the opportunity for a hearing in the Parliament for the Church was
very remote, I addressed a letter to Mr. Bonney, informing him of
my intentions to return to Salt Lake City, and that lie could forward to me by letter a statement of the action of the committee
with reference to our application for a hearing;         I also expressed

to him the hope that our application would be favorably acted upon.
     Some two or three weeks after returning to Salt Lake City,
and after all hope had been abandoned that we would hear favorably from the committee, I received the following communication
from Mr. Bonney:

                                   Chicago, U. S. A., August 28, 1893.
Elder B. H. Roberts,
      334 Constitution Building,
         Salt Lake City, Utah.
      My Dear Sir: My delay in writing you has arisen from linavoidable causes, and I now write in much haste to say that the Rev. Dr. John
Henry Barrows, chairman of the general committee on religious con-

<!-- page:683 -->

THE CHURCH AT THE PARLIAMENT OF RELIGIONS.                          683

gresses of 1893, is willing to receive from your Church the statement
                                                                        of
its faith and achievements, as proposed in your first communication;   and
will make such use of it as,   under the circumstances,   may seem wisest
and best.   In view of the full explanation
                                          made to you when you called
in company with Mr. Thatcher, I need not say more on this point. Your
communication to which I have referred is in Dr. Barrows' hands, and I
cannot therefore refer to it when writing this letter. The Parliament of
Religions will open on September 10th, and I trust this notice will be
ample time for the preparation of the paper you desire to present.
     Please explain to President Woodruff, and his associates, the reasons
for the delay in replying to their communication of July 10th, and ask
them to receive this information with the explanation you will make, as
a sufficient answer thereto.
                                    Very respectfully yours,
                                             Charles C. Bonney,
                                    President World's Congress Auxiliary.

     By the time this letter arrived the First Presidency had gone
East with the Tabernacle Choir to attend the World's Fair, and I
referred Mr. Bonney's letter to President Lorenzo Snow, who was
then in charge of the affairs of the Church during the absence of
the First Presidency.     He advised me to prepare an address which
it was proposed I    should write, but instead of mailing it to Mr.
Bonney he suggested that I go with it personally, "for," said he,
"if you merely send your paper they will pigeon-hole that, but if
you go down for the purpose of reading it they will not pigeon-hole
you so easily." Accordingly the paper was prepared, though on
account of having learned that only about twenty to thirty minutes
would be accorded for the reading of each paper, the scope of our
presentation as sent to Mr. Bonney had to be somewhat cut down,
and the paper was prepared on somewhat different lines to those
furnished Mr. Bonney.
     On the 8th of September I arrived in Chicago, (the Parliament
was appointed to assemble on the 11th,) and I presented myself at
the office of the Rev. John Henry Barrows, chairman of the Parliament. He seemed both somewhat surprised and annoyed at seeing
me, and reminded me of the very guarded promise made by President Bonney of the acceptance of my paper. This introduced a
somewhat earnest conversation between us in which pretty much

<!-- page:684 -->

684                   IMPROVEMENT ERA.

the same ground was gone over as to        why the Mormon Church
should be admitted to representation in the Parliament as at the
first conversation with Mr. Bonney, and feeling somewhat impatient

at the treatment accorded the Church I represented, I took occasion
to remind the reverend gentleman that there was a public opinion
that beyond all question would pass upon the unfairness of a rejection of the application of the Mormon    Church for hearing in that
Parliament, and that if we were not granted the right of a hearing,
the world at least should   know   of the narrow, sectarian bigotry
which had denied to us that right. This ended our interview, but
he accepted my paper for inspection, promising to give me an
answer the next day as to whether we would be permitted to read it
in the Parliament or not.
     On calling at Mr. Barrows' office the next day, I found that he
was not in, but Mr. Mervin Marie Snell, his secretary, was present and
invited me to wait until the Doctor should arrive.      Mr. Snell was
a professor in the science of Comparative Religions, and for a time
editor of the Oriental Magazine published in Washington, D. C, a
periodical devoted to the treatment of Comparative Religions.      In
the course of his religious studies he had made some acquaintance
with Mormonism and manifested a deep interest in securing for it
representation in the Parliament.      We engaged in conversation
pending the arrival of Dr. Barrows, and as Mr. Snell had been present at some of the committee meetings, where the propriety of
admitting the Mormon Church to representation in the Parliament
had been discussed, he gave me some very interesting accounts of the
stormy discussions that had taken place with reference to this subject.   Among other things he said that it had developed that from
the earliest agitation of the propriety of holding the Parliament it
had been at least tacitly understood that the Mormon Church would
not be admitted.   In some of the meetings the matter had come up
in this form:   Some one urging the objection to the Parliament had
said: If you hold such a Parliament of Religions you would be under
the necessity of admitting the      representatives of the   Mormon
Church, and who would want to meet on the same platform with
the representative of such a faith?  The answer to this objection
was represented to me as being, that Mormonism was not a religion
and therefore the Parliament would not be under obligations to

<!-- page:685 -->

THE CHURCH AT THE PARLIAMENT OF RELIGIONS.                       685

admit its representatives.   While this was not any formal action
on the part of any authorized committee connected with the organization of the Parliament, it does at least represent the sentiment
upon which the committee afterwards seems to have acted, and
may account for the fact that the authorities of the Mormon Church
received no literature on the subject of this great religious gathering, and no invitation to participate in the same.     Mr. Snell represented that in some of the meetings of the committee he had
urged our right to be heard. At about this point in our conversation, Dr. Barrows came in with a number of representatives of the

oriental faiths, and hurriedly informed me that he himself had not
had time to read my paper, but others in whose judgment he had
great confidence had read it and informed him that it was altogether unobjectionable in its character, and the paper would be
read in the Parliament. He was also kind enough to extend to me
an invitation to be present at a reception tendered the foreign
delegates to the parliament, at the beautiful home of Mr. and Mrs.
A. C. Bartlett, on Prairie Avenue, Chicago, on the evening of the
11th of September. When I informed him that the First Presidency
of the Church were also in Chicago visiting the World's Fair, he
extended a like invitation to them, but it transpired that their engagements would not permit of their acceptance.         I   went to the
reception in company with Mr. Thatcher and his wife, and had the
pleasure of meeting the distinguished gentlemen      who represented
nearly all the faiths of the world, an event that was especially interesting to me, as in a sense it seemed to bring one in contact with
all shades of religious opinions in the world.
