---
title: Improvement Era
description: Monthly periodical of the Mormon church, 1897 onward. This library holds the issues of November 1897 to December 1930.
authors:
  - Cluff, Benjamin, Jr.
collections:
  - periodicals
tags:
  - magazine
  - improvement-era
periodical: Improvement Era
volume: 1
number: 6
published: 1898-04
publisher: Young Men’s Mutual Improvement Associations
publisher_place: Salt Lake City
language: en
type: magazine
reference: 'Benjamin Jr. Cluff, "The Hawaiian Islands and Annexation," *Improvement Era* 1, no. 6 (April 1898): 435–447.'
source:
  url: https://archive.org/details/improvementera16unse
  transcription: Transcribed from the Internet Archive scan of each issue (the item for each issue is named in the issue's own source); unnumbered advertising leaves are omitted, printed page numbers are kept as page markers.
  identifier: improvementera16unse
start_page: 435
end_page: 447
rights:
  status: public-domain
  basis: US publication 1930 or earlier (published 1898-04)
  source: https://archive.org/details/improvementera16unse
  publication_year: 1898
  note: The Internet Archive item metadata carries a blanket "© Copyright by Intellectual Reserve, Inc." notice. The library owner judged it inapplicable because this issue was published in 1898, before 1931; a scan-level notice does not restore copyright.
---

# The Hawaiian Islands and Annexation

<!-- page:435 -->

THE HAWAIIAN ISLANDS AND ANNEXA-
                             TION.
BY    PROF.   BENJAMIN CLUFF, JR., PRESIDENT OF THE      BRIGHAM
                   YOUNG ACADEMY, PROVO, UTAH.

        In response to a request from Senator Frank J. Cannon,
I      San Francisco January 26, 1898, for the Sandwich
     left

Islands.   Mr. Cannon desired to be informed in relation to
the attitude of the Hawaiian people toward the subject of an-
nexation to the United States.    My mission therefore was
among the Kanakas.
     Going to these Islands was, to me, like going home; for
I had spent five years of my boyhood and three and one-half
years of my maturer life among the natives; had learned their
language, learned to eat their food, and had, in fact, come
to look upon them as friends and neighbors.       I  felt, as I

imagine one would feel who, having been brought up among
rural surroundings, returns to the old homestead after an ab-
sence of eighteen or twenty years of    life in   the city.   Laie
seems more like home to me than any place in Utah.
     I reached Honolulu on the night of February 1st, and

the next day began my investigations, which continued until
March 6th, when I boarded the steamship China for San
Francisco.
     Perhaps three-fourths of the Hawaiian people, or nearly
that  number, are primarily opposed to annexation.         The
other one-fourth, which in my judgment represents about
one-half of what would be called the intelligent, thinking peo-
ple are primarily in favor of annexation to the United States.
Upon inquiry, I discovered that the main reason for opposi-

<!-- page:436 -->

.

436                  IMPR O VEMENT ERA

tion to annexation is a desire for the restoration of the mon-
archy; in other words, the natives desire that change
which will bring back their queen. Almost all of the women
are Royalists, a fact which might easily have been guessed.
Briefly stated, the Royalists' arguments areas follows:
      From time immemorial the natives have possessed the
land and their chiefs have ruled over the people.      Since the
time of Kamehameha I. the Islands have been united under
one ruler, until the so-called revolution of 1893 replaced the
monarchy by a provisional government, which in turn was re-
placed by a republic.      This revolution was not a revolution
in fact.    The people  in  power now could not have possessed
themselves of the   government,    had they not been assisted by
the American marines from the warship Boston then in the
Honolulu harbor. The queen's forces were in possession of
the government buildings, had guns and ammunition, and
could easily have subdued the rebellion; but just at the criti-
cal time, the American soldiers were landed, brought close to
the royal palace, and equipped in every way for active ser-
vice.    It was reported about town that these soldiers would

support the revolutionary party at all hazards; and the
queen's forces, knowing the utter uselessness of fighting
against the United States, surrendered and decided to appeal
to Washington for redress.      That appeal is still being made,
and should the authorities at Washington refuse to reinstate
the queen, the appeal will be made to England; and should
England refuse, to Germany, or to Russia, or both; and so on
until all the nations of the earth have been appealed to, or
the queen has been restored.
      Among the less informed people, and among some who
might be classed as intelligent men, the belief is quite com-
mon that in case of annexation the natives would be driven
to the mountains, and be treated like the Indians of the west,
or rather as they have heard the Indians are treated; that
their lands would be taken from them and their property con-
fiscated; that they would be ostracized from society; and that
there would be a great rush of tramps and beggars such as
infest large cities like San Francisco.   Some even think they
would be enslaved like the negroes of the South.

<!-- page:437 -->

HA WAIIANS AND ANNEXA T10N.                           437

    On the other hand, the annexationists assert that the
Islands were never wholly under the rule of a Kanaka king;
that Kamehameha I., never could have conquored the other
chiefs but for the assistance he received from the white men,
John Young and Isaac Davis, who with their brass cannon
belching fire terrified and put to flight the king's enemies, and
that from the time of    Kamehameha I. down to the reign of
the present queen, the whites have always played an import-
ant part in the affairs of the government.     They assert, further,
that there   had been, during       several   successive   reigns,   so
marked a degeneracy in the ability, intelligence, and moral-
ity of the kings that in the time of Kalakaua there would have
been an overthrow of the kingdom had not that monarch
signed a constitution which virtually made him a figurehead
in the government and placed the reins of power in the hands
of responsible men.
     As early as 1855 the merchants and missionaries had al-
most despaired of any orderly or Christian-like conduct among
the rulers.   Despite good counsel and good instructions,
each one became a worse spendthrift and a greater debauchee
than his predecessor. The fourth Kamehameha was known
by all as a sot and a murderer. Kalakaua illegally sold lands
and franchises, using the money therefrom in gambling and
drinking; illegally caused an opium license law to be passed,
then sold a monopoly of the drug to a Chinese merchant for
                                                     leaving the
^75,000, and again to a syndicate for $80,000,
first buyer, who   had already paid his  money, destitute.   This
                   popular uprising in  1887, which nearly  over-
scandal   led to a
turned his throne.     It was at this juncture that the     king was

forced to sign the new constitution.
     At the death of Kalakaua, his sister, Lililuokalani
                                                          became
                                        "the policy of the queen
queen.    A contemporary    states that
                                           between  the tolerance
left her civilized subjects no alternative

of crime and her overthrow.   From the outset she paid little
                                              element in the
heed to her reform ministers, of the better
                                society about her.  Instead,
privy council, or of the white
                               the sentiments  of a Tahitian
she was guided in the main by
                       known   to   controversial    debates    about
blacksmith,    since
 Lililuokalani's private life, as Paramour
                                           Wilson; and who as

<!-- page:438 -->

.

438                  IMPR O VEMENT ERA

marshal of the kingdom, had a high official place at court."
Subsequent events proved that the queen was determined to
make herself queen in power as well as in name, and her first
step was to secure the election of an obsequious legislature,
one that would do her bidding. This done, she had a lottery
bill passed, by which at least a million dollars could be made;

for about this time the Louisiana lottery had been driven
from New Orleans and was ready to seek another place, and
no place in the world was better suited for their work than
Honolulu.     It was definitely known from the first that the

queen inclined to return to heathenism, and had around her,
like the chiefs of ancient Hawaii, Kahunas, who would per-
form idolatrous worship.        But that which immediately
brought on the revolt of the white people was a determina-
tion on the part of the queen to promulgate a new constitu-
tion which disfranchised all white people except those who
were married to native women; and one, therefore, which
would give the queen almost absolute power, especially over
the taxes and revenues of the country, and so place the
property owners at the mercy of her unqueenly avarice.
      When the new constitution was brought for the signa-
tures of her cabinet officers they refused to a man to attach
their names.     They had been on the streets, and had learned
from unmistakable sources the consequences that would fol-
low the promulgation of such a law. They advised the queen
to desist, but she replied:    "Gentlemen, I do not wish to
hear any more advice, I intend to promulgate this constitu-
tion and to do it now."    The advice of her officers prevailed,
however, for the time being, and she reluctantly consented to
postpone her contemplated action.
      In the meantime, the whites, having now lost all hope of
peace and order under native rule, determined to take the
government into their own hands. A committee of safety
was appointed which called a mass meeting to consider steps
for the abrogation of the monarchy.     The call set forth the
claim that the queen's action was revolutionary, for she had
solemnly pledged herself, on taking the throne, to support
the constitution; that this oath had been broken when she
endeavored to promulgate another constitution. The action

<!-- page:439 -->

HA WAIIANS AND ANNEXA TION.                         439

of the whites was,          therefore,    a counter-revolution.       At the
mass meeting, which was held the next day, the action of the
whites was open and above board, and known to the govern-
ment officials. If they felt confident of putting down the re-
bellion they surely would have made arrests at the time of
the conspiracy.   Marshal Wilson, it is said, did indeed pro-
pose to arrest them, but he was easily dissuaded. At this
time nothing had been said about landing marines, or appeal-
ing to the United States minister for assistance. It is well
known that America holds by far the greatest interests in
            —
Hawaii interests exceeding those of all other nations com-
bined, including the Hawaiian nation itself, and the bulk, or
about ninety per cent, of the whole trade is with the United
States.
       was but natural, therefore, as matters took on a more
      It

serious  aspect, that the American residents of Honolulu
should appeal to Minister Stevens for protection of life and
property, and should request that United States marines be
brought on shore as a precaution against violence. Minister
Stevens was very careful, however, to do nothing or say
nothing that would lead any one on either side to expect aid
in the revolution that seemed brewing.    He did, however,
that which was his duty to do; he assured the residents that
their property and their lives should be protected.
      The following order was issued by G. C.               Wiltse, under
instructions from Mr. Stevens:

"U. S. S. Boston (second rate.) Honolulu, (Hawaiian Islands), January
     16, 1893    —
               Lieutenant Commander W. T. Swinburne, United States
     Navy, Executive Office, U. S. S. Boston.
     Sir:  You will take command of the battalion and land in Honolulu for
the purpose of protecting our legation, consulate, and the lives and prop-
erty of American citizens and to assist in preserving public order.
     Great prudence must be exercised by both officers and men, and no ac-
tion taken that is not fully warranted by the condition of affairs and by the
conduct of those who may be inimical to the treaty rights of American
citizens.
    You will inform me at the earliest practicable moment of any change in
the situation.       Very respectfully,
       G. C. Wiltse, Captain U. S. Navy, commanding U. S. S. Boston."

      On the 17th of January the revolutionary party assem-

<!-- page:440 -->

.

440                  IMPR O VEMENT ERA

bled near the government building, having under their con-
trol nearly one thousand well armed men,        and there promul-
gated the decree abrogating the monarchy and establishing a
provisional government.      Not a gun was fired. The queen
and her troops had possession of the palace and grounds;
they were well armed, and if they had not been afraid, would
surely have done something at that time.           It is true the

United States marines were on shore, but not one of them
pointed a gun, or threatened to point a gun; and it was pretty
well known, at least to the revolutionary party, that no assist-
ance could be expected from them.
     The whites further assert that the claim made by the
Royalists that the Americans intimidated them, and thus in-
directly, if not directly, aided in the revolution, and that had
it not been for the marines they could easily have put down

                                      —
the rebellion, was an after-thought resort< d to when they
saw the political weight such a stand would have with the
United States and its people.
     This in brief is a statement of the two s'des, as I gathered
the facts from the natives and whites.      It is proper to state
that President Cleveland in the beginning of his administra-
tion sent a commissioner, a Mr. Blunt of Georgia, to investi-
gate the affair, and that on the strength of his report, he or-
dered Mr Willi?, who had bern appointed minister, in place
of Mr. Stevens, to restore the   queen, on certain conditions,
amo g. which was the pardon of all who had taken          part in
her overthrow.
    In answer to Mr. Willis's questions as to whether or not
she would pardon the revolutionists, she replied, so it is stated:
"No! There arelaws in my kingdom to deal with thesemen and
they should be dealt with and executed according to law," or
words to that effect. This astonishing answer was too much
for Mr. Willis, and a revenue cutter, in waiting, was sent im-
mediately to San Francisco, where dispatches were forwarded
to the President, informing him of the queen's stand.    In the
meantime congress had asked for all information concerning
the Islands, and the matter was referred to the senate.   It is
proper to say also that the little republic was not to give up
its life without a struggle.    Neither was it to be cowed or

<!-- page:441 -->

HAWAIIANS AND ANNEXATION.                        441

frightened by the presence of Uncle Sam's warships.      It had
guns and ammunition, a number of men, many of whom had
fought to put down the rebellion in the United States, and
were still connected with the Grand Army of the Republic.
They were willing now to defend the little Island republic.
Mr. Cleveland, therefore, found restoration to be no easy thing.
     I must confess that, feeling as I do towards the natives,

having lived with them so long, having partaken of their hos-
pitality, having labored with them, I was inclined m) self to
think that it would be far better if some compromise could be
effected by which the queen might be restored under certain
limitations acceptable to the interests of all parties. Such a
compromise, thought I, would surely be acceptable to the
whites; for my readers must understated that they own nearly
seventy-five per cent of all the wealth and pay nearly seventy-
five per cent of all of the   taxes,   and, therefore, their inter-
ests are proportionately large.        Further, quite a large per-
centage of the whites are native born, and Hawaii is as much
their home as America is ours.
    But I was not long on the Islands and had not talked
widely with the people, especially the Royalists, when I saw
the impossibility of restoration.      In reality the government
has been run for a great number of years on just such a com-
promise as I had in view.
    Abrogation of the monarchy had been advised by some
even in the time of Lunalilo and thereafter at different periods.
But the missionary element was very loth to consent to any
change so long as the rulers were not wholly antagonistic to
the material interests of the kingdom.       Hence in the time of
Kalakaua a compromise was effected by which he was per-
mitted to keep the throne, but was given little power to do
injury to the interests of the Islands.    But when it was im-
possible to  endure any  longer the  policies and mistakes of the
rulers, the rulers were  removed  and   the republic established.

I do not say that the natives have been properly treated in this
overthrow.   Perhaps the government has done as well as it
could and is now doing as well toward them as it can, but I
do not think that in their present mood they will permit it to
do much.

<!-- page:442 -->

Chiefly responsible for this condition of affairs is the Roy-
alistpress which incessantly poisons the minds of the people
towards the government and towards every policy that the
government pursues, including annexation.               This press does
not argue, does not discuss,       it   only asserts.     It    appeals to
race prejudices; it works upon the imagination and               upon the
fears of the people; and in that way it is their greatest enemy,
for they would do more for themselves if they understood the
situation.
     The petition they sent to congress is a specimen of their
blunderings.    Over 21,000 names are on the petition. In some
cases, I was reliably informed, one person would sign as many
as one hundred, and even one hundred and fifty names, and then
another person would sign the names of all whom he could
think of, and thus many duplicates appear.      The names of
children two years of age are signed in a bold, masculine
hand, and I was told that children not yet born, but ex-
pected soon, had their intended names signed.  This, how-
ever,may not be true. Investigations regarding this petition
have been carried on in congress, and I find that the state-
ment made to me regarding it are borne out by facts.                   Each
page     of the petition is certified to before a notary public          by
the presidents of the patriotic societies.         Thus        their   cause
has been greatly weakened, as it is continually weakened, by
exaggerated statements and false representations.
    My labors began at Laie, where I engaged two natives,
one favorable to annexation, the other to restoration, to ac-
company me around the Island.    At our meeting Feb. 6, which
was attended by two hundred or three hundred people, I first
explained my mission, then invited the natives to speak and
asked them to express their views and wishes freely.    Moses
Nakuaau was the first speaker. He favored immediate an-
nexation, giving as his reasons that "this government needs
the protection of a stronger power.  The queen cannot be re-
stored because she has proven her unfitness to rule.    Peace
cannot come, therefore, nor prosperity, except through annex-
ation. " He was followed by Keanu Nainoa, George Kekauoha,
and others, leaders       in   the Royalists societies.          They    ex-
pressed the feelings of the great majority in attendance, on

<!-- page:443 -->

HAWAIIAN'S AND ANNEXATION.                          443

opposing annexation, on the grounds that they desired the
queen restored to her throne.     "The United States," they
said, "has been instrumental in the overthrow and it
                                                     should
be instrumental in the restoration of the queen."
     In answer to the question, "What will you do in case
the United States does not restore the queen?" they replied,
"We will petition England for restoration."
        "Suppose England will not aid you?"
        "We will then petition other powers."
     "Suppose after you have petitioned all other powers,
you are still refused, would you prefer the present govern-
ment or would you prefer annexation to the United States?"
To this, the speakers could not answer  until they had con-
sulted their leaders in Honolulu. But a young man, Kekuku
by name, spoke for himself and not for the society of which
he was a member. Said he, "I want primarily the restora-
tion of the queen;    but   if   this   should be impossible,   if   the
queen cannot be restored, then I think it would be better for
the Hawaiian people to have the Islands annexed to the
United States."
     His sentiments, I believe, were shared by a majority of
those present.   It was quite proper for Nainoa and Kekauoha

and the leaders not to answer the question because their
answers might be interpreted as an official expression from the
societies. It was proper, however, for Kekuku and other lay
members to express their opinions, which they did. One man
whose name I have forgotten, and who, evidently, was a con-
stant reader of the Royalist press, made the startling an-
nouncement that in his opinion, should the Islands be an-
nexed the natives would have to flee to the United States, as
there would be no protection for them on the Islands.     He
was surprised when informed that by annexation, the Islands
would become a part of the United States and thus afford the
same protection as would be found in Washington or any of
the states of the union.
    After returning to Honolulu and laboring there for some
time, I sailed to Maui in company with Moses Nakuaau, and

from there, after a few days, to Hilo, Hawaii.
    On Maui we visited Lahaina, Wailuku, and Paia.                   At

<!-- page:444 -->

one of our meetings attended by about         thirty   Hawaiians, it
was the unanimous expression       of the house,   first, that they
desired restoration   of    the monarchy;    second, if monarchy
could not be restored, they desired annexation to the United
States.   In Wailuku,   I   met an intelligent man who preferred
the present form of government to annexation.               From this
island we sent nearly one hundred names attached to a peti-
tion to Mr.   Cannon favoring annexation.       We probably ob-
tained the names of two-thirds of the annexationists living at
the places in which we labored.      The others could not be ob-
tained, principally because the people     were absent. Some
favoring annexation would not sign, stating they had already
sent their names to Honolulu.
      From the town of Hilo,      Hawaii,    my native friend ob-
tained fifty names of intelligent persons desiring annexation.
I had instructed him to go only among those who would be
classed as intelligent people, as the  names of others, for or
against, would have little or no bearing.  He reported twenty
others whom he either did not see or who were unwilling to
sign, principally for family reasons.       The women       are   much
stronger Royalists than the men, in     all parts of the      Islands;
and while some men secretly favor annexation, realizing that
it would be best for their people, they dare not openly make

the assertion for fear of a family row.        Two or three who
were seen at home in the evening requested Mr Nakuaau to
call at their places of work the next day and they would sign,
as their wives were opposed to annexation.
     The leading Royalists whom I visited in Hilo were John
Brown, Henry West, and John T. Baker, all well educated
half-whites.    Do not attach any particular significance to the
fact that these are half-whites, for among the Hawaiian peo-
ple, the child is what the mother is.   If the mother is a great

chief and the father not, the child is a great chief; but the
child whose mother is of the lower caste, and whose father
may be of the higher, is considered of the lower caste. A
half-white, where the mother is a Hawaiian, is as much a
Hawaiian as the mother, in the estimation of the people.
      I consider Mr. John T. Baker the most intelligent Royal-

ist I met outside of Honolulu.    His language is almost clas-

<!-- page:445 -->

HAWAIIANS AND ANNEXATION.                      445

sic,    and   I   spent a very pleasant evening with him and his
family.       He favors the restoration of monarchy.        Kalakaua
was a friend to him, helped him in his times of poverty, and
leased him a large tract of land at a low rental, from which
he now derives a considerable income. He could not, there-
fore, he says, take any stand antagonistic to Kalakaua's sister,
or, using his own words, "Should I oppose the queen, the
spirit of Kalakaua might look down upon me disapprovingly."
He said further, if some one had come among the natives
just after the overthrow of the       monarchy and had explained
matters to them as was          now being done, the attitude of the
people would be different.         "But," said he, "the government
startled us, then wholly disregarded us,             pushing us away,
and now it is hard for them to do anything with us. When
you beat a wild mule over the head (I use his own figure)
it is hard to tame him afterwards." His wife was governess
of Hawaii under Kalakaua, and he governor under Lililuo-
kalani.
     Mr. Brown and Henry West were together when I met
them, laboring for the government at $3 00 per day building
a pier in Hilo harbor.  They both favor restoration, and to
my question as to whether or not they would prefer annex-
ation to the present government, should restoration be im-
possible, they would give no answer.        Realizing that it
would be impossible to maintain peace throughout the Is-
lands without some protection even after restoration, they ex-
pressed themselves to the effect that they would favor annex-
ation after the monarchy had been restored.      "Let the re-
quest come from the native people to the United States,"
said they,        "and all will favor annexation."    They think that
    the duty of the United States, since through its influence
it is

the queen was overthrown, to restore her again.
    Summing up, therefore, to the best of my judgment I
should say that at least one half of what might be called the
intelligent, thinking natives favor annexation uncondition-
ally; and that the other half together with the great bulk of
the people that usually- follow leaders, favor the restoration
of monarchy.   But, should it be known that monarchy can-
not be restored, the great majority, both of those            who   are

<!-- page:446 -->

now Royalist leaders and those who are their followers, will
    favor annexation in preference to the present form of govern-
ment.   I am further of the opinion that if the truth could be

explained to the people by someone in whom they would have
confidence, three-fourths of the intelligent people together
with others who would follow them would primarily want an-
nexation.
     Let me add that the Hawaiian people are not low and
degraded as some anti-annexationists would have us believe.
I met but one person on the Islands that could not read and

write.    They have had compulsory education there for
years, and almost every one is versed in reading, writing,
arithmetic, geography and history.    They are especially well
acquainted with the history of their own Islands, and with an
outline, at least, of the history of the United States, still,
like the peoples of other nations, the few lead and the
many follow. Neither are they naturally a lazy people.
They do not like work, but one usually dislikes that which
one is unaccustomed to. For generations they have lived in
comparative ease, the earth producing nearly all the neces-
sities of life.They are, therefore, unaccustomed to daily toil.
       Under new conditions, with proper instructions and
care on the part of their leaders they will soon, in my opinion,
become an industrious people.
     Much has been said about leprosy. Twenty years ago
itwas a common thing to see a leper; today it is uncommon.
During all my travels, and I was particularly watchful, I
never saw a case.   There are lepers on the Leper Island, but
they are banished, and cared for by the government.   I think,

therefore, that leprosy is doomed, and that by another gen-
eration it will be as rare as among us.
       The question has also been asked me,    if   I   thought the
present government could endure should annexation be re-
fused.  Unhesitatingly, I say yes, but not without trouble.
I    believe that there will be revolutions and bloodshed,      up-
risings and discontent, and property will be unsafe in a very
few years if the Islands are not annexed. Through it all the
government may have power to endure, but it will necessar-
ily have to pass through these trials before contending fac-

<!-- page:447 -->

HAWAIIANS AND ANNEXATION.                       446

tions will have confidence in it.   It   may never be very stable,
and the interests of the United States, and the commercial
importance of the Islands to the United States are such
that it is only a matter of time
                               when they will be annexed, if
they are not annexed during the present session of congress.
                                                —
    There is one more question, however that concerning
                             Did the United States illegally
the legality of the revolution.
interfere, or did they not?   To this, I will let others who un-
derstand the situation better than I, answer. But in my
opinion the overthrow of the monarchy sometime or other
was as inevitable as the dawn of a new century. Wherever
the Anglo-Saxon blood comes in contact with the blood of in-
ferior peoples, it rules; and in Hawaii was repeated in a mild
and peaceful way the evolutionary steps that took place in
America. The white man came and he conquored the Ind-
ians.   He purchased their lands from them, crowding them
farther into the wilderness.    Time and again they took deci-
sive stands to stem his onward march, and time and again
they were beaten farther back, for this march was destiny.
So in the Sandwich Islands, from the time John Young assist-
ed Kamehameha in conquering the Islands, the rule of the
Hawaiian people was doomed, and every decade since then
has brought its end nearer. The revolution that overthrew
the queen was more a step in the grand evolution of events
than it was a revolution, not perhaps the final step, but an
important one.     Had it not come in 1893 it might have come
in 1894, or later, but come it would.
